Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB vs MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB
Created date: 2018-11-18 12:16:27, Updated date: 2020-04-15 20:39:53
Which do we recommend after comparing the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB".
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" and the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" or "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" and the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
The design of Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB
The "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" is 152.4mm long, 72.2mm wide, and 8.3mm thick. It weighs 141.0g.
The design of MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB
The "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is 142.8mm long, 70.4mm wide, and 8.4mm thick. It weighs 125.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
Both the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB". Both the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 16g. The "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB | MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 69/100 | 71/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 60/100 | 74/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 62/100 | 64/100 |
Compare the display of the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
Display of the Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB
The "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1440, and the pixel density is 282ppi. The "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" has a 5.7inch screen size.
Display of the MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB
The "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" uses a IPS liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.7inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. The "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" nor the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB | MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 73/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 75/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
Camera performance of Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB
The main camera of the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Camera performance of MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB
The main camera of the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 2.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 5MP difference in comparison. The "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB | MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 50/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 65/100 | 50/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
The processing capability of the Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB
The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
The processing capability of the MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" uses the Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB", the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 2GB difference in memory capacity. The "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" is the better choice to buy over the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB".
The "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" than the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB". The "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB | MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 73/100 | 44/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 45/100 | 11/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
Battery performance of Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB
The "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.
Battery performance of MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB
The "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has a battery capacity of 2300.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 700mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" over the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB". Both the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" and the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB | MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 92/100 | 75/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 82/100 | 54/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
The storage capacity of the Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB
The "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB
The "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 24GB. The "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 88GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB | MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 78/100 | 35/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 78/100 | 66/100 |
Which to buy, the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" or "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" or "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"?
When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB". If you want a larger screen, "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" is recommended as it has a 5.7inch screen. The "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" and the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB", the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" is overall the clear winner.
Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB | MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 64/100 | 69/100 |
Display | 63/100 | 56/100 |
CPU specs | 56/100 | 27/100 |
General rating | 68/100 | 50/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Panasonic Eluga Ray 530 32GB | MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB | |
Color | Black/Blue | |
OS | Android | Windows |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 72.2mm x 152.4mm x 8.3mm | 70.4mm x 142.8mm x 8.4mm |
Weight | 141.0g | 125.0g |
Display size | 5.7inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1440 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 282ppi | 293ppi |
Battery capacity | 3000.0mAh | 2300.0mAh |
Chipset | Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 | |
CPU specs | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 3.0GB | 1.0GB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 8.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 8.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 2.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |