Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB vs Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB: Full Comparison!

Created date: 2018-11-18 11:55:31, Updated date: 2020-04-16 22:46:05

Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GBSamsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB
Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GBSamsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB".

Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GBSamsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB
Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB

Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB

General rating:
Griprating-image
- /100
rating-image3.9
77/100
Screen qualityrating-image2.8
56/100
rating-image2.7
53/100
Performancerating-image2.4
48/100
rating-image3.0
59/100
Storage sizerating-image3.5
70/100
rating-image3.9
78/100
Batteryrating-image5.0
100/100
rating-image3.2
63/100
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image2.5
50/100
rating-image3.5
70/100
Front-camera resolutionrating-image3.3
65/100
rating-image2.3
45/100

What is the difference between the "Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB"

The design of Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB

The "Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB" is 144.3mm long, 72.4mm wide, and 9.7mm thick.

The design of Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB

The "Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB" is 132.4mm long, 65.5mm wide, and 6.7mm thick. It weighs 115.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 11.9mm in length, 6.9mm in width, and 2mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB" is more compact than "Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.

Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB

Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB

Ease of holding it in one hand66/10079/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand - 82/100
Ease of carrying around61/10070/100

Compare the display of the "Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB"

Display of the Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB

The "Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Display of the Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB

The "Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 312ppi. The "Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB" has a 4.7inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.2inch difference in the display sizes. When you actually look at the screen, "Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB" feels like it has a slightly bigger display. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. In the gaming end, the "Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size.

The display of "Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB" looks sleeker than that of "Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB", and is more suited for everyday use such looking things up on the Internet and playing mobile games. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. The "Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB

Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?68/10063/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?60/10048/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB"

Camera performance of Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB

The main camera of the "Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Camera performance of Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB

The main camera of the "Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB" has 12.0MP. The front camera has 1.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 4MP difference in comparison. The "Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

There is a 4MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB

Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?50/10070/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?65/10045/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB"

The processing capability of the Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6737 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

The processing capability of the Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB" uses the Exynos 5430 Octa SoC. The CPU performance is 1.8GHz+1.3GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB", the "Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.

For using fundamental features such as calls, emails, messages and using SNS, I am more inclined to recommend the "Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB".

The "Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. For playing more memory-intensive 3D games, it is better to go with "Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB" as it has better performance.

Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB

Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet71/10077/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games32/10041/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB"

Battery performance of Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB

The "Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB" has a battery capacity of 4000.0mAh.

Battery performance of Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB

The "Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB" has a battery capacity of 1860.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 2140mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB" over the "Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB". The "Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB

Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/10063/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos100/10040/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB"

The storage capacity of the Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB

The "Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB

The "Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 16GB. "Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here.

Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.

Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB

Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games70/10078/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos59/100 -

Which to buy, the "Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB" or "Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB" or "Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB"?

If choosing based on screen size, there is hardly any difference between "Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB". The "Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.

Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB

Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB

Handling-77/100
Display56/10053/100
CPU specs48/10059/100
General rating62/10060/100

Is it recommended to buy the Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GBSamsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB
Micromax Canvas Evok Power Q4260 16GBSamsung Galaxy Alpha 32GB
ColorChampagne GoldCharcoal Black/Sleek Silver/Dazzling White/Frosted Gold/Scuba Blue
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)72.4mm x 144.3mm x 9.7mm65.5mm x 132.4mm x 6.7mm
Weight115.0g
Display size5.0inch4.7inch
Display typeIPS LCDSuper AMOLED
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1280720 x 1280
Pixel density293ppi312ppi
Battery capacity4000.0mAh1860.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6737Exynos 5430 Octa
CPU specs1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.8GHz+1.3GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size2.0GB2.0GB
Storage size16.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution8.0MP12.0MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP1.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles