Which one is better, the ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB or BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!
Created date: 2018-11-18 10:38:15, Updated date: 2020-04-16 16:08:08
Which do we recommend after comparing the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB".
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" or "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" ?
What is the difference between the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB"
The design of BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB
The "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" is 156.7mm long, 75.2mm wide, and 8.4mm thick. It weighs 155.0g.
The design of ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB
The "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" is 126.0mm long, 64.7mm wide, and 10.8mm thick. It weighs 125.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 30.6mm in length, 10.5mm in width, and 2.4mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" is more compact than "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.
The difference in weight is 30g. The "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB | ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 63/100 | 74/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 49/100 | 74/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 59/100 | 67/100 |
Compare the display of the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB"
Display of the BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB
The "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1440, and the pixel density is 268ppi. The "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" has a 6.0inch screen size.
Display of the ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB
The "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 800, and the pixel density is 233ppi. The "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" has a 4.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 2inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
In terms of display, the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" nor the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB | ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 76/100 | 46/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 78/100 | 25/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB"
Camera performance of BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB
The main camera of the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Camera performance of ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB
The main camera of the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" has 15.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 2MP difference in comparison. There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, for taking photos of objects in close proximity such as desserts or food that can be posted on Instagram, the camera of "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" has a better performance. Both the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB | ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 77/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 80/100 | - |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB"
The processing capability of the BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6580 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.
The processing capability of the ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8210 Snapdragon 200 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB", the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 511GB difference in memory capacity. The "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" has more memory storage, making the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" is the better choice to buy over the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB". The "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
There is basically no difference between "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. For playing more memory-intensive 3D games, it is better to go with "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" as it has better performance. Neither the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" nor the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB | ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 47/100 | 27/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 12/100 | 4/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB"
Battery performance of BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB
The "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2600.0mAh.
Battery performance of ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB
The "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" has a battery capacity of 1400.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1200mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" over the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB". The "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use.
BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB | ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 81/100 | 55/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 64/100 | 33/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB"
The storage capacity of the BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB
The "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB
The "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 12GB. The "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 44GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content.
BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB | ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 70/100 | 17/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 67/100 | 55/100 |
Which to buy, the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" or "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" or "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 6.0inch makes the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" a lot easier to use. The "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB", the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" is overall the clear winner.
BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB | ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 58/100 | 72/100 |
Display | 64/100 | 34/100 |
CPU specs | 28/100 | 16/100 |
General rating | 58/100 | 38/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB" and "ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
BLU Studio Mega (2018) 16GB | ZTE Open C (2014) 4GB | |
Color | Black/Blue/Silver | Orange/Black |
OS | Android | Firefox |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 75.2mm x 156.7mm x 8.4mm | 64.7mm x 126.0mm x 10.8mm |
Weight | 155.0g | 125.0g |
Display size | 6.0inch | 4.0inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | TFT |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1440 | 480 x 800 |
Pixel density | 268ppi | 233ppi |
Battery capacity | 2600.0mAh | 1400.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6580 | Qualcomm MSM8210 Snapdragon 200 |
CPU specs | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.2GHz×2(2.0-cores) |
RAM size | 1.0GB | 512.0MB |
Storage size | 16.0GB | 4.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 15.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |