Which one is better, the vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB or TECNO Camon X 32GB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!
Created date: 2018-12-10 17:32:30, Updated date: 2020-04-16 14:30:41
How are the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" and "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
TECNO Camon X 32GB | vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB | |||
General rating: | 63.6/100 (The 3615th of all smartphones) | 67.4/100 (The 1106th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 62/100 | 57/100 | ||
Screen quality | 64/100 | 64/100 | ||
Performance | 85/100 | 90/100 | ||
Storage size | 78/100 | 84/100 | ||
Battery | 100/100 | 90/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 80/100 | 80/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 100/100 | 100/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" and the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" and "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" and "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" and "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" and "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" and "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" and "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" or "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" and "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" ?
What is the difference between the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" and the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" and "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB"
The design of TECNO Camon X 32GB
The "TECNO Camon X 32GB" is 158.6mm long, 75.8mm wide, and 5.2mm thick. It weighs 149.0g.
The design of vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB
The "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" is 155.9mm long, 75.8mm wide, and 7.7mm thick. It weighs 160.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
"TECNO Camon X 32GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "TECNO Camon X 32GB" and "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB". Both the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" and "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 11g. "TECNO Camon X 32GB" weighs less than "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" and is easier to handle.
TECNO Camon X 32GB | vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 68/100 | 63/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 54/100 | 46/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 62/100 | 59/100 |
Compare the display of the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" and "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB"
Display of the TECNO Camon X 32GB
The "TECNO Camon X 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1440, and the pixel density is 268ppi. The "TECNO Camon X 32GB" has a 6.0inch screen size.
Display of the vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB
The "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1440, and the pixel density is 268ppi. The "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" has a 5.99inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
When actually viewing the two phones' onscreen displays, it is obvious that they are roughly the same size. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" and the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size. Both the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" and the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "TECNO Camon X 32GB" and "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" nor the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
TECNO Camon X 32GB | vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 76/100 | 76/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 78/100 | 78/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" and "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB"
Camera performance of TECNO Camon X 32GB
The main camera of the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" has 16.0MP. The front camera has 20.0MP.
Camera performance of vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB
The main camera of the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" has 16.0MP. The front camera has 24.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "TECNO Camon X 32GB" and "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" and the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 4MP difference in front camera pixel number. When shooting objects or people with the front phone camera from a short distance, such as taking a selfie with a selfie-stick, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones, even when it comes to the scenery in the background of such photographs. Both the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" and the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "TECNO Camon X 32GB" and "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.
TECNO Camon X 32GB | vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 80/100 | 80/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 100/100 | 100/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" and "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB"
The processing capability of the TECNO Camon X 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" uses the Mediatek MT6763T Helio P23 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
The processing capability of the vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" uses the Qualcomm SDM450 Snapdragon 450 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
The CPU specs are the same for both phones. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" has more memory storage, making the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" and the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" are not large at all. For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" and the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" equally. Both the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" and the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is basically no difference between "TECNO Camon X 32GB" and "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" than the "TECNO Camon X 32GB". Both the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" and the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
TECNO Camon X 32GB | vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 92/100 | 93/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 76/100 | 88/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" and "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB"
Battery performance of TECNO Camon X 32GB
The "TECNO Camon X 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3750.0mAh.
Battery performance of vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB
The "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" has a battery capacity of 3225.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 525mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you use the phone infrequently for just making calls or checking the time, I think the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" is a bit better. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" over the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB". Both the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" and the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" and the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
TECNO Camon X 32GB | vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 90/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 78/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" and "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB"
The storage capacity of the TECNO Camon X 32GB
The "TECNO Camon X 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB
The "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 32GB. "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 160GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. Both the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" and the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
TECNO Camon X 32GB | vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 78/100 | 84/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 78/100 | 91/100 |
Which to buy, the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" or "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" or "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB"?
When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "TECNO Camon X 32GB" and "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB". If choosing based on screen size, there is hardly any difference between "TECNO Camon X 32GB" and "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB". "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" is better for users who prefer better functionality and specs. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.
TECNO Camon X 32GB | vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 62/100 | 57/100 |
Display | 64/100 | 64/100 |
CPU specs | 85/100 | 90/100 |
General rating | 78/100 | 78/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the TECNO Camon X 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" and "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "TECNO Camon X 32GB" and "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
TECNO Camon X 32GB | vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB | |
Color | Champagne Gold/Midnight Black/City Blue | Champagne Gold/Matte Black/Infinite Red |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 75.8mm x 158.6mm x 5.2mm | 75.8mm x 155.9mm x 7.7mm |
Weight | 149.0g | 160.0g |
Display size | 6.0inch | 5.99inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1440 | 720 x 1440 |
Pixel density | 268ppi | 268ppi |
Battery capacity | 3750.0mAh | 3225.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6763T Helio P23 | Qualcomm SDM450 Snapdragon 450 |
CPU specs | 2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 3.0GB | 4.0GB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 64.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 16.0MP | 16.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 20.0MP | 24.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |