Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Which one is better, the AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB or vivo Y93s (2018)? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!

Created date: 2018-12-10 17:56:37, Updated date: 2020-04-04 20:18:50

vivo Y93s (2018)AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB
vivo Y93s (2018)AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB

How are the "vivo Y93s (2018)" and "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

vivo Y93s (2018)AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB
vivo Y93s (2018)AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB

General rating:

70.6/100

(The 3436th of all smartphones)

59.3/100

(The 337th of all smartphones)

Grip
56/100
66/100
Screen quality
66/100
70/100
Performance
93/100
56/100
Storage size
90/100
78/100
Battery
100/100
81/100
Rear-camera resolution
72/100
80/100
Front-camera resolution
80/100
50/100

What is the difference between the "vivo Y93s (2018)" and the "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo Y93s (2018)" and "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB"

The design of vivo Y93s (2018)

The "vivo Y93s (2018)" is 155.1mm long, 75.1mm wide, and 8.3mm thick. It weighs 165.0g.

The design of AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB

The "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB" is 141.0mm long, 70.0mm wide, and 9.2mm thick. It weighs 139.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 14mm in length, 5mm in width, and 0.8mm in thickness. "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB" is bigger than "vivo Y93s (2018)", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "vivo Y93s (2018)" and "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 26g. The "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

vivo Y93s (2018)

AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB

Ease of holding it in one hand64/10070/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand42/10062/100
Ease of carrying around59/10063/100

Compare the display of the "vivo Y93s (2018)" and "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB"

Display of the vivo Y93s (2018)

The "vivo Y93s (2018)" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1520, and the pixel density is 271ppi. The "vivo Y93s (2018)" has a 6.2inch screen size.

Display of the AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB

The "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB" uses a IGZO liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 440ppi. The "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 1.2inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "vivo Y93s (2018)" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. The "vivo Y93s (2018)" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "vivo Y93s (2018)" offers a more suitable screen size. The "vivo Y93s (2018)" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "vivo Y93s (2018)". The "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "vivo Y93s (2018)" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

vivo Y93s (2018)

AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?77/10068/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?81/10060/100

Compare the camera performances of the "vivo Y93s (2018)" and "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB"

Camera performance of vivo Y93s (2018)

The main camera of the "vivo Y93s (2018)" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Camera performance of AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB

The main camera of the "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB" has 16.3MP. The front camera has 2.1MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 3.3MP difference in comparison. As for taking photos of scenic places or group photos of people, the rear camera of "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB" is more suited for capturing distant objects. The "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "vivo Y93s (2018)" and the "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is a 5.9MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "vivo Y93s (2018)"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "vivo Y93s (2018)"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

vivo Y93s (2018)

AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?72/10080/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?80/10050/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo Y93s (2018)" and "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB"

The processing capability of the vivo Y93s (2018)

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo Y93s (2018)" uses the Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.

The processing capability of the AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB" uses the Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB", the "vivo Y93s (2018)" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 2GB difference in memory capacity. The "vivo Y93s (2018)" has more memory storage, making the "vivo Y93s (2018)" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "vivo Y93s (2018)" is the better choice to buy over the "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "vivo Y93s (2018)". The "vivo Y93s (2018)" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The "vivo Y93s (2018)" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "vivo Y93s (2018)" than the "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB". The "vivo Y93s (2018)" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

vivo Y93s (2018)

AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet96/10076/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games90/10039/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo Y93s (2018)" and "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB"

Battery performance of vivo Y93s (2018)

The "vivo Y93s (2018)" has a battery capacity of 4030.0mAh.

Battery performance of AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB

The "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1030mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "vivo Y93s (2018)" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "vivo Y93s (2018)" over the "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB". Both the "vivo Y93s (2018)" and the "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "vivo Y93s (2018)" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "vivo Y93s (2018)" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

vivo Y93s (2018)

AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/10081/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos100/10064/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo Y93s (2018)" and "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB"

The storage capacity of the vivo Y93s (2018)

The "vivo Y93s (2018)" has 128.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB

The "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 96GB. The "vivo Y93s (2018)" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "vivo Y93s (2018)" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "vivo Y93s (2018)" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 288GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "vivo Y93s (2018)" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. Both the "vivo Y93s (2018)" and the "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

vivo Y93s (2018)

AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games90/10078/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos92/10070/100

Which to buy, the "vivo Y93s (2018)" or "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "vivo Y93s (2018)" or "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB"?

"AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. If choosing based on screen size, there is hardly any difference between "vivo Y93s (2018)" and "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB". The "vivo Y93s (2018)" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "vivo Y93s (2018)" and the "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB", the "vivo Y93s (2018)" is overall the clear winner.

vivo Y93s (2018)

AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB

Handling56/10066/100
Display66/10070/100
CPU specs93/10056/100
General rating79/10067/100

Is it recommended to buy the vivo Y93s (2018), compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "vivo Y93s (2018)" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo Y93s (2018)" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "vivo Y93s (2018)" and "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "vivo Y93s (2018)" and "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

vivo Y93s (2018)AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB
vivo Y93s (2018)AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-01F docomo 32GB
Colorzixia red,aurora red,blueNavy/White/Red
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)75.1mm x 155.1mm x 8.3mm70.0mm x 141.0mm x 9.2mm
Weight165.0g139.0g
Display size6.2inch5.0inch
Display typeIPS LCDIGZO
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 15201080 x 1920
Pixel density271ppi440ppi
Battery capacity4030.0mAh3000.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6762 Helio P22Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
CPU specs2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)2.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size4.0GB2.0GB
Storage size128.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP16.3MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP2.1MP

Check price

New articles