Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB vs BLU Win JR LTE
Created date: 2018-11-18 11:56:05, Updated date: 2020-04-16 21:01:06
Which do we recommend after comparing the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE".
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | BLU Win JR LTE | |||
General rating: | 67.7/100 (The 3505th of all smartphones) | 37.9/100 (The 2747th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 65/100 | 68/100 | ||
Screen quality | 76/100 | 41/100 | ||
Performance | 88/100 | 23/100 | ||
Storage size | 84/100 | 17/100 | ||
Battery | 88/100 | 74/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 70/100 | 35/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 80/100 | - /100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and the "BLU Win JR LTE"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" or "BLU Win JR LTE"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE" ?
What is the difference between the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and the "BLU Win JR LTE"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE"
The design of Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB
The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" is 141.8mm long, 72.0mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 140.0g.
The design of BLU Win JR LTE
The "BLU Win JR LTE" is 133.0mm long, 67.5mm wide, and 9.5mm thick. It weighs 138.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 8.8mm in length, 4.5mm in width, and 1.5mm in thickness. Both the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE". Both the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 2g. There is very little difference in weight between the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE", meaning that the burden on the hands even when used for a long time is pretty much the same.
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | BLU Win JR LTE | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 70/100 | 72/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 61/100 | 63/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 63/100 | 65/100 |
Compare the display of the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE"
Display of the Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB
The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2040, and the pixel density is 419ppi. The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Display of the BLU Win JR LTE
The "BLU Win JR LTE" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 854, and the pixel density is 217ppi. The "BLU Win JR LTE" has a 4.5inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "BLU Win JR LTE". The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "BLU Win JR LTE" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | BLU Win JR LTE | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 72/100 | 59/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 73/100 | 41/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE"
Camera performance of Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB
The main camera of the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" has 12.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Camera performance of BLU Win JR LTE
The main camera of the "BLU Win JR LTE" has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 7MP difference in comparison. The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | BLU Win JR LTE | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 70/100 | 35/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 80/100 | - |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE"
The processing capability of the Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" uses the Qualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.
The processing capability of the BLU Win JR LTE
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "BLU Win JR LTE" uses the Qualcomm MSM8916 Snapdragon 410 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "BLU Win JR LTE", the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 508GB difference in memory capacity. The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" has more memory storage, making the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" is the better choice to buy over the "BLU Win JR LTE". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB". The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" than the "BLU Win JR LTE". The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "BLU Win JR LTE" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | BLU Win JR LTE | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 90/100 | 44/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 85/100 | 6/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE"
Battery performance of Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB
The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" has a battery capacity of 2700.0mAh.
Battery performance of BLU Win JR LTE
The "BLU Win JR LTE" has a battery capacity of 2000.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 700mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" over the "BLU Win JR LTE". Both the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and the "BLU Win JR LTE" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | BLU Win JR LTE | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 88/100 | 74/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 75/100 | 52/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE"
The storage capacity of the Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB
The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the BLU Win JR LTE
The "BLU Win JR LTE" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 60GB. The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "BLU Win JR LTE" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "BLU Win JR LTE" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 284GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | BLU Win JR LTE | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 84/100 | 17/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 91/100 | 55/100 |
Which to buy, the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" or "BLU Win JR LTE"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" or "BLU Win JR LTE"?
When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE". Its perfect screen size of 5.5inch makes the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" a lot easier to use. The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and the "BLU Win JR LTE", the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" is overall the clear winner.
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | BLU Win JR LTE | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 65/100 | 68/100 |
Display | 76/100 | 41/100 |
CPU specs | 88/100 | 23/100 |
General rating | 77/100 | 43/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the BLU Win JR LTE, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "BLU Win JR LTE" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "BLU Win JR LTE" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "BLU Win JR LTE". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | BLU Win JR LTE | |
Color | Black | Grey/White/Orange/Yellow/Pink |
OS | Android | Windows |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 72.0mm x 141.8mm x 7.9mm | 67.5mm x 133.0mm x 9.5mm |
Weight | 140.0g | 138.0g |
Display size | 5.5inch | 4.5inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2040 | 480 x 854 |
Pixel density | 419ppi | 217ppi |
Battery capacity | 2700.0mAh | 2000.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630 | Qualcomm MSM8916 Snapdragon 410 |
CPU specs | 2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 4.0GB | 512.0MB |
Storage size | 64.0GB | 4.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 12.0MP | 5.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |