Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB vs. BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB Specs & Scores
Created date: 2018-11-18 12:06:00, Updated date: 2021-10-20 18:23:50
Which do we recommend after comparing the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" and "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" and "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB".
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" and the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" and "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" and "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" and "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" and "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" and "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" and "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" or "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" and "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" and the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" and "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB"
The design of Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB
The "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" is 154.9mm long, 74.8mm wide, and 7.6mm thick. It weighs 175.0g.
The design of BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB
The "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" is 151.9mm long, 74.6mm wide, and 6.9mm thick. It weighs 142.6g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 3mm in length, 0.2mm in width, and 0.6mm in thickness. Both the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" and "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" and "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB". Both the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" and "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 32.4g. The "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB | BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 66/100 | 67/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 36/100 | 59/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 60/100 | 61/100 |
Compare the display of the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" and "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB"
Display of the Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB
The "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2248, and the pixel density is 401ppi. The "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" has a 6.21inch screen size.
Display of the BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB
The "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" uses a AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.71inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. Both the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" and the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. If you compare how well the different phones support mobile games, the display size of "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" makes it more suited for playing games. Both the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" and the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB". The "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB | BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 77/100 | 72/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 81/100 | 73/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" and "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB"
Camera performance of Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB
The main camera of the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" has 12.0MP. The front camera has 20.0MP.
Camera performance of BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB
The main camera of the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 1MP difference in comparison. There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" and "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" and the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 15MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB | BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 70/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 100/100 | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" and "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB"
The processing capability of the Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" uses the Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.8GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 8.0GB.
The processing capability of the BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" uses the Mediatek MT6753 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB", the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 5GB difference in memory capacity. The "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" has more memory storage, making the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" is the better choice to buy over the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB". Both the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" and the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" than the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB". The "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB | BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 100/100 | 82/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 97/100 | 66/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" and "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB"
Battery performance of Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB
The "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" has a battery capacity of 3400.0mAh.
Battery performance of BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB
The "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3150.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 250mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For looking things up online, checking SNS, playing games occasionally or for most frequent use, it doesn't feel like there is much difference between the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" and the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB". Both the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" and the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" and the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB | BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 94/100 | 90/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 86/100 | 78/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" and "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB"
The storage capacity of the Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB
The "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" has 256.0GB of internal memory.
The storage capacity of the BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB
The "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 224GB. The "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.
Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB | BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 90/100 | 78/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | - | 70/100 |
Which to buy, the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" or "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" or "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB"?
"BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 6.21inch makes the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" a lot easier to use. The "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" and the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB", the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" is overall the clear winner.
Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB | BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 56/100 | 63/100 |
Display | 79/100 | 61/100 |
CPU specs | 98/100 | 73/100 |
General rating | 81/100 | 69/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" is a high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" and "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB" and "BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Xiaomi Mi 8 (2018) 256GB | BLU Vivo 5 (2016) 32GB | |
Color | Black/Blue/White/Gold | Silver/Gold |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 74.8mm x 154.9mm x 7.6mm | 74.6mm x 151.9mm x 6.9mm |
Weight | 175.0g | 142.6g |
Display size | 6.21inch | 5.5inch |
Display type | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2248 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 401ppi | 267ppi |
Battery capacity | 3400.0mAh | 3150.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 | Mediatek MT6753 |
CPU specs | 2.8GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 8.0GB | 3.0GB |
Storage size | 256.0GB | 32.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 12.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 20.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |