Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Razer Phone 2 64GB vs Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB

Created date: 2018-11-18 10:19:34, Updated date: 2020-04-16 18:31:11

Razer Phone 2 64GBGalaxy J5 (2017) 32GB
Razer Phone 2 64GBGalaxy J5 (2017) 32GB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" and "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" and "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB".

Razer Phone 2 64GBGalaxy J5 (2017) 32GB
Razer Phone 2 64GB

Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB

General rating:
Griprating-image2.1
42/100
rating-image3.1
61/100
Screen qualityrating-image4.2
84/100
rating-image3.0
60/100
Performancerating-image4.9
98/100
rating-image4.0
79/100
Storage sizerating-image4.2
84/100
rating-image3.9
78/100
Batteryrating-image5.0
100/100
rating-image4.7
94/100
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image3.5
70/100
rating-image3.6
72/100
Front-camera resolutionrating-image4.0
80/100
rating-image5.0
100/100

What is the difference between the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" and the "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" and "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB"

The design of Razer Phone 2 64GB

The "Razer Phone 2 64GB" is 158.5mm long, 79.0mm wide, and 8.5mm thick. It weighs 220.0g.

The design of Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB

The "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB" is 146.2mm long, 71.3mm wide, and 8.0mm thick. It weighs 160.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 12.3mm in length, 7.7mm in width, and 0.5mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB" is more compact than "Razer Phone 2 64GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.

The difference in weight is 60g. The "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

Razer Phone 2 64GB

Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB

Ease of holding it in one hand55/10070/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand6/10046/100
Ease of carrying around55/10063/100

Compare the display of the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" and "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB"

Display of the Razer Phone 2 64GB

The "Razer Phone 2 64GB" uses a IGZO IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1440 x 2560, and the pixel density is 513ppi. The "Razer Phone 2 64GB" has a 5.72inch screen size.

Display of the Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB

The "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 282ppi. The "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB" has a 5.2inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.51inch difference in the display sizes. When you actually look at the screen, "Razer Phone 2 64GB" feels like it has a slightly bigger display. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" and the "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. If you compare how well the different phones support mobile games, the display size of "Razer Phone 2 64GB" makes it more suited for playing games. Both the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" and the "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Razer Phone 2 64GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB". The "Razer Phone 2 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

Razer Phone 2 64GB

Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?74/10070/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?75/10070/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" and "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB"

Camera performance of Razer Phone 2 64GB

The main camera of the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" has 12.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Camera performance of Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB

The main camera of the "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 13.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 1MP difference in comparison. There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "Razer Phone 2 64GB" and "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" and the "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is a 5MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

Razer Phone 2 64GB

Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?70/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?80/100100/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" and "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB"

The processing capability of the Razer Phone 2 64GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" uses the Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.8GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 8.0GB.

The processing capability of the Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB" uses the Exynos 7870 Octa SoC. The CPU performance is 1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB", the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 5GB difference in memory capacity. The "Razer Phone 2 64GB" has more memory storage, making the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB". For people who mostly use their phone to look up things on the internet, watch videos, or occasionally play mini games, the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" edges out the competition. Both the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" and the "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The "Razer Phone 2 64GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" than the "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB". Both the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" and the "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Razer Phone 2 64GB

Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet100/10086/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games97/10070/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" and "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB"

Battery performance of Razer Phone 2 64GB

The "Razer Phone 2 64GB" has a battery capacity of 4000.0mAh.

Battery performance of Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB

The "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1000mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "Razer Phone 2 64GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For average daily use, for example looking things up online, SNS, gaming or occasionally checking your screen I can recommend the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" slightly more. Both the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" and the "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" and the "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Razer Phone 2 64GB

Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/10094/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos100/10085/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" and "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB"

The storage capacity of the Razer Phone 2 64GB

The "Razer Phone 2 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 1024.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB

The "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 32GB. "Razer Phone 2 64GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Razer Phone 2 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 800GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. "Razer Phone 2 64GB" is recommended over "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB" if you save a lot of movies to watch on your phone, or if you save a lot of photos. Both the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" and the "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Razer Phone 2 64GB

Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games84/10078/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos96/10090/100

Which to buy, the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" or "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" or "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.72inch makes the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" a lot easier to use. The "Razer Phone 2 64GB" also hands down has the superior specs. When comparing "Razer Phone 2 64GB" and "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB" overall, "Razer Phone 2 64GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.

Razer Phone 2 64GB

Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB

Handling42/10061/100
Display84/10060/100
CPU specs98/10079/100
General rating79/10074/100

Is it recommended to buy the Razer Phone 2 64GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" and "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" and "Galaxy J5 (2017) 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Razer Phone 2 64GBGalaxy J5 (2017) 32GB
Razer Phone 2 64GBGalaxy J5 (2017) 32GB
ColorMirror back/Rugged satinBlue/Pink/Gold/Black
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)79.0mm x 158.5mm x 8.5mm71.3mm x 146.2mm x 8.0mm
Weight220.0g160.0g
Display size5.72inch5.2inch
Display typeIGZO IPS LCDSuper AMOLED
Screen resolution (width x height)1440 x 2560720 x 1280
Pixel density513ppi282ppi
Battery capacity4000.0mAh3000.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845Exynos 7870 Octa
CPU specs2.8GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size8.0GB3.0GB
Storage size64.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution12.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP13.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles