Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB vs BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB: Which is the best?
Created date: 2018-11-18 10:15:05, Updated date: 2020-04-16 12:35:09
Which do we recommend after comparing the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB".
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and the "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" or "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and the "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB"
The design of Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB
The "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" is 153.8mm long, 72.9mm wide, and 8.0mm thick. It weighs 155.0g.
The design of BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB
The "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB" is 154.3mm long, 74.9mm wide, and 7.0mm thick. It weighs 147.2g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 0.5mm in length, 2mm in width, and 1mm in thickness. Both the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB". Both the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 7.8g. "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB" weighs less than "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and is easier to handle.
Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB | BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 68/100 | 66/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 49/100 | 55/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 62/100 | 61/100 |
Compare the display of the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB"
Display of the Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB
The "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1440, and the pixel density is 282ppi. The "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" has a 5.7inch screen size.
Display of the BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB
The "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB" uses a AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 400ppi. The "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.2inch difference in the display sizes. When actually viewing the two phones' onscreen displays, it is obvious that they are roughly the same size. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and the "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size. Both the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and the "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB". The "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB | BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 73/100 | 72/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 75/100 | 73/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB"
Camera performance of Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB
The main camera of the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 13.0MP.
Camera performance of BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB
The main camera of the "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB" has 16.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 3MP difference in comparison. As for taking photos of scenic places or group photos of people, the rear camera of "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB" is more suited for capturing distant objects. The "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and the "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 5MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB | BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 80/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 100/100 | 80/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB"
The processing capability of the Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" uses the Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
The processing capability of the BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB" uses the Mediatek MT6755 Helio P10 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.9GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB", the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB" has more memory storage, making the "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" is the better choice to buy over the "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB". Both the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and the "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Functionality is about the same for full-scale 3D games, no matter which phone model is used. Both the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and the "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB | BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 92/100 | 84/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 76/100 | 78/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB"
Battery performance of Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB
The "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.
Battery performance of BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB
The "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For looking things up online, checking SNS, playing games occasionally or for most frequent use, it doesn't feel like there is much difference between the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and the "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB". Both the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and the "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and the "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB | BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 92/100 | 87/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 82/100 | 74/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB"
The storage capacity of the Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB
The "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB
The "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 32GB. "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 160GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. Both the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and the "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB | BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 78/100 | 84/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 90/100 | 75/100 |
Which to buy, the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" or "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" or "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB"?
When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB". Its perfect screen size of 5.5inch makes the "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB" a lot easier to use. There isn't much difference between "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB" in terms of performance or specifications. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.
Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB | BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 61/100 | 61/100 |
Display | 63/100 | 74/100 |
CPU specs | 85/100 | 81/100 |
General rating | 75/100 | 75/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Is it recommended to buy the BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
What are the spec differences between the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and "BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB | BLU Pure XR (2016) 64GB | |
Color | Black/Blue | Gray/Gold |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 72.9mm x 153.8mm x 8.0mm | 74.9mm x 154.3mm x 7.0mm |
Weight | 155.0g | 147.2g |
Display size | 5.7inch | 5.5inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1440 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 282ppi | 400ppi |
Battery capacity | 3000.0mAh | 3000.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 | Mediatek MT6755 Helio P10 |
CPU specs | 2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.9GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 3.0GB | 4.0GB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 64.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 16.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |