Lava X19 (2016) 8GB vs Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB: Which is the best?
Created date: 2018-11-18 12:00:10, Updated date: 2022-05-31 16:08:03
Which do we recommend after comparing the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB".
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and the "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" or "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and the "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB"
The design of Lava X19 (2016) 8GB
The "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" is 145.5mm long, 72.6mm wide, and 8.9mm thick.
The design of Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB
The "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB" is 152.5mm long, 77.0mm wide, and 8.3mm thick. It weighs 130.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 7mm in length, 4.4mm in width, and 0.5mm in thickness. "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" is bigger than "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
Lava X19 (2016) 8GB | Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 67/100 | 60/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | - | 70/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 61/100 | 57/100 |
Compare the display of the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB"
Display of the Lava X19 (2016) 8GB
The "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Display of the Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB
The "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The display of "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" looks sleeker than that of "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB", and is more suited for everyday use such looking things up on the Internet and playing mobile games. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" nor the "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Lava X19 (2016) 8GB | Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 68/100 | 72/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 60/100 | 73/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB"
Camera performance of Lava X19 (2016) 8GB
The main camera of the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Camera performance of Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB
The main camera of the "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 2.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 5MP difference in comparison. The "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Lava X19 (2016) 8GB | Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 50/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 65/100 | 50/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB"
The processing capability of the Lava X19 (2016) 8GB
The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
The processing capability of the Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6735P SoC. The CPU performance is 1.0GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
"Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" has a slightly better CPU performance and better specs overall. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.
For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and the "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB" are not large at all. For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and the "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB" equally.
There is basically no difference between "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. Functionality is about the same for full-scale 3D games, no matter which phone model is used. The "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
Lava X19 (2016) 8GB | Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 71/100 | 67/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 32/100 | 30/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB"
Battery performance of Lava X19 (2016) 8GB
The "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" has a battery capacity of 2200.0mAh.
Battery performance of Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB
The "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2700.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 500mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you use the phone infrequently for just making calls or checking the time, I think the "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB" is a bit better. For average daily use, for example looking things up online, SNS, gaming or occasionally checking your screen I can recommend the "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB" slightly more. Both the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and the "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use.
Lava X19 (2016) 8GB | Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 76/100 | 81/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 56/100 | 64/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB"
The storage capacity of the Lava X19 (2016) 8GB
The "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage.
The storage capacity of the Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB
The "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 8GB. The "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.
Lava X19 (2016) 8GB | Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 35/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | - | 67/100 |
Which to buy, the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" or "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" or "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB"?
If you want a larger screen, "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB" is recommended as it has a 5.5inch screen. There isn't much difference between "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB" in terms of performance or specifications. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.
Lava X19 (2016) 8GB | Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | - | 61/100 |
Display | 56/100 | 61/100 |
CPU specs | 48/100 | 44/100 |
General rating | 56/100 | 59/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Lava X19 (2016) 8GB, compared with other smartphones?
The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Judging from the overall specs, the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Is it recommended to buy the Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Judging from the overall specs, the "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
What are the spec differences between the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and "Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Lava X19 (2016) 8GB | Archos 55 Cobalt Plus 16GB | |
Color | White+Gold/Gray | Blue+Gray |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 72.6mm x 145.5mm x 8.9mm | 77.0mm x 152.5mm x 8.3mm |
Weight | 130.0g | |
Display size | 5.0inch | 5.5inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 293ppi | 267ppi |
Battery capacity | 2200.0mAh | 2700.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6735P | |
CPU specs | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.0GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 2.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 8.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 2.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |