Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB vs ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB: Full Comparison!

Created date: 2018-09-30 22:43:05, Updated date: 2020-04-15 17:29:28

alcatel 3x (2018) 32GBZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB
alcatel 3x (2018) 32GBZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB

How are the "alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

alcatel 3x (2018) 32GBZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB
alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB

ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB

General rating:

54.2/100

(The 2302th of all smartphones)

62.4/100

(The 2105th of all smartphones)

Grip
64/100
55/100
Screen quality
63/100
84/100
Performance
56/100
67/100
Storage size
78/100
84/100
Battery
92/100
92/100
Rear-camera resolution
72/100
90/100
Front-camera resolution
65/100
80/100

What is the difference between the "alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB" and the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB"

The design of alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB

The "alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB" is 153.5mm long, 71.6mm wide, and 8.5mm thick. It weighs 144.0g.

The design of ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB

The "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" is 151.7mm long, 75.0mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 175.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 1.8mm in length, 3.4mm in width, and 0.5mm in thickness. "alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB". Both the "alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 31g. The "alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB

ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB

Ease of holding it in one hand70/10064/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand58/10036/100
Ease of carrying around63/10060/100

Compare the display of the "alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB"

Display of the alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB

The "alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1440, and the pixel density is 282ppi. The "alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB" has a 5.7inch screen size.

Display of the ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB

The "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" uses a AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1440 x 2560, and the pixel density is 534ppi. The "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.2inch difference in the display sizes. When actually viewing the two phones' onscreen displays, it is obvious that they are roughly the same size. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB" and the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size. Both the "alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB" and the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB". The "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB

ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?73/10072/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?75/10073/100

Compare the camera performances of the "alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB"

Camera performance of alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB

The main camera of the "alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Camera performance of ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB

The main camera of the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" has 20.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 7MP difference in comparison. The "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB" and the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB

ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?72/10090/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?65/10080/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB"

The processing capability of the alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB" uses the Mediatek MT6739 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.

The processing capability of the ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.15GHz+1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB", the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" has more memory storage, making the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB" and the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" are not large at all. For people who mostly use their phone to look up things on the internet, watch videos, or occasionally play mini games, the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" edges out the competition.

For playing 2D and simpler 3D games, "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" is more suitable as the games are less likely to stall. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" than the "alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB".

alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB

ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet73/10077/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games45/10060/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB"

Battery performance of alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB

The "alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.

Battery performance of ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB

The "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" has a battery capacity of 3250.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 250mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For looking things up online, checking SNS, playing games occasionally or for most frequent use, it doesn't feel like there is much difference between the "alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB" and the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB". Both the "alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB" and the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

If you're using it frequently, for example playing games for a long time or using it to watch movies, you may feel no difference between the two devices. Both the "alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB" and the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB

ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet92/10092/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos82/10081/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB"

The storage capacity of the alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB

The "alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB

The "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 1024.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 32GB. "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 928GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. Both the "alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB" and the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB

ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games78/10084/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos78/10096/100

Which to buy, the "alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB" or "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB" or "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB"?

"alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 5.5inch makes the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" a lot easier to use. The "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" also hands down has the superior specs. When comparing "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" and "alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB" overall, "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.

alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB

ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB

Handling64/10055/100
Display63/10084/100
CPU specs56/10067/100
General rating68/10076/100

Is it recommended to buy the alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "alcatel 3x (2018) 32GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

alcatel 3x (2018) 32GBZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB
alcatel 3x (2018) 32GBZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB
ColorMetallic Black/Metallic Blue/Metallic GoldSpectrum Black/Spectrum Blue/Spectrum GoldIon Gold/Quartz Grey/Chromium Silver
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)71.6mm x 153.5mm x 8.5mm75.0mm x 151.7mm x 7.9mm
Weight144.0g175.0g
Display size5.7inch5.5inch
Display typeIPS LCDAMOLED
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 14401440 x 2560
Pixel density282ppi534ppi
Battery capacity3000.0mAh3250.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6739Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820
CPU specs1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)2.15GHz+1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size3.0GB4.0GB
Storage size32.0GB64.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP20.0MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP8.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles