Vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB vs HTC U Play (2017) 64GB: Specs & Scores
Created date: 2018-11-18 12:35:24, Updated date: 2020-04-15 21:21:54
How are the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" and "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" and the "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" and "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" and "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" and "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" and "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" and "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" and "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" or "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" and "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" ?
What is the difference between the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" and the "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" and "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"
The design of vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB
The "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" is 155.1mm long, 75.1mm wide, and 8.3mm thick. It weighs 163.5g.
The design of HTC U Play (2017) 64GB
The "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" is 146.0mm long, 72.9mm wide, and 8.0mm thick. It weighs 145.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 9mm in length, 2.1mm in width, and 0.3mm in thickness. Both the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" and "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" and "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB". Both the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" and "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 18.5g. The "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB | HTC U Play (2017) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 64/100 | 68/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 43/100 | 57/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 59/100 | 62/100 |
Compare the display of the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" and "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"
Display of the vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB
The "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1520, and the pixel density is 271ppi. The "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" has a 6.2inch screen size.
Display of the HTC U Play (2017) 64GB
The "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" uses a Super LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 423ppi. The "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" has a 5.2inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. Both the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" and the "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" offers a more suitable screen size. Both the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" and the "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB". The "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB | HTC U Play (2017) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 77/100 | 70/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 81/100 | 70/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" and "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"
Camera performance of vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB
The main camera of the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Camera performance of HTC U Play (2017) 64GB
The main camera of the "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" has 16.0MP. The front camera has 16.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 3MP difference in comparison. As for taking photos of scenic places or group photos of people, the rear camera of "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" is more suited for capturing distant objects. The "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" and the "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 8MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB | HTC U Play (2017) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 80/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 80/100 | 100/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" and "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"
The processing capability of the vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" uses the Qualcomm SDM439 Snapdragon 439 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.95GHz+1.45GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.
The processing capability of the HTC U Play (2017) 64GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" uses the Mediatek MT6755 Helio P10 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.0GHz+1.1GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
The CPU specs are the same for both phones. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.
For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" and the "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" are not large at all. For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" and the "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" equally. Both the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" and the "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is basically no difference between "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" and "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. Functionality is about the same for full-scale 3D games, no matter which phone model is used. Both the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" and the "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB | HTC U Play (2017) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 87/100 | 86/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 81/100 | 79/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" and "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"
Battery performance of vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB
The "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" has a battery capacity of 4030.0mAh.
Battery performance of HTC U Play (2017) 64GB
The "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1530mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" over the "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB". Both the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" and the "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB | HTC U Play (2017) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 83/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 68/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" and "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"
The storage capacity of the vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB
The "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the HTC U Play (2017) 64GB
The "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
If you are only downloading a few games and apps (such as SNS) to use on your phone, it really doesn't matter if you choose "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" or "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB". If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy. Both the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" and the "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" or "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB". Both the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" and the "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB | HTC U Play (2017) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 84/100 | 84/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 91/100 | 91/100 |
Which to buy, the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" or "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" or "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"?
"HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. If you want a larger screen, "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" is recommended as it has a 5.2inch screen. There isn't much difference between "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" and "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" in terms of performance or specifications. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.
vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB | HTC U Play (2017) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 57/100 | 63/100 |
Display | 66/100 | 74/100 |
CPU specs | 84/100 | 82/100 |
General rating | 76/100 | 78/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the HTC U Play (2017) 64GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" and "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" and "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB | HTC U Play (2017) 64GB | |
Color | Starry Black/Sunset Red | Brilliant Black/Cosmetic Pink/Ice White/Sapphire Blue |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 75.1mm x 155.1mm x 8.3mm | 72.9mm x 146.0mm x 8.0mm |
Weight | 163.5g | 145.0g |
Display size | 6.2inch | 5.2inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | Super LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1520 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 271ppi | 423ppi |
Battery capacity | 4030.0mAh | 2500.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SDM439 Snapdragon 439 | Mediatek MT6755 Helio P10 |
CPU specs | 1.95GHz+1.45GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 2.0GHz+1.1GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 4.0GB | 4.0GB |
Storage size | 64.0GB | 64.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 16.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 16.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |