Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB vs alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB: Which is the best?

Created date: 2019-05-03 05:17:16, Updated date: 2020-04-15 18:36:04

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GBalcatel Flash (2017) 32GB
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GBalcatel Flash (2017) 32GB

How are the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" and "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GBalcatel Flash (2017) 32GB
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB

alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB

General rating:
Griprating-image2.1
42/100
rating-image2.9
57/100
Screen qualityrating-image4.0
80/100
rating-image3.7
74/100
Performancerating-image5.0
99/100
rating-image4.3
86/100
Storage sizerating-image4.5
90/100
rating-image3.9
78/100
Batteryrating-image5.0
100/100
rating-image4.6
92/100
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image5.0
100/100
rating-image3.6
72/100
Front-camera resolutionrating-image5.0
100/100
rating-image4.0
80/100

What is the difference between the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" and the "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" and "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB"

The design of ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB

The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" is 171.7mm long, 78.5mm wide, and 9.7mm thick. It weighs 215.0g.

The design of alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB

The "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB" is 152.6mm long, 75.4mm wide, and 8.7mm thick. It weighs 155.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 19mm in length, 3mm in width, and 1mm in thickness. "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB" is bigger than "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" and "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 60g. The "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB

alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB

Ease of holding it in one hand54/10062/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand9/10049/100
Ease of carrying around54/10059/100

Compare the display of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" and "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB"

Display of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB

The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" uses a AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2340, and the pixel density is 387ppi. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" has a 6.65inch screen size.

Display of the alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB

The "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 400ppi. The "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 1.15inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. Both the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" and the "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" offers a more suitable screen size. Both the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" and the "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" and "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB

alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?81/10072/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?86/10073/100

Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" and "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB"

Camera performance of ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB

The main camera of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" has 48.0MP. The front camera has 16.0MP.

Camera performance of alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB

The main camera of the "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 35MP difference in comparison. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" and the "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is a 8MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB

alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?100/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?100/10080/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" and "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB"

The processing capability of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" uses the Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.78GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 12.0GB.

The processing capability of the alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB" uses the Mediatek MT6797 Helio X20 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.3GHz+1.9GHz+1.4GHz×10(10.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

"ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" has a slightly better CPU performance and better specs overall. This is a 9GB difference in memory capacity. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" has more memory storage, making the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For using fundamental features such as calls, emails, messages and using SNS, I am more inclined to recommend the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB". For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" and the "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB" equally. Both the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" and the "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is basically no difference between "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" and "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" than the "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB". Both the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" and the "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB

alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet100/10093/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games99/10078/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" and "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB"

Battery performance of ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB

The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" has a battery capacity of 5000.0mAh.

Battery performance of alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB

The "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3100.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1900mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" over the "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB". Both the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" and the "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" and the "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB

alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/10092/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos100/10083/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" and "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB"

The storage capacity of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB

The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" has 256.0GB of internal memory.

The storage capacity of the alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB

The "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 224GB. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB

alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games90/10078/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos - 90/100

Which to buy, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" or "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" or "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB" is a great choice. If you want a larger screen, "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" is recommended as it has a 6.65inch screen. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" also hands down has the superior specs. When comparing "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" and "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB" overall, "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB

alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB

Handling42/10057/100
Display80/10074/100
CPU specs99/10086/100
General rating83/10075/100

Is it recommended to buy the ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" is a high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" and "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GB" and "alcatel Flash (2017) 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GBalcatel Flash (2017) 32GB
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3 256GBalcatel Flash (2017) 32GB
ColorBlack/Red/Camouflage/Red+BlueTitanium Grey
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)78.5mm x 171.7mm x 9.7mm75.4mm x 152.6mm x 8.7mm
Weight215.0g155.0g
Display size6.65inch5.5inch
Display typeAMOLEDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 23401080 x 1920
Pixel density387ppi400ppi
Battery capacity5000.0mAh3100.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855Mediatek MT6797 Helio X20
CPU specs2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.78GHz×8(8.0-cores)2.3GHz+1.9GHz+1.4GHz×10(10.0-cores)
RAM size12.0GB3.0GB
Storage size256.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution48.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution16.0MP8.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles