Vivo X27 (2019) 256GB vs BQ Aquaris U 16GB: Full Comparison!
Created date: 2019-03-20 05:38:51, Updated date: 2021-10-20 18:46:03
Which do we recommend after comparing the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB".
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" and the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" or "BQ Aquaris U 16GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" and the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB"
The design of vivo X27 (2019) 256GB
The "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" is 157.7mm long, 74.3mm wide, and 9.0mm thick. It weighs 188.0g.
The design of BQ Aquaris U 16GB
The "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is 145.0mm long, 71.5mm wide, and 8.3mm thick. It weighs 140.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 12.6mm in length, 2.7mm in width, and 0.6mm in thickness. "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is bigger than "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 48g. The "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
vivo X27 (2019) 256GB | BQ Aquaris U 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 64/100 | 70/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 27/100 | 61/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 59/100 | 63/100 |
Compare the display of the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB"
Display of the vivo X27 (2019) 256GB
The "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2340, and the pixel density is 403ppi. The "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" has a 6.39inch screen size.
Display of the BQ Aquaris U 16GB
The "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1.38inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB". The "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
vivo X27 (2019) 256GB | BQ Aquaris U 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 79/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 83/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB"
Camera performance of vivo X27 (2019) 256GB
The main camera of the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" has 48.0MP. The front camera has 16.0MP.
Camera performance of BQ Aquaris U 16GB
The main camera of the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 35MP difference in comparison. The "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" and the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 11MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
vivo X27 (2019) 256GB | BQ Aquaris U 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 100/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 100/100 | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB"
The processing capability of the vivo X27 (2019) 256GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" uses the Qualcomm SDM710 Snapdragon 710 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.2GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 8.0GB.
The processing capability of the BQ Aquaris U 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8937 Snapdragon 430 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB", the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 6GB difference in memory capacity. The "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" has more memory storage, making the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" is the better choice to buy over the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB". Both the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" and the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" than the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB". The "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
vivo X27 (2019) 256GB | BQ Aquaris U 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 100/100 | 78/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 97/100 | 43/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB"
Battery performance of vivo X27 (2019) 256GB
The "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" has a battery capacity of 4000.0mAh.
Battery performance of BQ Aquaris U 16GB
The "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" has a battery capacity of 3080.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 920mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For average daily use, for example looking things up online, SNS, gaming or occasionally checking your screen I can recommend the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" slightly more. Both the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" and the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" and the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
vivo X27 (2019) 256GB | BQ Aquaris U 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 94/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 86/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB"
The storage capacity of the vivo X27 (2019) 256GB
The "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" has 256.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the BQ Aquaris U 16GB
The "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 240GB. The "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 240GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" or "BQ Aquaris U 16GB". Both the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" and the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
vivo X27 (2019) 256GB | BQ Aquaris U 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 90/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 95/100 | 90/100 |
Which to buy, the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" or "BQ Aquaris U 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" or "BQ Aquaris U 16GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 6.39inch makes the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" a lot easier to use. The "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" and the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB", the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" is overall the clear winner.
vivo X27 (2019) 256GB | BQ Aquaris U 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 52/100 | 65/100 |
Display | 80/100 | 56/100 |
CPU specs | 98/100 | 61/100 |
General rating | 86/100 | 66/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the vivo X27 (2019) 256GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" is a high-end smart phone.
Is it recommended to buy the BQ Aquaris U 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
What are the spec differences between the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "vivo X27 (2019) 256GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
vivo X27 (2019) 256GB | BQ Aquaris U 16GB | |
Color | Blue/Gold/Symphony Summer | Black |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 74.3mm x 157.7mm x 9.0mm | 71.5mm x 145.0mm x 8.3mm |
Weight | 188.0g | 140.0g |
Display size | 6.39inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2340 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 403ppi | 293ppi |
Battery capacity | 4000.0mAh | 3080.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SDM710 Snapdragon 710 | Qualcomm MSM8937 Snapdragon 430 |
CPU specs | 2.2GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 8.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 256.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 48.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 16.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |