Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB vs BQ Aquaris U 16GB
Created date: 2018-11-18 11:58:31, Updated date: 2021-10-20 19:10:41
Which do we recommend after comparing the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB".
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" and the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" or "BQ Aquaris U 16GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" and the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB"
The design of Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB
The "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" is 161.9mm long, 76.4mm wide, and 8.8mm thick. It weighs 201.0g.
The design of BQ Aquaris U 16GB
The "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is 145.0mm long, 71.5mm wide, and 8.3mm thick. It weighs 140.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 16.9mm in length, 4.9mm in width, and 0.5mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" easier to use and carry around. "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is bigger than "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Also, "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is more compact than "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.
The difference in weight is 61g. The "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB | BQ Aquaris U 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 60/100 | 70/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 18/100 | 61/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 57/100 | 63/100 |
Compare the display of the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB"
Display of the Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB
The "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1440 x 2960, and the pixel density is 514ppi. The "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" has a 6.4inch screen size.
Display of the BQ Aquaris U 16GB
The "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1.4inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB". The "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB | BQ Aquaris U 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 79/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 83/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB"
Camera performance of Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB
The main camera of the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" has 12.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Camera performance of BQ Aquaris U 16GB
The main camera of the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 1MP difference in comparison. There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" and the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB | BQ Aquaris U 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 70/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 80/100 | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB"
The processing capability of the Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" uses the Exynos 9810 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.7GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 8.0GB.
The processing capability of the BQ Aquaris U 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8937 Snapdragon 430 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB", the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 6GB difference in memory capacity. The "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" has more memory storage, making the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" is the better choice to buy over the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB". Both the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" and the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" than the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB". The "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB | BQ Aquaris U 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 100/100 | 78/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 97/100 | 43/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB"
Battery performance of Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB
The "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" has a battery capacity of 4000.0mAh.
Battery performance of BQ Aquaris U 16GB
The "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" has a battery capacity of 3080.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 920mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For average daily use, for example looking things up online, SNS, gaming or occasionally checking your screen I can recommend the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" slightly more. Both the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" and the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" and the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB | BQ Aquaris U 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 94/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 86/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB"
The storage capacity of the Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB
The "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" has 512.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 1024.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the BQ Aquaris U 16GB
The "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 496GB. The "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 1264GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" is recommended over "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" if you save a lot of movies to watch on your phone, or if you save a lot of photos. Both the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" and the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB | BQ Aquaris U 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 93/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 97/100 | 90/100 |
Which to buy, the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" or "BQ Aquaris U 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" or "BQ Aquaris U 16GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 6.4inch makes the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" a lot easier to use. The "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" and the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB", the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" is overall the clear winner.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB | BQ Aquaris U 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 48/100 | 65/100 |
Display | 89/100 | 56/100 |
CPU specs | 98/100 | 61/100 |
General rating | 83/100 | 66/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" is a high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the BQ Aquaris U 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB | BQ Aquaris U 16GB | |
Color | Metallic Copper/Lavender Purple/Ocean Blue/Midnight Black/Pure White/Alpine White | Black |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 76.4mm x 161.9mm x 8.8mm | 71.5mm x 145.0mm x 8.3mm |
Weight | 201.0g | 140.0g |
Display size | 6.4inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1440 x 2960 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 514ppi | 293ppi |
Battery capacity | 4000.0mAh | 3080.0mAh |
Chipset | Exynos 9810 | Qualcomm MSM8937 Snapdragon 430 |
CPU specs | 2.7GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 8.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 512.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 12.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |