Compare Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB vs HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB
Created date: 2019-03-19 05:35:32, Updated date: 2021-10-20 19:43:54
How are the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" and "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" and the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" and "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" and "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" and "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" and "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" and "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" and "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" or "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" and "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" and the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" and "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB"
The design of Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB
The "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" is 156.4mm long, 74.5mm wide, and 8.8mm thick. It weighs 186.0g.
The design of HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB
The "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" is 162.4mm long, 79.8mm wide, and 8.0mm thick. It weighs 170.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 6mm in length, 5.2mm in width, and 0.8mm in thickness. "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" is bigger than "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" and "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 16g. The "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB | HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 64/100 | 54/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 28/100 | 39/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 59/100 | 55/100 |
Compare the display of the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" and "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB"
Display of the Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB
The "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" uses a PLS TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2340, and the pixel density is 409ppi. The "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" has a 6.3inch screen size.
Display of the HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB
The "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" uses a Super LCD5 liquid crystal. The resolution is 1440 x 2560, and the pixel density is 515ppi. The "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" has a 5.7inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.5inch difference in the display sizes. When you actually look at the screen, "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" feels like it has a slightly bigger display. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" and the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. If you compare how well the different phones support mobile games, the display size of "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" makes it more suited for playing games. Both the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" and the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB". The "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB | HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 78/100 | 73/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 82/100 | 75/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" and "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB"
Camera performance of Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB
The main camera of the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Camera performance of HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB
The main camera of the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" has 12.0MP. The front camera has 16.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 1MP difference in comparison. There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" and "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" and the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 8MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB | HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 70/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 80/100 | 100/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" and "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB"
The processing capability of the Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" uses the Exynos 7904 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.8GHz+1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.
The processing capability of the HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 821 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.15GHz+1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB", the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" is the better choice to buy over the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB". The "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" than the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB". The "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB | HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 86/100 | 77/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 80/100 | 60/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" and "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB"
Battery performance of Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB
The "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" has a battery capacity of 5000.0mAh.
Battery performance of HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB
The "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 2000mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" over the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB". Both the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" and the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" and the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB | HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 88/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 76/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" and "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB"
The storage capacity of the Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB
The "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 1024.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB
The "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" has 128.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 1024.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 64GB. "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" unfortunately falls behind here. Both the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" and the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 64GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" or "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB". Both the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" and the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB | HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 84/100 | 90/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 96/100 | 96/100 |
Which to buy, the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" or "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" or "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB"?
When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" and "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB". If choosing based on screen size, there is hardly any difference between "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" and "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB". The "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.
Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB | HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 53/100 | 50/100 |
Display | 80/100 | 84/100 |
CPU specs | 83/100 | 67/100 |
General rating | 79/100 | 76/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" and "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB" and "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Samsung Galaxy M20 64GB | HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB | |
Color | Ocean Blue/Charcoal Black | Brilliant Black/Cosmetic Pink/Ice White/Sapphire Blue |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 74.5mm x 156.4mm x 8.8mm | 79.8mm x 162.4mm x 8.0mm |
Weight | 186.0g | 170.0g |
Display size | 6.3inch | 5.7inch |
Display type | PLS TFT | Super LCD5 |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2340 | 1440 x 2560 |
Pixel density | 409ppi | 515ppi |
Battery capacity | 5000.0mAh | 3000.0mAh |
Chipset | Exynos 7904 | Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 821 |
CPU specs | 1.8GHz+1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 2.15GHz+1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 4.0GB | 4.0GB |
Storage size | 64.0GB | 128.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 12.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 16.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |