ZTE Tempo Go 8GB vs Lava Iris Atom 8GB: Which is the best?
Created date: 2018-11-18 11:30:04, Updated date: 2020-04-16 20:55:52
How are the "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" and "Lava Iris Atom 8GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
ZTE Tempo Go 8GB | Lava Iris Atom 8GB | |||
General rating: | 31.8/100 (The 3993th of all smartphones) | 36.1/100 (The 2816th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | - /100 | 77/100 | ||
Screen quality | 48/100 | 34/100 | ||
Performance | 26/100 | 24/100 | ||
Storage size | 35/100 | 35/100 | ||
Battery | 82/100 | 67/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 35/100 | 35/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 50/100 | - /100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" and the "Lava Iris Atom 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" and "Lava Iris Atom 8GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" and "Lava Iris Atom 8GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" and "Lava Iris Atom 8GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" and "Lava Iris Atom 8GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" and "Lava Iris Atom 8GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" and "Lava Iris Atom 8GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" or "Lava Iris Atom 8GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" and "Lava Iris Atom 8GB" ?
What is the difference between the "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" and the "Lava Iris Atom 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" and "Lava Iris Atom 8GB"
The design of ZTE Tempo Go 8GB
The "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" is 145.5mm long, 71.9mm wide, and 9.1mm thick.
The design of Lava Iris Atom 8GB
The "Lava Iris Atom 8GB" is 125.5mm long, 63.2mm wide, and 9.7mm thick. It weighs 110.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 20mm in length, 8.7mm in width, and 0.5mm in thickness. "Lava Iris Atom 8GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. Flick typing is easier on the "Lava Iris Atom 8GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "Lava Iris Atom 8GB" is more compact than "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.
ZTE Tempo Go 8GB | Lava Iris Atom 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 68/100 | 78/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | - | 86/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 62/100 | 70/100 |
Compare the display of the "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" and "Lava Iris Atom 8GB"
Display of the ZTE Tempo Go 8GB
The "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 854, and the pixel density is 195ppi. The "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Display of the Lava Iris Atom 8GB
The "Lava Iris Atom 8GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 800, and the pixel density is 233ppi. The "Lava Iris Atom 8GB" has a 4.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. In the gaming end, the "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Lava Iris Atom 8GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "Lava Iris Atom 8GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" nor the "Lava Iris Atom 8GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
ZTE Tempo Go 8GB | Lava Iris Atom 8GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 68/100 | 46/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 60/100 | 25/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" and "Lava Iris Atom 8GB"
Camera performance of ZTE Tempo Go 8GB
The main camera of the "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" has 5.0MP. The front camera has 2.0MP.
Camera performance of Lava Iris Atom 8GB
The main camera of the "Lava Iris Atom 8GB" has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" and "Lava Iris Atom 8GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones.
ZTE Tempo Go 8GB | Lava Iris Atom 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 35/100 | 35/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 50/100 | - |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" and "Lava Iris Atom 8GB"
The processing capability of the ZTE Tempo Go 8GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8909 Snapdragon 210 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.1GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.
The processing capability of the Lava Iris Atom 8GB
The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.
Which has the better processing capability?
The CPU specs are the same for both phones. This is a 511GB difference in memory capacity. The "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" has more memory storage, making the "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For using fundamental features such as calls, emails, messages and using SNS, I am more inclined to recommend the "Lava Iris Atom 8GB". For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" and the "Lava Iris Atom 8GB" equally.
There is basically no difference between "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" and "Lava Iris Atom 8GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. Functionality is about the same for full-scale 3D games, no matter which phone model is used. Neither the "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" nor the "Lava Iris Atom 8GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
ZTE Tempo Go 8GB | Lava Iris Atom 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 41/100 | 47/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 11/100 | 7/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" and "Lava Iris Atom 8GB"
Battery performance of ZTE Tempo Go 8GB
The "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" has a battery capacity of 2200.0mAh.
Battery performance of Lava Iris Atom 8GB
The "Lava Iris Atom 8GB" has a battery capacity of 1550.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 650mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" over the "Lava Iris Atom 8GB". The "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use.
ZTE Tempo Go 8GB | Lava Iris Atom 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 82/100 | 67/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 65/100 | 43/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" and "Lava Iris Atom 8GB"
The storage capacity of the ZTE Tempo Go 8GB
The "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Lava Iris Atom 8GB
The "Lava Iris Atom 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
If you are only downloading a few games and apps (such as SNS) to use on your phone, it really doesn't matter if you choose "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" or "Lava Iris Atom 8GB". If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy. Neither the "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" nor the "Lava Iris Atom 8GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" or "Lava Iris Atom 8GB".
ZTE Tempo Go 8GB | Lava Iris Atom 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 35/100 | 35/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 56/100 | 56/100 |
Which to buy, the "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" or "Lava Iris Atom 8GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" or "Lava Iris Atom 8GB"?
Its perfect screen size of 5.0inch makes the "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" a lot easier to use. There isn't much difference between "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" and "Lava Iris Atom 8GB" in terms of performance or specifications. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.
ZTE Tempo Go 8GB | Lava Iris Atom 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | - | 77/100 |
Display | 48/100 | 34/100 |
CPU specs | 26/100 | 24/100 |
General rating | 44/100 | 44/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Tempo Go 8GB, compared with other smartphones?
The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Is it recommended to buy the Lava Iris Atom 8GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Lava Iris Atom 8GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Lava Iris Atom 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" and "Lava Iris Atom 8GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "ZTE Tempo Go 8GB" and "Lava Iris Atom 8GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
ZTE Tempo Go 8GB | Lava Iris Atom 8GB | |
Color | Gray | Black/White |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 71.9mm x 145.5mm x 9.1mm | 63.2mm x 125.5mm x 9.7mm |
Weight | 110.0g | |
Display size | 5.0inch | 4.0inch |
Display type | TFT | TFT |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 480 x 854 | 480 x 800 |
Pixel density | 195ppi | 233ppi |
Battery capacity | 2200.0mAh | 1550.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8909 Snapdragon 210 | |
CPU specs | 1.1GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 1.0GB | 512.0MB |
Storage size | 8.0GB | 8.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 5.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 2.0MP | |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |