Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB vs DIGNO W KYV40: Full Comparison!

Created date: 2018-11-18 12:12:00, Updated date: 2020-04-15 19:02:19

Sharp R1S (2018) 32GBDIGNO W KYV40
Sharp R1S (2018) 32GBDIGNO W KYV40

Which do we recommend after comparing the "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" and "DIGNO W KYV40"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" and "DIGNO W KYV40".

Sharp R1S (2018) 32GBDIGNO W KYV40
Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB

DIGNO W KYV40

General rating:
Griprating-image
- /100
rating-image3.0
59/100
Screen qualityrating-image3.1
61/100
rating-image2.8
56/100
Performancerating-image3.3
66/100
rating-image2.7
54/100
Storage sizerating-image3.9
78/100
rating-image3.5
70/100
Batteryrating-image5.0
100/100
rating-image4.8
96/100
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image3.6
72/100
rating-image3.6
72/100
Front-camera resolutionrating-image3.3
65/100
rating-image3.3
65/100

What is the difference between the "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" and the "DIGNO W KYV40"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" and "DIGNO W KYV40"

The design of Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB

The design of DIGNO W KYV40

The "DIGNO W KYV40" is 142.0mm long, 71.0mm wide, and 10.4mm thick. It weighs 159.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB

DIGNO W KYV40

Ease of holding it in one hand - 67/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand - 46/100
Ease of carrying around - 61/100

Compare the display of the "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" and "DIGNO W KYV40"

Display of the Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB

The "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Display of the DIGNO W KYV40

The "DIGNO W KYV40" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "DIGNO W KYV40" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The display of "DIGNO W KYV40" looks sleeker than that of "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB", and is more suited for everyday use such looking things up on the Internet and playing mobile games. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" nor the "DIGNO W KYV40" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB

DIGNO W KYV40

How suited is the screen for usual usage?72/10068/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?73/10060/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" and "DIGNO W KYV40"

Camera performance of Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB

The main camera of the "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Camera performance of DIGNO W KYV40

The main camera of the "DIGNO W KYV40" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" and "DIGNO W KYV40" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" and the "DIGNO W KYV40" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

When shooting objects or people with the front phone camera from a short distance, such as taking a selfie with a selfie-stick, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones, even when it comes to the scenery in the background of such photographs. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" and "DIGNO W KYV40" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.

Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB

DIGNO W KYV40

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?72/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?65/10065/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" and "DIGNO W KYV40"

The processing capability of the Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" uses the Mediatek MT6750 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.

The processing capability of the DIGNO W KYV40

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "DIGNO W KYV40" uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.4GHz+1.1GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "DIGNO W KYV40", the "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" and the "DIGNO W KYV40" are not large at all. Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB". The "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" than the "DIGNO W KYV40".

Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB

DIGNO W KYV40

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet79/10074/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games53/10037/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" and "DIGNO W KYV40"

Battery performance of Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB

The "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 5000.0mAh.

Battery performance of DIGNO W KYV40

The "DIGNO W KYV40" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 2000mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For looking things up online, checking SNS, playing games occasionally or for most frequent use, it doesn't feel like there is much difference between the "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" and the "DIGNO W KYV40". Both the "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" and the "DIGNO W KYV40" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" and the "DIGNO W KYV40" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB

DIGNO W KYV40

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/10096/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos100/10089/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" and "DIGNO W KYV40"

The storage capacity of the Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB

The "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the DIGNO W KYV40

The "DIGNO W KYV40" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 200.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 16GB. "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "DIGNO W KYV40" unfortunately falls behind here.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 56GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. "DIGNO W KYV40" is recommended over "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" if you save a lot of movies to watch on your phone, or if you save a lot of photos. Both the "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" and the "DIGNO W KYV40" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB

DIGNO W KYV40

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games78/10070/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos78/10085/100

Which to buy, the "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" or "DIGNO W KYV40"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" or "DIGNO W KYV40"?

If you want a larger screen, "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" is recommended as it has a 5.5inch screen. The "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. When comparing "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" and "DIGNO W KYV40" overall, "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.

Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB

DIGNO W KYV40

Handling-59/100
Display61/10056/100
CPU specs66/10054/100
General rating73/10064/100

Is it recommended to buy the Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the DIGNO W KYV40, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "DIGNO W KYV40" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "DIGNO W KYV40" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" and "DIGNO W KYV40" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Sharp R1S (2018) 32GB" and "DIGNO W KYV40". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Sharp R1S (2018) 32GBDIGNO W KYV40
Sharp R1S (2018) 32GBDIGNO W KYV40
ColorBlackBlue/White/Pink
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)71.0mm x 142.0mm x 10.4mm
Weight159.0g
Display size5.5inch5.0inch
Display typeIPS LCDTFT
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1280720 x 1280
Pixel density267ppi293ppi
Battery capacity5000.0mAh3000.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6750Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937
CPU specs1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.4GHz+1.1GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size3.0GB2.0GB
Storage size32.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles