Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB vs. Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB Specs & Scores

Created date: 2018-11-18 10:48:12, Updated date: 2020-04-16 19:52:54

Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GBLava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB
Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GBLava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB

How are the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GBLava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB
Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB

Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB

General rating:
Griprating-image3.1
72.9mm x 153.8mm x 8.0mm
rating-image3.6
64.5mm x 125.5mm x 11.4mm
Screen qualityrating-image3.2
IPS LCD, 5.7inch, 720 x 1440
rating-image1.7
TFT, 4.0inch, 480 x 800
Performancerating-image4.3
Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22, 2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores), 3.0GB
rating-image1
1.2GHz×2(2.0-cores), 256.0MB
Storage sizerating-image3.9
32.0GB
rating-image1
512.0MB
Batteryrating-image4.6
3000.0mAh
rating-image2.8
1500.0mAh
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image3.6
13.0MP
rating-image3.9
15.0MP
Front-camera resolutionrating-image5.0
13.0MP
rating-image

What is the difference between the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and the "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB"

The design of Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB

The "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" is 153.8mm long, 72.9mm wide, and 8.0mm thick. It weighs 155.0g.

The design of Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB

The "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" is 125.5mm long, 64.5mm wide, and 11.4mm thick. It weighs 124.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 28.3mm in length, 8.4mm in width, and 3.4mm in thickness. "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" is bigger than "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 31g. The "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB

Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB

Ease of holding it in one hand68/10074/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand49/10074/100
Ease of carrying around62/10066/100

Compare the display of the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB"

Display of the Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB

The "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1440, and the pixel density is 282ppi. The "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" has a 5.7inch screen size.

Display of the Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB

The "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 800, and the pixel density is 233ppi. The "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" has a 4.0inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 1.7inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

In terms of display, the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" nor the "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB

Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?73/10046/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?75/10025/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB"

Camera performance of Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB

The main camera of the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 13.0MP.

Camera performance of Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB

The main camera of the "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" has 15.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 2MP difference in comparison. There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, for taking photos of objects in close proximity such as desserts or food that can be posted on Instagram, the camera of "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" has a better performance. Both the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and the "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB

Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?72/10077/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?100/100 -

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB"

The processing capability of the Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" uses the Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.

The processing capability of the Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB

The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 256.0MB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB", the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 253GB difference in memory capacity. The "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB". The "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

The "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" than the "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB". The "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB

Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet92/10027/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games76/1004/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB"

Battery performance of Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB

The "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.

Battery performance of Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB

The "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" has a battery capacity of 1500.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1500mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" over the "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB". The "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB

Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet92/10055/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos82/10033/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB"

The storage capacity of the Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB

The "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB

The "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" has 512.0MB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 480GB. The "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 256GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB

Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games78/1002/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos90/10054/100

Which to buy, the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" or "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" or "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.7inch makes the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" a lot easier to use. The "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and the "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB", the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" is overall the clear winner.

Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB

Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB

Handling61/10072/100
Display63/10034/100
CPU specs85/10015/100
General rating75/10037/100

Is it recommended to buy the Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GB" and "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GBLava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB
Lenovo K9 (2018) 32GBLava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB
ColorBlack/BlueMetallic Brown/Metallic Grey/Metallic White
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)72.9mm x 153.8mm x 8.0mm64.5mm x 125.5mm x 11.4mm
Weight155.0g124.0g
Display size5.7inch4.0inch
Display typeIPS LCDTFT
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1440480 x 800
Pixel density282ppi233ppi
Battery capacity3000.0mAh1500.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6762 Helio P22
CPU specs2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.2GHz×2(2.0-cores)
RAM size3.0GB256.0MB
Storage size32.0GB512.0MB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP15.0MP
Front-camera resolution13.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles