Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB vs Plum Trigger Plus 2GB: Which is the best?

Created date: 2018-11-18 11:22:17, Updated date: 2021-10-20 21:11:15

Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GBPlum Trigger Plus 2GB
Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GBPlum Trigger Plus 2GB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and "Plum Trigger Plus 2GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and "Plum Trigger Plus 2GB".

Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GBPlum Trigger Plus 2GB
Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB

Plum Trigger Plus 2GB

General rating:
Griprating-image1.4
97.0mm x 186.0mm x 8.9mm
rating-image3.7
62.4mm x 118.0mm x 11.5mm
Screen qualityrating-image3.3
IPS LCD, 6.98inch, 720 x 1280
rating-image1
TFT, 3.5inch, 320 x 480
Performancerating-image1.4
Qualcomm MSM8916 Snapdragon 410, 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores), 1.0GB
rating-image1
Mediatek MT6572, 1.3GHz×2(2.0-cores), 256.0MB
Storage sizerating-image3.5
16.0GB
rating-image1
2.0GB
Batteryrating-image4.5
4250.0mAh
rating-image2.5
1100.0mAh
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image3.6
13.0MP
rating-image1.8
5.0MP
Front-camera resolutionrating-image3.3
5.0MP
rating-image2.8
3.0MP

What is the difference between the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and the "Plum Trigger Plus 2GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and "Plum Trigger Plus 2GB"

The design of Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB

The "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" is 186.0mm long, 97.0mm wide, and 8.9mm thick. It weighs 250.0g.

The design of Plum Trigger Plus 2GB

The "Plum Trigger Plus 2GB" is 118.0mm long, 62.4mm wide, and 11.5mm thick. It weighs 120.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 68mm in length, 34.6mm in width, and 2.5mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Plum Trigger Plus 2GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Plum Trigger Plus 2GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. The "Plum Trigger Plus 2GB" is also much easier to carry around, and scores more points than the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" for portability.

The difference in weight is 130g. The "Plum Trigger Plus 2GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB

Plum Trigger Plus 2GB

Ease of holding it in one hand33/10077/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand0/10078/100
Ease of carrying around41/10068/100

Compare the display of the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and "Plum Trigger Plus 2GB"

Display of the Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB

The "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 210ppi. The "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" has a 6.98inch screen size.

Display of the Plum Trigger Plus 2GB

The "Plum Trigger Plus 2GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 320 x 480, and the pixel density is 164ppi. The "Plum Trigger Plus 2GB" has a 3.5inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 3.48inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Plum Trigger Plus 2GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance. In the gaming end, the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Plum Trigger Plus 2GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

In terms of display, the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" nor the "Plum Trigger Plus 2GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB

Plum Trigger Plus 2GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?83/10025/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?89/10015/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and "Plum Trigger Plus 2GB"

Camera performance of Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB

The main camera of the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Camera performance of Plum Trigger Plus 2GB

The main camera of the "Plum Trigger Plus 2GB" has 5.0MP. The front camera has 3.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 8MP difference in comparison. The "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

There is a 2MP difference in front camera pixel number. When taking photos of distant objects, including photos taken using a selfie stick or photos that require clear backgrounds, the camera of "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" has better performance. The "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB

Plum Trigger Plus 2GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?72/10035/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?65/10055/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and "Plum Trigger Plus 2GB"

The processing capability of the Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8916 Snapdragon 410 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.

The processing capability of the Plum Trigger Plus 2GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Plum Trigger Plus 2GB" uses the Mediatek MT6572 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 256.0MB.

Which has the better processing capability?

"Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" has a slightly better CPU performance and better specs overall. This is a 255GB difference in memory capacity. The "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" has more memory storage, making the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Plum Trigger Plus 2GB". For people who mostly use their phone to look up things on the internet, watch videos, or occasionally play mini games, the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" edges out the competition. The "Plum Trigger Plus 2GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

There is basically no difference between "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and "Plum Trigger Plus 2GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. For playing more memory-intensive 3D games, it is better to go with "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" as it has better performance. Neither the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" nor the "Plum Trigger Plus 2GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB

Plum Trigger Plus 2GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet44/10028/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games11/1004/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and "Plum Trigger Plus 2GB"

Battery performance of Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB

The "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 4250.0mAh.

Battery performance of Plum Trigger Plus 2GB

The "Plum Trigger Plus 2GB" has a battery capacity of 1100.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 3150mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" over the "Plum Trigger Plus 2GB". The "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Plum Trigger Plus 2GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB

Plum Trigger Plus 2GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet89/10050/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos78/10028/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and "Plum Trigger Plus 2GB"

The storage capacity of the Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB

The "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the Plum Trigger Plus 2GB

The "Plum Trigger Plus 2GB" has 2.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 14GB. The "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Plum Trigger Plus 2GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Plum Trigger Plus 2GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 46GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content.

Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB

Plum Trigger Plus 2GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games70/1008/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos67/10054/100

Which to buy, the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" or "Plum Trigger Plus 2GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" or "Plum Trigger Plus 2GB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Plum Trigger Plus 2GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 6.98inch makes the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" a lot easier to use. The "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and the "Plum Trigger Plus 2GB", the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" is overall the clear winner.

Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB

Plum Trigger Plus 2GB

Handling27/10074/100
Display65/10018/100
CPU specs27/10016/100
General rating55/10035/100

Is it recommended to buy the Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

The "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" is difficult to hold and use compared to other smartphones. People with large hands can probably manage to operate it with one hand, but a smaller, more compact phone would be preferable for most people. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

Is it recommended to buy the Plum Trigger Plus 2GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Plum Trigger Plus 2GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is smaller than that of standard smartphones. The font size on the screen is also rather small, so it is not suited for reading articles or long texts on the internet. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "Plum Trigger Plus 2GB" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and "Plum Trigger Plus 2GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GB" and "Plum Trigger Plus 2GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GBPlum Trigger Plus 2GB
Lenovo Phab (2015) 16GBPlum Trigger Plus 2GB
ColorTuxedo Black/Polar White/Aqua Blue/Cherry RedBlack/White/Blue/Red/Pink
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)97.0mm x 186.0mm x 8.9mm62.4mm x 118.0mm x 11.5mm
Weight250.0g120.0g
Display size6.98inch3.5inch
Display typeIPS LCDTFT
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1280320 x 480
Pixel density210ppi164ppi
Battery capacity4250.0mAh1100.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm MSM8916 Snapdragon 410Mediatek MT6572
CPU specs1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.3GHz×2(2.0-cores)
RAM size1.0GB256.0MB
Storage size16.0GB2.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP5.0MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP3.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles