Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Which one is better, the ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB or BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!

Created date: 2018-11-18 10:38:15, Updated date: 2020-04-16 16:08:08

BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GBZTE Open C (2014) 4GB
BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GBZTE Open C (2014) 4GB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB".

BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GBZTE Open C (2014) 4GB
BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB

ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB

General rating:
Griprating-image2.9
75.2mm x 156.7mm x 8.4mm
rating-image3.6
64.7mm x 126.0mm x 10.8mm
Screen qualityrating-image3.2
IPS LCD, 6.0inch, 720 x 1440
rating-image1.7
TFT, 4.0inch, 480 x 800
Performancerating-image1.4
Mediatek MT6580, 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores), 1.0GB
rating-image1
Qualcomm MSM8210 Snapdragon 200, 1.2GHz×2(2.0-cores), 512.0MB
Storage sizerating-image3.5
16.0GB
rating-image1
4.0GB
Batteryrating-image4.1
2600.0mAh
rating-image2.8
1400.0mAh
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image3.6
13.0MP
rating-image3.9
15.0MP
Front-camera resolutionrating-image4.0
8.0MP
rating-image

What is the difference between the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB"

The design of BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB

The "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" is 156.7mm long, 75.2mm wide, and 8.4mm thick. It weighs 155.0g.

The design of ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB

The "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" is 126.0mm long, 64.7mm wide, and 10.8mm thick. It weighs 125.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 30.6mm in length, 10.5mm in width, and 2.4mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" is more compact than "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.

The difference in weight is 30g. The "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB

ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB

Ease of holding it in one hand63/10074/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand49/10074/100
Ease of carrying around59/10067/100

Compare the display of the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB"

Display of the BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB

The "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1440, and the pixel density is 268ppi. The "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" has a 6.0inch screen size.

Display of the ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB

The "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 800, and the pixel density is 233ppi. The "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" has a 4.0inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 2inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

In terms of display, the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" nor the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB

ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?76/10046/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?78/10025/100

Compare the camera performances of the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB"

Camera performance of BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB

The main camera of the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Camera performance of ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB

The main camera of the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" has 15.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 2MP difference in comparison. There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, for taking photos of objects in close proximity such as desserts or food that can be posted on Instagram, the camera of "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" has a better performance. Both the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB

ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?72/10077/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?80/100 -

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB"

The processing capability of the BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6580 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.

The processing capability of the ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8210 Snapdragon 200 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB", the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 511GB difference in memory capacity. The "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" has more memory storage, making the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" is the better choice to buy over the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB". The "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

There is basically no difference between "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. For playing more memory-intensive 3D games, it is better to go with "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" as it has better performance. Neither the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" nor the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB

ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet47/10027/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games12/1004/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB"

Battery performance of BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB

The "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2600.0mAh.

Battery performance of ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB

The "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" has a battery capacity of 1400.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1200mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" over the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB". The "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use.

BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB

ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet81/10055/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos64/10033/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB"

The storage capacity of the BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB

The "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB

The "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 12GB. The "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 44GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content.

BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB

ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games70/10017/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos67/10055/100

Which to buy, the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" or "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" or "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 6.0inch makes the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" a lot easier to use. The "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB", the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" is overall the clear winner.

BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB

ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB

Handling58/10072/100
Display64/10034/100
CPU specs28/10016/100
General rating58/10038/100

Is it recommended to buy the BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GBZTE Open C (2014) 4GB
BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GBZTE Open C (2014) 4GB
ColorBlack/Blue/SilverOrange/Black
OSAndroidFirefox
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)75.2mm x 156.7mm x 8.4mm64.7mm x 126.0mm x 10.8mm
Weight155.0g125.0g
Display size6.0inch4.0inch
Display typeIPS LCDTFT
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1440480 x 800
Pixel density268ppi233ppi
Battery capacity2600.0mAh1400.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6580Qualcomm MSM8210 Snapdragon 200
CPU specs1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.2GHz×2(2.0-cores)
RAM size1.0GB512.0MB
Storage size16.0GB4.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP15.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles