Compare Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB vs Lava X28 (2016) 8GB
Created date: 2018-11-18 11:27:00, Updated date: 2020-04-15 22:24:28
Which do we recommend after comparing the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB".
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and the "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" or "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and the "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB"
The design of Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB
The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" is 148.2mm long, 74.2mm wide, and 8.0mm thick. It weighs 165.0g.
The design of Lava X28 (2016) 8GB
The "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB" is 155.0mm long, 78.0mm wide, and 9.0mm thick.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 6.8mm in length, 3.7mm in width, and 1mm in thickness. "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" is bigger than "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Also, "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" is more compact than "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.
Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB | Lava X28 (2016) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 66/100 | 56/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 42/100 | - |
Ease of carrying around | 61/100 | 56/100 |
Compare the display of the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB"
Display of the Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB
The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2160, and the pixel density is 403ppi. The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" has a 5.99inch screen size.
Display of the Lava X28 (2016) 8GB
The "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.49inch difference in the display sizes. When you actually look at the screen, "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" feels like it has a slightly bigger display. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and the "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. If you compare how well the different phones support mobile games, the display size of "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" makes it more suited for playing games. Both the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and the "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB". The "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB | Lava X28 (2016) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 76/100 | 72/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 78/100 | 73/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB"
Camera performance of Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB
The main camera of the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 16.0MP.
Camera performance of Lava X28 (2016) 8GB
The main camera of the "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 5MP difference in comparison. The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
There is a 11MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB | Lava X28 (2016) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 50/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 100/100 | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB"
The processing capability of the Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" uses the Qualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.6GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.
The processing capability of the Lava X28 (2016) 8GB
The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB", the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 3GB difference in memory capacity. The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" has more memory storage, making the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB". The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" than the "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB". The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB | Lava X28 (2016) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 94/100 | 47/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 88/100 | 12/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB"
Battery performance of Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB
The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" has a battery capacity of 2900.0mAh.
Battery performance of Lava X28 (2016) 8GB
The "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB" has a battery capacity of 2600.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 300mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" over the "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB". Both the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and the "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB | Lava X28 (2016) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 87/100 | 80/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 73/100 | 61/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB"
The storage capacity of the Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB
The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Lava X28 (2016) 8GB
The "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 56GB. The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 280GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB | Lava X28 (2016) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 84/100 | 35/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 91/100 | 56/100 |
Which to buy, the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" or "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" or "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB"?
Its perfect screen size of 5.99inch makes the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" a lot easier to use. The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and the "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB", the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" is overall the clear winner.
Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB | Lava X28 (2016) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 58/100 | - |
Display | 77/100 | 61/100 |
CPU specs | 91/100 | 28/100 |
General rating | 79/100 | 50/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the Lava X28 (2016) 8GB, compared with other smartphones?
The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Lava X28 (2016) 8GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB | Lava X28 (2016) 8GB | |
Color | Black | Black+Gold |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 74.2mm x 148.2mm x 8.0mm | 78.0mm x 155.0mm x 9.0mm |
Weight | 165.0g | |
Display size | 5.99inch | 5.5inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2160 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 403ppi | 267ppi |
Battery capacity | 2900.0mAh | 2600.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630 | |
CPU specs | 2.6GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 4.0GB | 1.0GB |
Storage size | 64.0GB | 8.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 8.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 16.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |