Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB vs Celkon Q3K Power 8GB: Full Comparison!
Created date: 2019-03-19 06:25:13, Updated date: 2021-10-20 19:27:18
Which do we recommend after comparing the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" and "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" and "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB".
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" and the "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" and "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" and "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" and "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" and "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" and "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" and "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" or "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" and "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" and the "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" and "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB"
The design of Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB
The "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" is 157.0mm long, 77.5mm wide, and 7.0mm thick. It weighs 184.0g.
The design of Celkon Q3K Power 8GB
The "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB" is 125.8mm long, 65.0mm wide, and 9.8mm thick. It weighs 128.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 31.2mm in length, 12.5mm in width, and 2.8mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB" is more compact than "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.
The difference in weight is 56g. The "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB | Celkon Q3K Power 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 61/100 | 75/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 30/100 | 71/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 58/100 | 68/100 |
Compare the display of the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" and "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB"
Display of the Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB
The "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" uses a LTPS IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1440 x 2560, and the pixel density is 515ppi. The "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" has a 5.7inch screen size.
Display of the Celkon Q3K Power 8GB
The "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 800, and the pixel density is 233ppi. The "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB" has a 4.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1.7inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
In terms of display, the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB". The "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB | Celkon Q3K Power 8GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 73/100 | 46/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 75/100 | 25/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" and "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB"
Camera performance of Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB
The main camera of the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" has 12.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Camera performance of Celkon Q3K Power 8GB
The main camera of the "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB" has 15.0MP. The front camera has 3.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 3MP difference in comparison. As for taking photos of scenic places or group photos of people, the rear camera of "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB" is more suited for capturing distant objects. The "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" and the "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 5MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB | Celkon Q3K Power 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 70/100 | 77/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 80/100 | 55/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" and "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB"
The processing capability of the Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" uses the HiSilicon Kirin 960 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.4GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 6.0GB.
The processing capability of the Celkon Q3K Power 8GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB" uses the Spreadtrum 7731G SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB", the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 506GB difference in memory capacity. The "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" has more memory storage, making the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB". The "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" than the "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB". The "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB | Celkon Q3K Power 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 100/100 | 44/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 94/100 | 6/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" and "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB"
Battery performance of Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB
The "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" has a battery capacity of 4000.0mAh.
Battery performance of Celkon Q3K Power 8GB
The "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1000mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For looking things up online, checking SNS, playing games occasionally or for most frequent use, it doesn't feel like there is much difference between the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" and the "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB". Both the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" and the "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
If you're using it frequently, for example playing games for a long time or using it to watch movies, you may feel no difference between the two devices. Both the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" and the "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB | Celkon Q3K Power 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 100/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 100/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" and "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB"
The storage capacity of the Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB
The "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Celkon Q3K Power 8GB
The "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 56GB. The "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 280GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB | Celkon Q3K Power 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 84/100 | 35/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 91/100 | 56/100 |
Which to buy, the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" or "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" or "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.7inch makes the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" a lot easier to use. The "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" and the "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB", the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" is overall the clear winner.
Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB | Celkon Q3K Power 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 52/100 | 72/100 |
Display | 84/100 | 34/100 |
CPU specs | 96/100 | 23/100 |
General rating | 80/100 | 53/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" is a high-end smart phone.
Is it recommended to buy the Celkon Q3K Power 8GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
What are the spec differences between the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" and "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB" and "Celkon Q3K Power 8GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Honor 8 Pro (2017) 64GB | Celkon Q3K Power 8GB | |
Color | Pearl White/Midnight Black/Navy Blue | White/black/gold |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 77.5mm x 157.0mm x 7.0mm | 65.0mm x 125.8mm x 9.8mm |
Weight | 184.0g | 128.0g |
Display size | 5.7inch | 4.0inch |
Display type | LTPS IPS LCD | TFT |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1440 x 2560 | 480 x 800 |
Pixel density | 515ppi | 233ppi |
Battery capacity | 4000.0mAh | 3000.0mAh |
Chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 960 | Spreadtrum 7731G |
CPU specs | 2.4GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 6.0GB | 512.0MB |
Storage size | 64.0GB | 8.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 12.0MP | 15.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 3.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |