BLU C5 (2017) vs Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB: Full Comparison!
Created date: 2018-11-18 11:43:22, Updated date: 2020-04-16 18:23:41
Which do we recommend after comparing the "BLU C5 (2017)" and "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "BLU C5 (2017)" and "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB".
BLU C5 (2017) | Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB | |||
General rating: | 39.3/100 (The 5824th of all smartphones) | 57.8/100 (The 2205th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 55/100 | 58/100 | ||
Screen quality | 48/100 | 61/100 | ||
Performance | 17/100 | 62/100 | ||
Storage size | 35/100 | 70/100 | ||
Battery | 75/100 | 92/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 35/100 | 72/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 55/100 | 80/100 |
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "BLU C5 (2017)" and the "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "BLU C5 (2017)" and "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "BLU C5 (2017)" and "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "BLU C5 (2017)" and "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "BLU C5 (2017)" and "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "BLU C5 (2017)" and "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "BLU C5 (2017)" and "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "BLU C5 (2017)" or "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "BLU C5 (2017)" and "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "BLU C5 (2017)" and the "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "BLU C5 (2017)" and "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB"
The design of BLU C5 (2017)
The "BLU C5 (2017)" is 144.4mm long, 73.2mm wide, and 10.0mm thick. It weighs 172.0g.
The design of Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB
The "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" is 152.3mm long, 76.4mm wide, and 8.0mm thick. It weighs 147.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 7.9mm in length, 3.2mm in width, and 2mm in thickness. Both the "BLU C5 (2017)" and "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "BLU C5 (2017)" and "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB". Both the "BLU C5 (2017)" and "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 25g. The "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
BLU C5 (2017) | Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 64/100 | 61/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 38/100 | 55/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 60/100 | 58/100 |
Compare the display of the "BLU C5 (2017)" and "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB"
Display of the BLU C5 (2017)
The "BLU C5 (2017)" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 854, and the pixel density is 195ppi. The "BLU C5 (2017)" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Display of the Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB
The "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" is comparatively more suited for use with VR as it has a sleeker display. Neither the "BLU C5 (2017)" nor the "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
BLU C5 (2017) | Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 68/100 | 72/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 60/100 | 73/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "BLU C5 (2017)" and "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB"
Camera performance of BLU C5 (2017)
The main camera of the "BLU C5 (2017)" has 5.0MP. The front camera has 3.15MP.
Camera performance of Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB
The main camera of the "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 8MP difference in comparison. The "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
There is a 4.85MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
BLU C5 (2017) | Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 35/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 55/100 | 80/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "BLU C5 (2017)" and "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB"
The processing capability of the BLU C5 (2017)
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "BLU C5 (2017)" uses the Mediatek MT6570 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.
The processing capability of the Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB
The CPU performance is 1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "BLU C5 (2017)", the "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 510MB difference in memory capacity. The "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" has more memory storage, making the "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" is the better choice to buy over the "BLU C5 (2017)". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB". The "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "BLU C5 (2017)" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
The "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" than the "BLU C5 (2017)". The "BLU C5 (2017)" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
BLU C5 (2017) | Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 28/100 | 79/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 4/100 | 44/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "BLU C5 (2017)" and "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB"
Battery performance of BLU C5 (2017)
The "BLU C5 (2017)" has a battery capacity of 2000.0mAh.
Battery performance of Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB
The "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" has a battery capacity of 3500.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1500mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" over the "BLU C5 (2017)". Both the "BLU C5 (2017)" and the "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
BLU C5 (2017) | Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 75/100 | 92/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 53/100 | 82/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "BLU C5 (2017)" and "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB"
The storage capacity of the BLU C5 (2017)
The "BLU C5 (2017)" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB
The "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 8GB. The "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "BLU C5 (2017)" unfortunately falls behind here. The "BLU C5 (2017)" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 24GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. "BLU C5 (2017)" is recommended over "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" if you save a lot of movies to watch on your phone, or if you save a lot of photos.
BLU C5 (2017) | Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 35/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 66/100 | 59/100 |
Which to buy, the "BLU C5 (2017)" or "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "BLU C5 (2017)" or "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB"?
When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "BLU C5 (2017)" and "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB". Its perfect screen size of 5.5inch makes the "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" a lot easier to use. The "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" and the "BLU C5 (2017)", the "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" is overall the clear winner.
BLU C5 (2017) | Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 55/100 | 58/100 |
Display | 48/100 | 61/100 |
CPU specs | 17/100 | 62/100 |
General rating | 44/100 | 66/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the BLU C5 (2017), compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "BLU C5 (2017)" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. Judging from the overall specs, the "BLU C5 (2017)" is a mid-range smartphone.
Is it recommended to buy the Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
What are the spec differences between the "BLU C5 (2017)" and "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "BLU C5 (2017)" and "Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
BLU C5 (2017) | Panasonic Eluga Icon 16GB | |
Color | black,gold,silver,rose gold | Black |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 73.2mm x 144.4mm x 10.0mm | 76.4mm x 152.3mm x 8.0mm |
Weight | 172.0g | 147.0g |
Display size | 5.0inch | 5.5inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 480 x 854 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 195ppi | 267ppi |
Battery capacity | 2000.0mAh | 3500.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6570 | |
CPU specs | 1.3GHz×2(2.0-cores) | 1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 512.0MB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 8.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 3.15MP | 8.0MP |