Which one is better, the Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB or Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!
Created date: 2018-11-18 12:11:39, Updated date: 2021-10-20 22:00:58
How are the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" or "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB"
The design of Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB
The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is 131.0mm long, 64.0mm wide, and 9.3mm thick. It weighs 135.0g.
The design of Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB
The "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" is 138.1mm long, 69.6mm wide, and 7.8mm thick. It weighs 132.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 7mm in length, 5.5mm in width, and 1.5mm in thickness. "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is bigger than "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 3g. There is very little difference in weight between the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB", meaning that the burden on the hands even when used for a long time is pretty much the same.
Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB | Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 78/100 | 72/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 65/100 | 68/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 69/100 | 65/100 |
Compare the display of the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB"
Display of the Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB
The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" uses a IGZO IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2280, and the pixel density is 485ppi. The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" has a 5.2inch screen size.
Display of the Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB
The "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 440ppi. The "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.2inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The display of "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" looks sleeker than that of "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB", and is more suited for everyday use such looking things up on the Internet and playing mobile games. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB". Both the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB | Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 70/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 70/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB"
Camera performance of Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB
The main camera of the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" has 6.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Camera performance of Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB
The main camera of the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 7MP difference in comparison. The "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB | Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 40/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 80/100 | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB"
The processing capability of the Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" uses the Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.6GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.
The processing capability of the Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8992 Snapdragon 808 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×6(6.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB", the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" has more memory storage, making the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB". Both the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" than the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB". The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB | Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 93/100 | 78/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 87/100 | 52/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB"
Battery performance of Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB
The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.
Battery performance of Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB
The "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3080.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 580mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you use the phone infrequently for just making calls or checking the time, I think the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" is a bit better. For looking things up online, checking SNS, playing games occasionally or for most frequent use, it doesn't feel like there is much difference between the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB". Both the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
If you're using it frequently, for example playing games for a long time or using it to watch movies, you may feel no difference between the two devices. Both the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB | Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 90/100 | 90/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 78/100 | 79/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB"
The storage capacity of the Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB
The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 1024.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB
The "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 32GB. "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.
Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB | Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 84/100 | 78/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 96/100 | - |
Which to buy, the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" or "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" or "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB"?
When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB". If you want a larger screen, "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is recommended as it has a 5.2inch screen. The "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" also hands down has the superior specs. When comparing "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" overall, "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.
Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB | Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 72/100 | 69/100 |
Display | 79/100 | 70/100 |
CPU specs | 90/100 | 65/100 |
General rating | 77/100 | 70/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB" and "Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Sharp AQUOSR2 compact 64GB | Xiaomi Mi 4c 32GB | |
Color | Smokey Green/Deep White/Pure Black | White/grey/pink/yellow/blue |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 64.0mm x 131.0mm x 9.3mm | 69.6mm x 138.1mm x 7.8mm |
Weight | 135.0g | 132.0g |
Display size | 5.2inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | IGZO IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2280 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 485ppi | 440ppi |
Battery capacity | 2500.0mAh | 3080.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 | Qualcomm MSM8992 Snapdragon 808 |
CPU specs | 2.6GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×6(6.0-cores) |
RAM size | 4.0GB | 3.0GB |
Storage size | 64.0GB | 32.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 6.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |