Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB vs Plum Sync 3.5 512MB: Which is the best?

Created date: 2019-03-19 06:02:24, Updated date: 2020-04-16 14:30:46

Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GBPlum Sync 3.5 512MB
Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GBPlum Sync 3.5 512MB

How are the "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" and "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GBPlum Sync 3.5 512MB
Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB

Plum Sync 3.5 512MB

General rating:

42.2/100

(The 3952th of all smartphones)

30.7/100

(The 1965th of all smartphones)

Grip
74/100
88/100
Screen quality
50/100
18/100
Performance
48/100
15/100
Storage size
70/100
2/100
Battery
77/100
61/100
Rear-camera resolution
50/100
25/100
Front-camera resolution
80/100
55/100

What is the difference between the "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" and the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" and "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB"

The design of Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB

The "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" is 139.0mm long, 65.8mm wide, and 8.8mm thick. It weighs 120.0g.

The design of Plum Sync 3.5 512MB

The "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" is 118.4mm long, 56.2mm wide, and 9.8mm thick. It weighs 93.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 20.5mm in length, 9.5mm in width, and 1mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" is more compact than "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.

The difference in weight is 27g. The "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB

Plum Sync 3.5 512MB

Ease of holding it in one hand76/10088/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand78/100100/100
Ease of carrying around68/10077/100

Compare the display of the "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" and "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB"

Display of the Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB

The "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 960, and the pixel density is 214ppi. The "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Display of the Plum Sync 3.5 512MB

The "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 320 x 480, and the pixel density is 164ppi. The "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" has a 3.5inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 1.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" nor the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB

Plum Sync 3.5 512MB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?68/10025/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?60/10015/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" and "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB"

Camera performance of Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB

The main camera of the "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Camera performance of Plum Sync 3.5 512MB

The main camera of the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" has 3.0MP. The front camera has 3.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 5MP difference in comparison. The "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts.

There is a 5MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB

Plum Sync 3.5 512MB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?50/10025/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?80/10055/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" and "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB"

The processing capability of the Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6580M SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

The processing capability of the Plum Sync 3.5 512MB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" uses the Mediatek MT6572M SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 256.0MB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB", the "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 254GB difference in memory capacity. The "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" has more memory storage, making the "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB". The "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

The "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" than the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB". The "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB

Plum Sync 3.5 512MB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet71/10027/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games32/1004/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" and "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB"

Battery performance of Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB

The "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2000.0mAh.

Battery performance of Plum Sync 3.5 512MB

The "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" has a battery capacity of 1350.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 650mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" over the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB". The "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use.

Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB

Plum Sync 3.5 512MB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet77/10061/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos57/10038/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" and "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB"

The storage capacity of the Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB

The "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the Plum Sync 3.5 512MB

The "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" has 512.0MB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 496GB. The "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 16GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" is recommended over "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" if you save a lot of movies to watch on your phone, or if you save a lot of photos.

Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB

Plum Sync 3.5 512MB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games70/1002/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos59/10054/100

Which to buy, the "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" or "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" or "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.0inch makes the "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" a lot easier to use. The "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" and the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB", the "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" is overall the clear winner.

Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB

Plum Sync 3.5 512MB

Handling74/10088/100
Display50/10018/100
CPU specs48/10015/100
General rating59/10038/100

Is it recommended to buy the Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Judging from the overall specs, the "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

Is it recommended to buy the Plum Sync 3.5 512MB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" looks compact, and is quite excellent in its ease of being held. It is recommended if you are looking for a device that can be easily operated and held with one hand. The screen size is smaller than that of standard smartphones. The font size on the screen is also rather small, so it is not suited for reading articles or long texts on the internet. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" and "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GB" and "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GBPlum Sync 3.5 512MB
Yezz Max 1 (2018) 16GBPlum Sync 3.5 512MB
ColorBlackBlack/White/Red/Blue/Pink
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)65.8mm x 139.0mm x 8.8mm56.2mm x 118.4mm x 9.8mm
Weight120.0g93.0g
Display size5.0inch3.5inch
Display typeTFTTFT
Screen resolution (width x height)480 x 960320 x 480
Pixel density214ppi164ppi
Battery capacity2000.0mAh1350.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6580MMediatek MT6572M
CPU specs1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.2GHz×2(2.0-cores)
RAM size2.0GB256.0MB
Storage size16.0GB512.0MB
Rear-camera resolution8.0MP3.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP3.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles