Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB vs ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB: Which is the best?

Created date: 2019-01-08 06:25:08, Updated date: 2020-04-16 21:14:27

vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GBZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GBZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB".

vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GBZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

General rating:
Griprating-image2.9
57/100
rating-image2.7
54/100
Screen qualityrating-image3.3
66/100
rating-image3.1
61/100
Performancerating-image4.7
93/100
rating-image2.4
48/100
Storage sizerating-image3.9
78/100
rating-image3.5
70/100
Batteryrating-image5.0
100/100
rating-image4.5
90/100
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image3.6
72/100
rating-image3.6
72/100
Front-camera resolutionrating-image4.0
80/100
rating-image3.3
65/100

What is the difference between the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"

The design of vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB

The "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" is 155.1mm long, 75.1mm wide, and 8.3mm thick. It weighs 163.5g.

The design of ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is 156.0mm long, 77.5mm wide, and 8.9mm thick. It weighs 156.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 0.9mm in length, 2.4mm in width, and 0.5mm in thickness. "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" is bigger than "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 7.5g. There is very little difference in weight between the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB", meaning that the burden on the hands even when used for a long time is pretty much the same.

vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Ease of holding it in one hand64/10057/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand43/10048/100
Ease of carrying around59/10056/100

Compare the display of the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"

Display of the vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB

The "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1520, and the pixel density is 270ppi. The "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" has a 6.22inch screen size.

Display of the ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.71inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. Both the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. If you compare how well the different phones support mobile games, the display size of "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" makes it more suited for playing games. Both the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" nor the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?77/10072/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?81/10073/100

Compare the camera performances of the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"

Camera performance of vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB

The main camera of the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Camera performance of ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

The main camera of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?72/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?80/10065/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"

The processing capability of the vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" uses the Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.

The processing capability of the ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB", the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 2GB difference in memory capacity. The "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" is the better choice to buy over the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB". The "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" than the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". The "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet96/10071/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games90/10033/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"

Battery performance of vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB

The "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 4030.0mAh.

Battery performance of ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1030mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" over the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". Both the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/10090/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos100/10079/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"

The storage capacity of the vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB

The "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 16GB. "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 16GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" or "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". Both the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games78/10070/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos90/10090/100

Which to buy, the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" or "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" or "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"?

When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". If you want a larger screen, "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" is recommended as it has a 6.22inch screen. The "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB", the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" is overall the clear winner.

vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Handling57/10054/100
Display66/10061/100
CPU specs93/10048/100
General rating77/10063/100

Is it recommended to buy the vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GBZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GBZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
ColorStarry Black/Nebula PurpleBlack
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)75.1mm x 155.1mm x 8.3mm77.5mm x 156.0mm x 8.9mm
Weight163.5g156.0g
Display size6.22inch5.5inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1520720 x 1280
Pixel density270ppi267ppi
Battery capacity4030.0mAh3000.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6762 Helio P22Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425
CPU specs2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size4.0GB2.0GB
Storage size32.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles