Vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB vs Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB: Specs & Scores
Created date: 2019-03-19 05:10:57, Updated date: 2020-04-16 21:10:52
How are the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB | Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB | |||
General rating: | 63.5/100 (The 3619th of all smartphones) | 41.5/100 (The 2644th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 57/100 | 66/100 | ||
Screen quality | 66/100 | 30/100 | ||
Performance | 85/100 | 36/100 | ||
Storage size | 84/100 | 35/100 | ||
Battery | 100/100 | 77/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 72/100 | 50/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 80/100 | 50/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" or "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB" ?
What is the difference between the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB"
The design of vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB
The "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" is 155.1mm long, 75.1mm wide, and 8.3mm thick. It weighs 163.5g.
The design of Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB
The "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB" is 122.0mm long, 60.2mm wide, and 15.3mm thick. It weighs 155.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 33mm in length, 14.8mm in width, and 7mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB" is more compact than "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.
The difference in weight is 8.5g. "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB" weighs less than "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" and is easier to handle.
vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB | Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 64/100 | 74/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 43/100 | 49/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 59/100 | 67/100 |
Compare the display of the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB"
Display of the vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB
The "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1520, and the pixel density is 270ppi. The "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" has a 6.22inch screen size.
Display of the Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB
The "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 800, and the pixel density is 245ppi. The "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB" has a 3.8inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 2.42inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
The display of "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" looks sleeker than that of "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB", and is more suited for everyday use such looking things up on the Internet and playing mobile games. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" nor the "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB | Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 77/100 | 37/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 81/100 | 21/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB"
Camera performance of vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB
The main camera of the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Camera performance of Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB
The main camera of the "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 2.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 5MP difference in comparison. The "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
There is a 6MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB | Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 50/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 80/100 | 50/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB"
The processing capability of the vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" uses the Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
The processing capability of the Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB
The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.5GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB", the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1.5GB difference in memory capacity. The "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" has more memory storage, making the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB". The "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" than the "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB". The "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB | Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 92/100 | 56/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 76/100 | 21/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB"
Battery performance of vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB
The "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" has a battery capacity of 4030.0mAh.
Battery performance of Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB
The "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB" has a battery capacity of 1800.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 2230mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" over the "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB". Both the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB | Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 77/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 56/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB"
The storage capacity of the vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB
The "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB
The "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 56GB. The "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 56GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" or "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB". Both the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB | Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 84/100 | 35/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 91/100 | 90/100 |
Which to buy, the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" or "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" or "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB"?
"Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 6.22inch makes the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" a lot easier to use. The "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB", the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" is overall the clear winner.
vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB | Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 57/100 | 66/100 |
Display | 66/100 | 30/100 |
CPU specs | 85/100 | 36/100 |
General rating | 77/100 | 48/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is smaller than that of standard smartphones. The font size on the screen is also rather small, so it is not suited for reading articles or long texts on the internet. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
vivo Y91 (Mediatek) 64GB | Samsung Galaxy Folder 8GB | |
Color | Starry Black/Ocean Blue | Black/White |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 75.1mm x 155.1mm x 8.3mm | 60.2mm x 122.0mm x 15.3mm |
Weight | 163.5g | 155.0g |
Display size | 6.22inch | 3.8inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | TFT |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1520 | 480 x 800 |
Pixel density | 270ppi | 245ppi |
Battery capacity | 4030.0mAh | 1800.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 | |
CPU specs | 2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 3.0GB | 1.5GB |
Storage size | 64.0GB | 8.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 8.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 2.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |