Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Which one is better, the Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB or Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!

Created date: 2018-11-18 11:37:07, Updated date: 2021-10-20 21:26:26

Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GBXiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB
Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GBXiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB

How are the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GBXiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB
Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB

Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB

General rating:
Griprating-image3.6
72/100
rating-image3.0
59/100
Screen qualityrating-image4.0
79/100
rating-image3.7
73/100
Performancerating-image4.5
90/100
rating-image4.8
96/100
Storage sizerating-image4.2
84/100
rating-image4.5
90/100
Batteryrating-image4.5
90/100
rating-image5.0
100/100
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image2.0
40/100
rating-image3.5
70/100
Front-camera resolutionrating-image4.0
80/100
rating-image4.0
80/100

What is the difference between the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and the "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB"

The design of Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB

The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is 131.0mm long, 64.0mm wide, and 9.3mm thick. It weighs 135.0g.

The design of Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB

The "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB" is 145.2mm long, 70.5mm wide, and 7.5mm thick. It weighs 182.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 14.1mm in length, 6.5mm in width, and 1.8mm in thickness. "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is bigger than "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 47g. The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB

Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB

Ease of holding it in one hand78/10071/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand65/10031/100
Ease of carrying around69/10064/100

Compare the display of the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB"

Display of the Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB

The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" uses a IGZO IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2280, and the pixel density is 485ppi. The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" has a 5.2inch screen size.

Display of the Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB

The "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 427ppi. The "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB" has a 5.15inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.04inch difference in the display sizes. When actually viewing the two phones' onscreen displays, it is obvious that they are roughly the same size. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size. The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The display of "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" looks sleeker than that of "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB", and is more suited for everyday use such looking things up on the Internet and playing mobile games. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB". Both the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and the "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB

Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?70/10069/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?70/10067/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB"

Camera performance of Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB

The main camera of the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" has 6.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Camera performance of Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB

The main camera of the "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB" has 12.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 6MP difference in comparison. The "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

When shooting objects or people with the front phone camera from a short distance, such as taking a selfie with a selfie-stick, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones, even when it comes to the scenery in the background of such photographs. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.

Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB

Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?40/10070/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?80/10080/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB"

The processing capability of the Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" uses the Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.6GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.

The processing capability of the Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.45GHz+1.9GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 6.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

"Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB" has a slightly better CPU performance and better specs overall. This is a 2GB difference in memory capacity. The memory of "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB" is slightly larger, so "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB" is recommended over "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" for multitasking.

For using fundamental features such as calls, emails, messages and using SNS, I am more inclined to recommend the "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB". For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and the "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB" equally. Both the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and the "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is basically no difference between "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. For playing more memory-intensive 3D games, it is better to go with "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB" as it has better performance. Both the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and the "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB

Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet93/100100/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games87/10094/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB"

Battery performance of Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB

The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.

Battery performance of Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB

The "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB" has a battery capacity of 3350.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 850mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB" over the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB". Both the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and the "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and the "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB

Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet90/100100/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos78/10098/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB"

The storage capacity of the Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB

The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 1024.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB

The "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB" has 128.0GB of internal memory.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 64GB. "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" unfortunately falls behind here. Both the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and the "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.

Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB

Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games84/10090/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos96/100 -

Which to buy, the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" or "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" or "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is a great choice. If you want a larger screen, "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is recommended as it has a 5.2inch screen. "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB" is better for users who prefer better functionality and specs. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.

Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB

Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB

Handling72/10059/100
Display79/10073/100
CPU specs90/10096/100
General rating77/10078/100

Is it recommended to buy the Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GBXiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB
Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GBXiaomi Mi 6 (2017) 128GB
ColorSmokey Green/Deep White/Pure BlackCeramic Black/Black/Blue/White
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)64.0mm x 131.0mm x 9.3mm70.5mm x 145.2mm x 7.5mm
Weight135.0g182.0g
Display size5.2inch5.15inch
Display typeIGZO IPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 22801080 x 1920
Pixel density485ppi427ppi
Battery capacity2500.0mAh3350.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835
CPU specs2.6GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores)2.45GHz+1.9GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size4.0GB6.0GB
Storage size64.0GB128.0GB
Rear-camera resolution6.0MP12.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP8.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles