Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB vs Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB

Created date: 2018-12-13 08:56:33, Updated date: 2020-04-16 18:47:44

OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GBGeanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB
OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GBGeanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB

How are the "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" and "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GBGeanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB
OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB

Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB

General rating:
Griprating-image2.7
53/100
rating-image3.5
70/100
Screen qualityrating-image4.0
80/100
rating-image1
18/100
Performancerating-image5.0
99/100
rating-image1
15/100
Storage sizerating-image4.5
90/100
rating-image1
17/100
Batteryrating-image4.9
97/100
rating-image3.3
65/100
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image4.5
90/100
rating-image1.0
20/100
Front-camera resolutionrating-image5.0
100/100
rating-image2.1
41/100

What is the difference between the "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" and the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" and "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB"

The design of OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB

The "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" is 157.5mm long, 74.8mm wide, and 8.2mm thick. It weighs 185.0g.

The design of Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB

The "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" is 113.0mm long, 62.0mm wide, and 12.0mm thick. It weighs 140.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 44.5mm in length, 12.7mm in width, and 3.8mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" is more compact than "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.

The difference in weight is 45g. The "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB

Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB

Ease of holding it in one hand64/10077/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand29/10061/100
Ease of carrying around60/10068/100

Compare the display of the "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" and "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB"

Display of the OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB

The "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" uses a Optic AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2340, and the pixel density is 402ppi. The "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" has a 6.41inch screen size.

Display of the Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB

The "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 320 x 480, and the pixel density is 164ppi. The "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" has a 3.5inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 2.91inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance. In the gaming end, the "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

In terms of display, the "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB". The "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB

Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?79/10025/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?83/10015/100

Compare the camera performances of the "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" and "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB"

Camera performance of OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB

The main camera of the "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" has 20.0MP. The front camera has 16.0MP.

Camera performance of Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB

The main camera of the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" has 2.0MP. The front camera has 0.3MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 18MP difference in comparison. The "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

There is a 15.7MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB

Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?90/10020/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?100/10041/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" and "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB"

The processing capability of the OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" uses the Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.8GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 10.0GB.

The processing capability of the Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" uses the MediaTek MT6572M SoC. The CPU performance is 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB", the "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 502GB difference in memory capacity. The "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" has more memory storage, making the "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB". The "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

The "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" than the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB". The "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB

Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet100/10024/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games98/1004/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" and "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB"

Battery performance of OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB

The "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" has a battery capacity of 3700.0mAh.

Battery performance of Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB

The "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" has a battery capacity of 1420.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 2280mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" over the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB". The "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB

Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet97/10065/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos91/10041/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" and "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB"

The storage capacity of the OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB

The "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" has 256.0GB of internal memory.

The storage capacity of the Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB

The "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 252GB. The "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.

OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB

Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games90/10017/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos - 55/100

Which to buy, the "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" or "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" or "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 6.41inch makes the "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" a lot easier to use. The "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" and the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB", the "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" is overall the clear winner.

OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB

Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB

Handling53/10070/100
Display80/10018/100
CPU specs99/10015/100
General rating83/10035/100

Is it recommended to buy the OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" is a high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is smaller than that of standard smartphones. The font size on the screen is also rather small, so it is not suited for reading articles or long texts on the internet. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" and "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GB" and "Geanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GBGeanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB
OnePlus 6T McLaren 256GBGeanee FXC-35 (2014) 4GB
ColorSpeed Orange
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)74.8mm x 157.5mm x 8.2mm62.0mm x 113.0mm x 12.0mm
Weight185.0g140.0g
Display size6.41inch3.5inch
Display typeOptic AMOLEDTFT
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 2340320 x 480
Pixel density402ppi164ppi
Battery capacity3700.0mAh1420.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845MediaTek MT6572M
CPU specs2.8GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores)
RAM size10.0GB512.0MB
Storage size256.0GB4.0GB
Rear-camera resolution20.0MP2.0MP
Front-camera resolution16.0MP0.3MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles