Which one is better, the alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB or Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!
Created date: 2019-02-24 05:02:09, Updated date: 2020-04-16 20:11:40
Which do we recommend after comparing the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB".
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" and the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" or "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB"
- 2-1.At the end of the day which is better, the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" or "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB"?
- 2-2.Is it recommended to buy the Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
- 2-3.Is it recommended to buy the alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB, compared with other smartphones?
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" ?
What is the difference between the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" and the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB"
The design of Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB
The "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" is 173.5mm long, 81.6mm wide, and 9.0mm thick. It weighs 214.0g.
The design of alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB
The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is 112.2mm long, 62.0mm wide, and 11.9mm thick. It weighs 98.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 61.3mm in length, 19.5mm in width, and 2.9mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", making it relatively more user-friendly. The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is also much easier to carry around, and scores more points than the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" for portability.
The difference in weight is 116g. The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB | alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 49/100 | 77/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 10/100 | 96/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 52/100 | 68/100 |
Compare the display of the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB"
Display of the Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB
The "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 640 x 1352, and the pixel density is 218ppi. The "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" has a 6.85inch screen size.
Display of the alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB
The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 320 x 480, and the pixel density is 164ppi. The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" has a 3.5inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 3.34inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance. In the gaming end, the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
In terms of display, the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" nor the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB | alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 82/100 | 25/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 88/100 | 15/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB"
Camera performance of Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB
The main camera of the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Camera performance of alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB
The main camera of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" has 2.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 6MP difference in comparison. The "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts.
Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB | alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 50/100 | 20/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 65/100 | - |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB"
The processing capability of the Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" uses the Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
The processing capability of the alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" uses the Mediatek MT6572M SoC. The CPU performance is 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 256.0MB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 253GB difference in memory capacity. The "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" is the better choice to buy over the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB". The "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
The "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" than the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB". The "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB | alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 92/100 | 24/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 76/100 | 4/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB"
Battery performance of Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB
The "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" has a battery capacity of 5000.0mAh.
Battery performance of alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB
The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" has a battery capacity of 1300.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 3700mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" over the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB". The "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB | alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 64/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 40/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB"
The storage capacity of the Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB
The "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB
The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" has 512.0MB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 480GB. The "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 256GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB | alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 78/100 | 2/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 90/100 | 54/100 |
Which to buy, the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" or "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" or "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 6.85inch makes the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" a lot easier to use. The "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" and the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" is overall the clear winner.
Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB | alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 40/100 | 79/100 |
Display | 66/100 | 18/100 |
CPU specs | 85/100 | 14/100 |
General rating | 70/100 | 35/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is smaller than that of standard smartphones. The font size on the screen is also rather small, so it is not suited for reading articles or long texts on the internet. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Archos Oxygen 68XL 32GB | alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB | |
Color | Dark Blue | Black |
OS | Android | Firefox |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 81.6mm x 173.5mm x 9.0mm | 62.0mm x 112.2mm x 11.9mm |
Weight | 214.0g | 98.0g |
Display size | 6.85inch | 3.5inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | TFT |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 640 x 1352 | 320 x 480 |
Pixel density | 218ppi | 164ppi |
Battery capacity | 5000.0mAh | 1300.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 | Mediatek MT6572M |
CPU specs | 2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores) |
RAM size | 3.0GB | 256.0MB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 512.0MB |
Rear-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 2.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |