Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB vs Yezz Andy 4E3I
Created date: 2018-11-18 12:36:51, Updated date: 2020-04-16 14:45:06
How are the "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" and "Yezz Andy 4E3I" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" and the "Yezz Andy 4E3I"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" and "Yezz Andy 4E3I"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" and "Yezz Andy 4E3I"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" and "Yezz Andy 4E3I"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" and "Yezz Andy 4E3I"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" and "Yezz Andy 4E3I"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" and "Yezz Andy 4E3I"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" or "Yezz Andy 4E3I"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" and "Yezz Andy 4E3I" ?
What is the difference between the "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" and the "Yezz Andy 4E3I"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" and "Yezz Andy 4E3I"
The design of Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB
The design of Yezz Andy 4E3I
The "Yezz Andy 4E3I" is 121.0mm long, 64.6mm wide, and 10.7mm thick. It weighs 116.9g.
Which is the better design to use?
Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB | Yezz Andy 4E3I | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | - | 75/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | - | 80/100 |
Ease of carrying around | - | 67/100 |
Compare the display of the "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" and "Yezz Andy 4E3I"
Display of the Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB
The "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Display of the Yezz Andy 4E3I
The "Yezz Andy 4E3I" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 800, and the pixel density is 233ppi. The "Yezz Andy 4E3I" has a 4.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Yezz Andy 4E3I" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
In terms of display, the "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" nor the "Yezz Andy 4E3I" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB | Yezz Andy 4E3I | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 72/100 | 46/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 73/100 | 25/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" and "Yezz Andy 4E3I"
Camera performance of Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB
The main camera of the "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Camera performance of Yezz Andy 4E3I
The main camera of the "Yezz Andy 4E3I" has 5.0MP. The front camera has 1.3MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 3MP difference in comparison. The "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts.
There is a 3.7MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB | Yezz Andy 4E3I | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 50/100 | 35/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 65/100 | 46/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" and "Yezz Andy 4E3I"
The processing capability of the Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6580 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.
The processing capability of the Yezz Andy 4E3I
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Yezz Andy 4E3I" uses the Mediatek MT6572A SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Yezz Andy 4E3I", the "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 511GB difference in memory capacity. The "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" has more memory storage, making the "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Yezz Andy 4E3I". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB". The "Yezz Andy 4E3I" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
There is basically no difference between "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" and "Yezz Andy 4E3I" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. For playing more memory-intensive 3D games, it is better to go with "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" as it has better performance. Neither the "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" nor the "Yezz Andy 4E3I" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB | Yezz Andy 4E3I | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 47/100 | 28/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 12/100 | 4/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" and "Yezz Andy 4E3I"
Battery performance of Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB
The "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.
Battery performance of Yezz Andy 4E3I
The "Yezz Andy 4E3I" has a battery capacity of 1400.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1100mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" over the "Yezz Andy 4E3I". The "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use.
Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB | Yezz Andy 4E3I | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 78/100 | 64/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 58/100 | 40/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" and "Yezz Andy 4E3I"
The storage capacity of the Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB
The "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Yezz Andy 4E3I
The "Yezz Andy 4E3I" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 12GB. The "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Yezz Andy 4E3I" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Yezz Andy 4E3I" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 20GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. "Yezz Andy 4E3I" is recommended over "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" if you save a lot of movies to watch on your phone, or if you save a lot of photos.
Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB | Yezz Andy 4E3I | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 70/100 | 17/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 59/100 | 65/100 |
Which to buy, the "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" or "Yezz Andy 4E3I"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" or "Yezz Andy 4E3I"?
Its perfect screen size of 5.5inch makes the "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" a lot easier to use. The "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" and the "Yezz Andy 4E3I", the "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" is overall the clear winner.
Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB | Yezz Andy 4E3I | |
---|---|---|
Handling | - | 74/100 |
Display | 61/100 | 34/100 |
CPU specs | 28/100 | 17/100 |
General rating | 53/100 | 41/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the Yezz Andy 4E3I, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Yezz Andy 4E3I" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. Judging from the overall specs, the "Yezz Andy 4E3I" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" and "Yezz Andy 4E3I" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB" and "Yezz Andy 4E3I". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Micromax Canvas Fire 5 Q386 16GB | Yezz Andy 4E3I | |
Color | Gold/grey/silver | black |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 64.6mm x 121.0mm x 10.7mm | |
Weight | 116.9g | |
Display size | 5.5inch | 4.0inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | TFT |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | 480 x 800 |
Pixel density | 267ppi | 233ppi |
Battery capacity | 2500.0mAh | 1400.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6580 | Mediatek MT6572A |
CPU specs | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×2(2.0-cores) |
RAM size | 1.0GB | 512.0MB |
Storage size | 16.0GB | 4.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 5.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 1.3MP |