Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB vs Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB: Full Comparison!

Created date: 2018-12-15 23:25:19, Updated date: 2021-10-20 20:10:38

Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GBCelkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB
Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GBCelkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB".

Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GBCelkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB
Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

General rating:
Griprating-image1.5
86.5mm x 168.8mm x 15.9mm
rating-image3.2
71.8mm x 145.6mm x 8.0mm
Screen qualityrating-image3.7
IPS LCD, 5.5inch, 1080 x 1920
rating-image2.8
IPS LCD, 5.0inch, 720 x 1280
Performancerating-image3.3
Mediatek MT6750, 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores), 3.0GB
rating-image2.4
Broadcom BCM23550, 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores), 2.0GB
Storage sizerating-image3.9
32.0GB
rating-image3.5
16.0GB
Batteryrating-image5.0
9000.0mAh
rating-image3.8
2500.0mAh
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image4.0
16.0MP
rating-image2.5
8.0MP
Front-camera resolutionrating-image4.0
8.0MP
rating-image2.5
2.0MP

What is the difference between the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

The design of Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB

The "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" is 168.8mm long, 86.5mm wide, and 15.9mm thick. It weighs 469.0g.

The design of Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" is 145.6mm long, 71.8mm wide, and 8.0mm thick. It weighs 149.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 23.2mm in length, 14.7mm in width, and 7.9mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" is also much easier to carry around, and scores more points than the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" for portability.

The difference in weight is 320g. The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Ease of holding it in one hand36/10070/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand0/10054/100
Ease of carrying around43/10063/100

Compare the display of the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

Display of the Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB

The "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 400ppi. The "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Display of the Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB". The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?72/10068/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?73/10060/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

Camera performance of Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB

The main camera of the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" has 16.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Camera performance of Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

The main camera of the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 2.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 8MP difference in comparison. The "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

There is a 6MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?80/10050/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?80/10050/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

The processing capability of the Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" uses the Mediatek MT6750 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.

The processing capability of the Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" uses the Broadcom BCM23550 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB", the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB". The "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" than the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB".

Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet79/10070/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games53/10031/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

Battery performance of Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB

The "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 9000.0mAh.

Battery performance of Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 6500mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" over the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB". Both the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/10076/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos100/10055/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

The storage capacity of the Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB

The "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 16GB. "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 112GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games78/10070/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos78/10059/100

Which to buy, the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" or "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" or "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.5inch makes the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" a lot easier to use. The "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB", the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" is overall the clear winner.

Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Handling29/10063/100
Display74/10056/100
CPU specs66/10047/100
General rating70/10056/100

Is it recommended to buy the Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

The "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" is difficult to hold and use compared to other smartphones. People with large hands can probably manage to operate it with one hand, but a smaller, more compact phone would be preferable for most people. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Judging from the overall specs, the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GBCelkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB
Yezz Epic T (2018) 32GBCelkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB
ColorBlackWhite
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)86.5mm x 168.8mm x 15.9mm71.8mm x 145.6mm x 8.0mm
Weight469.0g149.0g
Display size5.5inch5.0inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 1920720 x 1280
Pixel density400ppi293ppi
Battery capacity9000.0mAh2500.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6750Broadcom BCM23550
CPU specs1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size3.0GB2.0GB
Storage size32.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution16.0MP8.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP2.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles