Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Lava X19 (2016) 8GB and BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB review

Created date: 2018-11-18 12:19:53, Updated date: 2022-05-31 16:27:46

Lava X19 (2016) 8GBBenQ F5 (2014) 16GB
Lava X19 (2016) 8GBBenQ F5 (2014) 16GB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB".

Lava X19 (2016) 8GBBenQ F5 (2014) 16GB
Lava X19 (2016) 8GB

BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB

General rating:

48.7/100

(The 2430th of all smartphones)

46.9/100

(The 659th of all smartphones)

Grip
- /100
64/100
Screen quality
56/100
56/100
Performance
48/100
47/100
Storage size
35/100
70/100
Battery
76/100
76/100
Rear-camera resolution
50/100
72/100
Front-camera resolution
65/100
50/100

What is the difference between the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and the "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB"

The design of Lava X19 (2016) 8GB

The "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" is 145.5mm long, 72.6mm wide, and 8.9mm thick.

The design of BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB

The "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" is 143.0mm long, 72.8mm wide, and 8.5mm thick. It weighs 135.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 2.5mm in length, 0.2mm in width, and 0.4mm in thickness. Both the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB". Both the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

Lava X19 (2016) 8GB

BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB

Ease of holding it in one hand67/10068/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand - 65/100
Ease of carrying around61/10062/100

Compare the display of the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB"

Display of the Lava X19 (2016) 8GB

The "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Display of the BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB

The "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

When actually viewing the two phones' onscreen displays, it is obvious that they are roughly the same size. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size.

There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" nor the "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

Lava X19 (2016) 8GB

BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?68/10068/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?60/10060/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB"

Camera performance of Lava X19 (2016) 8GB

The main camera of the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Camera performance of BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB

The main camera of the "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 2.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 5MP difference in comparison. The "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

Lava X19 (2016) 8GB

BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?50/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?65/10050/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB"

The processing capability of the Lava X19 (2016) 8GB

The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

The processing capability of the BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8926 Snapdragon 400 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

The CPU specs are the same for both phones. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.

For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and the "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" are not large at all. For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and the "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" equally.

There is basically no difference between "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. Functionality is about the same for full-scale 3D games, no matter which phone model is used.

Lava X19 (2016) 8GB

BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet71/10070/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games32/10031/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB"

Battery performance of Lava X19 (2016) 8GB

The "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" has a battery capacity of 2200.0mAh.

Battery performance of BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB

The "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2520.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 320mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For looking things up online, checking SNS, playing games occasionally or for most frequent use, it doesn't feel like there is much difference between the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and the "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB". Both the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and the "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

If you're using it frequently, for example playing games for a long time or using it to watch movies, you may feel no difference between the two devices.

Lava X19 (2016) 8GB

BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet76/10076/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos56/10056/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB"

The storage capacity of the Lava X19 (2016) 8GB

The "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage.

The storage capacity of the BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB

The "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 8GB. The "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.

Lava X19 (2016) 8GB

BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games35/10070/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos - 67/100

Which to buy, the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" or "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" or "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB"?

If choosing based on screen size, there is hardly any difference between "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB". There isn't much difference between "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" in terms of performance or specifications. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.

Lava X19 (2016) 8GB

BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB

Handling-64/100
Display56/10056/100
CPU specs48/10047/100
General rating56/10058/100

Is it recommended to buy the Lava X19 (2016) 8GB, compared with other smartphones?

The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Judging from the overall specs, the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

Is it recommended to buy the BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Judging from the overall specs, the "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Lava X19 (2016) 8GB" and "BenQ F5 (2014) 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Lava X19 (2016) 8GBBenQ F5 (2014) 16GB
Lava X19 (2016) 8GBBenQ F5 (2014) 16GB
ColorWhite+Gold/GrayBlack/White
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)72.6mm x 145.5mm x 8.9mm72.8mm x 143.0mm x 8.5mm
Weight135.0g
Display size5.0inch5.0inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1280720 x 1280
Pixel density293ppi293ppi
Battery capacity2200.0mAh2520.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm MSM8926 Snapdragon 400
CPU specs1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size2.0GB2.0GB
Storage size8.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution8.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP2.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles