Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB vs Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB: Full Comparison!
Created date: 2019-03-19 06:41:57, Updated date: 2021-10-20 18:37:24
How are the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" or "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
The design of Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB
The "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" is 157.5mm long, 74.7mm wide, and 7.6mm thick. It weighs 173.0g.
The design of Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is 161.7mm long, 80.9mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 210.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 4.1mm in length, 6.2mm in width, and 0.3mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" is more compact than "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.
The difference in weight is 37g. The "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB | Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 66/100 | 52/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 37/100 | 12/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 60/100 | 54/100 |
Compare the display of the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
Display of the Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB
The "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2340, and the pixel density is 403ppi. The "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" has a 6.39inch screen size.
Display of the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 367ppi. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has a 6.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.38inch difference in the display sizes. When you actually look at the screen, "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" feels like it has a slightly bigger display. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size. Both the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB".
Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB | Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 79/100 | 76/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 83/100 | 78/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
Camera performance of Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB
The main camera of the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" has 48.0MP. The front camera has 20.0MP.
Camera performance of Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
The main camera of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has 16.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 32MP difference in comparison. The "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 12MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB | Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 100/100 | 80/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 100/100 | 80/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
The processing capability of the Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" uses the Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.78GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 8.0GB.
The processing capability of the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 4GB difference in memory capacity. The "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" has more memory storage, making the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". For people who mostly use their phone to look up things on the internet, watch videos, or occasionally play mini games, the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" edges out the competition. Both the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" than the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". Both the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB | Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 100/100 | 85/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 97/100 | 79/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
Battery performance of Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB
The "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" has a battery capacity of 3300.0mAh.
Battery performance of Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 5000.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1700mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For average daily use, for example looking things up online, SNS, gaming or occasionally checking your screen I can recommend the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" slightly more. Both the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB | Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 94/100 | 100/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 85/100 | 100/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
The storage capacity of the Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB
The "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" has 256.0GB of internal memory.
The storage capacity of the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 224GB. The "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.
Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB | Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 90/100 | 78/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | - | 90/100 |
Which to buy, the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" or "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" or "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" is a great choice. If you want a larger screen, "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" is recommended as it has a 6.39inch screen. The "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" also hands down has the superior specs. When comparing "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" overall, "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.
Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB | Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 56/100 | 42/100 |
Display | 80/100 | 74/100 |
CPU specs | 98/100 | 82/100 |
General rating | 83/100 | 75/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" is a high-end smart phone.
Is it recommended to buy the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
What are the spec differences between the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Xiaomi Mi 9 (2019) 256GB | Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | |
Color | Lavender Violet/Ocean Blue/Piano Black | White/Black/Gold |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 74.7mm x 157.5mm x 7.6mm | 80.9mm x 161.7mm x 7.9mm |
Weight | 173.0g | 210.0g |
Display size | 6.39inch | 6.0inch |
Display type | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2340 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 403ppi | 367ppi |
Battery capacity | 3300.0mAh | 5000.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 | Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652 |
CPU specs | 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.78GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 8.0GB | 4.0GB |
Storage size | 256.0GB | 32.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 48.0MP | 16.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 20.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |