Coolpad 3632 8GB and Plum Axe Plus 4GB review
Created date: 2018-11-18 11:28:47, Updated date: 2020-04-16 22:32:15
Which do we recommend after comparing the "Coolpad 3632 8GB" and "Plum Axe Plus 4GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Coolpad 3632 8GB" and "Plum Axe Plus 4GB".
Coolpad 3632 8GB | Plum Axe Plus 4GB | |||
General rating: | 26.3/100 (The 2994th of all smartphones) | 33.7/100 (The 2905th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | - /100 | 75/100 | ||
Screen quality | 57/100 | 34/100 | ||
Performance | 29/100 | 16/100 | ||
Storage size | 35/100 | 17/100 | ||
Battery | - /100 | 47/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 35/100 | 35/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 50/100 | 55/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Coolpad 3632 8GB" and the "Plum Axe Plus 4GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Coolpad 3632 8GB" and "Plum Axe Plus 4GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Coolpad 3632 8GB" and "Plum Axe Plus 4GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Coolpad 3632 8GB" and "Plum Axe Plus 4GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Coolpad 3632 8GB" and "Plum Axe Plus 4GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Coolpad 3632 8GB" and "Plum Axe Plus 4GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Coolpad 3632 8GB" and "Plum Axe Plus 4GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Coolpad 3632 8GB" or "Plum Axe Plus 4GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Coolpad 3632 8GB" and "Plum Axe Plus 4GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Coolpad 3632 8GB" and the "Plum Axe Plus 4GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Coolpad 3632 8GB" and "Plum Axe Plus 4GB"
The design of Coolpad 3632 8GB
The design of Plum Axe Plus 4GB
The "Plum Axe Plus 4GB" is 129.0mm long, 65.1mm wide, and 9.9mm thick. It weighs 112.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
Coolpad 3632 8GB | Plum Axe Plus 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | - | 75/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | - | 84/100 |
Ease of carrying around | - | 67/100 |
Compare the display of the "Coolpad 3632 8GB" and "Plum Axe Plus 4GB"
Display of the Coolpad 3632 8GB
The "Coolpad 3632 8GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 854, and the pixel density is 160ppi. The "Coolpad 3632 8GB" has a 6.1inch screen size.
Display of the Plum Axe Plus 4GB
The "Plum Axe Plus 4GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 800, and the pixel density is 233ppi. The "Plum Axe Plus 4GB" has a 4.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 2inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "Coolpad 3632 8GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "Coolpad 3632 8GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Coolpad 3632 8GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Coolpad 3632 8GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Plum Axe Plus 4GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
In terms of display, the "Plum Axe Plus 4GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. "Plum Axe Plus 4GB" is comparatively more suited for use with VR as it has a sleeker display. Neither the "Coolpad 3632 8GB" nor the "Plum Axe Plus 4GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Coolpad 3632 8GB | Plum Axe Plus 4GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 77/100 | 46/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 80/100 | 25/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Coolpad 3632 8GB" and "Plum Axe Plus 4GB"
Camera performance of Coolpad 3632 8GB
The main camera of the "Coolpad 3632 8GB" has 5.0MP. The front camera has 2.0MP.
Camera performance of Plum Axe Plus 4GB
The main camera of the "Plum Axe Plus 4GB" has 5.0MP. The front camera has 3.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "Coolpad 3632 8GB" and "Plum Axe Plus 4GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones.
There is a 1MP difference in front camera pixel number. When shooting objects or people with the front phone camera from a short distance, such as taking a selfie with a selfie-stick, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones, even when it comes to the scenery in the background of such photographs. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "Coolpad 3632 8GB" and "Plum Axe Plus 4GB" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.
Coolpad 3632 8GB | Plum Axe Plus 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 35/100 | 35/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 50/100 | 55/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Coolpad 3632 8GB" and "Plum Axe Plus 4GB"
The processing capability of the Coolpad 3632 8GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Coolpad 3632 8GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.
The processing capability of the Plum Axe Plus 4GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Plum Axe Plus 4GB" uses the Mediatek MT6572M SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Plum Axe Plus 4GB", the "Coolpad 3632 8GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 511GB difference in memory capacity. The "Coolpad 3632 8GB" has more memory storage, making the "Coolpad 3632 8GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Coolpad 3632 8GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Plum Axe Plus 4GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Coolpad 3632 8GB". The "Plum Axe Plus 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
For playing 2D and simpler 3D games, "Coolpad 3632 8GB" is more suitable as the games are less likely to stall. For playing more memory-intensive 3D games, it is better to go with "Coolpad 3632 8GB" as it has better performance. Neither the "Coolpad 3632 8GB" nor the "Plum Axe Plus 4GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Coolpad 3632 8GB | Plum Axe Plus 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 50/100 | 27/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 12/100 | 4/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Coolpad 3632 8GB" and "Plum Axe Plus 4GB"
Battery performance of Coolpad 3632 8GB
Battery performance of Plum Axe Plus 4GB
The "Plum Axe Plus 4GB" has a battery capacity of 1200.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
Coolpad 3632 8GB | Plum Axe Plus 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | - | 47/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | - | 25/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Coolpad 3632 8GB" and "Plum Axe Plus 4GB"
The storage capacity of the Coolpad 3632 8GB
The "Coolpad 3632 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Plum Axe Plus 4GB
The "Plum Axe Plus 4GB" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 4GB. The "Coolpad 3632 8GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Coolpad 3632 8GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Plum Axe Plus 4GB" unfortunately falls behind here. Neither the "Coolpad 3632 8GB" nor the "Plum Axe Plus 4GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 4GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "Coolpad 3632 8GB" or "Plum Axe Plus 4GB".
Coolpad 3632 8GB | Plum Axe Plus 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 35/100 | 17/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 56/100 | 55/100 |
Which to buy, the "Coolpad 3632 8GB" or "Plum Axe Plus 4GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Coolpad 3632 8GB" or "Plum Axe Plus 4GB"?
Its perfect screen size of 6.1inch makes the "Coolpad 3632 8GB" a lot easier to use. The "Coolpad 3632 8GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.
Coolpad 3632 8GB | Plum Axe Plus 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | - | 75/100 |
Display | 57/100 | 34/100 |
CPU specs | 29/100 | 16/100 |
General rating | 41/100 | 38/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Coolpad 3632 8GB, compared with other smartphones?
The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Coolpad 3632 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the Plum Axe Plus 4GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Plum Axe Plus 4GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "Plum Axe Plus 4GB" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Coolpad 3632 8GB" and "Plum Axe Plus 4GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Coolpad 3632 8GB" and "Plum Axe Plus 4GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Coolpad 3632 8GB | Plum Axe Plus 4GB | |
Color | Gold | Black/White/Blue/Red |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 65.1mm x 129.0mm x 9.9mm | |
Weight | 112.0g | |
Display size | 6.1inch | 4.0inch |
Display type | TFT | TFT |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 480 x 854 | 480 x 800 |
Pixel density | 160ppi | 233ppi |
Battery capacity | 1200.0mAh | |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 | Mediatek MT6572M |
CPU specs | 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.2GHz×2(2.0-cores) |
RAM size | 1.0GB | 512.0MB |
Storage size | 8.0GB | 4.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 5.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 2.0MP | 3.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |