Lava X50 (2016) 8GB vs Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB: Which is the best?
Created date: 2018-11-18 10:55:41, Updated date: 2021-10-20 17:54:04
Which do we recommend after comparing the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB".
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB | Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB | |||
General rating: | 54.1/100 (The 2304th of all smartphones) | 56.2/100 (The 1370th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | - /100 | 65/100 | ||
Screen quality | 61/100 | 56/100 | ||
Performance | - /100 | 61/100 | ||
Storage size | 35/100 | 70/100 | ||
Battery | 83/100 | 100/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 50/100 | 72/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 65/100 | 65/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and the "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" or "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and the "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB"
The design of Lava X50 (2016) 8GB
The "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" is 155.0mm long, 71.8mm wide, and 8.9mm thick.
The design of Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB
The "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB" is 139.3mm long, 69.6mm wide, and 8.5mm thick. It weighs 144.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 15.6mm in length, 2.2mm in width, and 0.4mm in thickness. Both the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB". Both the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB | Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 69/100 | 71/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | - | 58/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 62/100 | 64/100 |
Compare the display of the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB"
Display of the Lava X50 (2016) 8GB
The "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Display of the Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB
The "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The display of "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB" looks sleeker than that of "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB", and is more suited for everyday use such looking things up on the Internet and playing mobile games. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" nor the "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB | Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 72/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 73/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB"
Camera performance of Lava X50 (2016) 8GB
The main camera of the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Camera performance of Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB
The main camera of the "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 5MP difference in comparison. The "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
When shooting objects or people with the front phone camera from a short distance, such as taking a selfie with a selfie-stick, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones, even when it comes to the scenery in the background of such photographs. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB | Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 50/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 65/100 | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB"
The processing capability of the Lava X50 (2016) 8GB
The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
The processing capability of the Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8937 Snapdragon 430 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB | Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | - | 78/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | - | 43/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB"
Battery performance of Lava X50 (2016) 8GB
The "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" has a battery capacity of 2800.0mAh.
Battery performance of Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB
The "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB" has a battery capacity of 4100.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1300mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB" over the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB". Both the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and the "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB | Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 83/100 | 100/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 67/100 | 100/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB"
The storage capacity of the Lava X50 (2016) 8GB
The "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB
The "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 8GB. The "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 232GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB | Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 35/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 56/100 | 90/100 |
Which to buy, the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" or "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" or "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB"?
If you want a larger screen, "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" is recommended as it has a 5.5inch screen. Between the "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB" and the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB", the "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB" is overall the clear winner.
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB | Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | - | 65/100 |
Display | 61/100 | 56/100 |
CPU specs | - | 61/100 |
General rating | 56/100 | 68/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Lava X50 (2016) 8GB, compared with other smartphones?
The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Judging from the overall specs, the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Is it recommended to buy the Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
What are the spec differences between the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB | Xiaomi Redmi 3s 16GB | |
Color | Blue | Gold/Dark Gray/Silver |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 71.8mm x 155.0mm x 8.9mm | 69.6mm x 139.3mm x 8.5mm |
Weight | 144.0g | |
Display size | 5.5inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 267ppi | 293ppi |
Battery capacity | 2800.0mAh | 4100.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8937 Snapdragon 430 | |
CPU specs | 1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores) | |
RAM size | 2.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 8.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |