Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Energizer Energy E500S 8GB vs. Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB Specs & Scores

Created date: 2018-11-18 12:36:53, Updated date: 2021-10-20 21:21:14

Energizer Energy E500S 8GBCelkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB
Energizer Energy E500S 8GBCelkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB".

Energizer Energy E500S 8GBCelkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB
Energizer Energy E500S 8GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

General rating:

37.3/100

(The 2775th of all smartphones)

45.9/100

(The 677th of all smartphones)

Grip
67/100
63/100
Screen quality
48/100
56/100
Performance
26/100
47/100
Storage size
35/100
70/100
Battery
77/100
76/100
Rear-camera resolution
50/100
50/100
Front-camera resolution
65/100
50/100

What is the difference between the "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB" and the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

The design of Energizer Energy E500S 8GB

The "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB" is 139.8mm long, 71.5mm wide, and 8.6mm thick. It weighs 127.0g.

The design of Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" is 145.6mm long, 71.8mm wide, and 8.0mm thick. It weighs 149.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 5.7mm in length, 0.2mm in width, and 0.5mm in thickness. Both the "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB". Both the "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 22g. The "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

Energizer Energy E500S 8GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Ease of holding it in one hand70/10070/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand72/10054/100
Ease of carrying around63/10063/100

Compare the display of the "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

Display of the Energizer Energy E500S 8GB

The "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 854, and the pixel density is 195ppi. The "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Display of the Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

When actually viewing the two phones' onscreen displays, it is obvious that they are roughly the same size. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size.

In terms of display, the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" is comparatively more suited for use with VR as it has a sleeker display. Neither the "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB" nor the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

Energizer Energy E500S 8GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?68/10068/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?60/10060/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

Camera performance of Energizer Energy E500S 8GB

The main camera of the "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Camera performance of Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

The main camera of the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 2.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones.

There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

Energizer Energy E500S 8GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?50/10050/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?65/10050/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

The processing capability of the Energizer Energy E500S 8GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB" uses the Mediatek MT6737M SoC. The CPU performance is 1.1GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.

The processing capability of the Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" uses the Broadcom BCM23550 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB", the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has more memory storage, making the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB".

For playing 2D and simpler 3D games, "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" is more suitable as the games are less likely to stall. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" than the "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB". The "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

Energizer Energy E500S 8GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet41/10070/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games11/10031/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

Battery performance of Energizer Energy E500S 8GB

The "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB" has a battery capacity of 2000.0mAh.

Battery performance of Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 500mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

If you use the phone infrequently for just making calls or checking the time, I think the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" is a bit better. For looking things up online, checking SNS, playing games occasionally or for most frequent use, it doesn't feel like there is much difference between the "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB" and the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB". Both the "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB" and the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

If you're using it frequently, for example playing games for a long time or using it to watch movies, you may feel no difference between the two devices.

Energizer Energy E500S 8GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet77/10076/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos57/10055/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

The storage capacity of the Energizer Energy E500S 8GB

The "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 8GB. The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 24GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB" is recommended over "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" if you save a lot of movies to watch on your phone, or if you save a lot of photos.

Energizer Energy E500S 8GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games35/10070/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos66/10059/100

Which to buy, the "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB" or "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB" or "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"?

When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB". If you want a larger screen, "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" is recommended as it has a 5.0inch screen. The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" also hands down has the superior specs. When comparing "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" and "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB" overall, "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.

Energizer Energy E500S 8GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Handling67/10063/100
Display48/10056/100
CPU specs26/10047/100
General rating50/10056/100

Is it recommended to buy the Energizer Energy E500S 8GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

Is it recommended to buy the Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Judging from the overall specs, the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Energizer Energy E500S 8GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Energizer Energy E500S 8GBCelkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB
Energizer Energy E500S 8GBCelkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB
ColorBlackWhite
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)71.5mm x 139.8mm x 8.6mm71.8mm x 145.6mm x 8.0mm
Weight127.0g149.0g
Display size5.0inch5.0inch
Display typeTFTIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)480 x 854720 x 1280
Pixel density195ppi293ppi
Battery capacity2000.0mAh2500.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6737MBroadcom BCM23550
CPU specs1.1GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size1.0GB2.0GB
Storage size8.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution8.0MP8.0MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP2.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles