ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB vs Lava Icon (2015) 16GB: Which is the best?
Created date: 2019-05-08 04:21:49, Updated date: 2020-04-16 17:27:14
Which do we recommend after comparing the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" and "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" and "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB".
ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB | Lava Icon (2015) 16GB | |||
General rating: | 79/100 (The 3064th of all smartphones) | 55/100 (The 2276th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 57/100 | 65/100 | ||
Screen quality | 80/100 | 56/100 | ||
Performance | 99/100 | 48/100 | ||
Storage size | 90/100 | 70/100 | ||
Battery | 100/100 | 79/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 100/100 | 72/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 100/100 | 65/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" and the "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" and "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" and "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" and "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" and "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" and "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" and "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" or "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" and "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" and the "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" and "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB"
The design of ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB
The "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" is 159.2mm long, 73.4mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 175.0g.
The design of Lava Icon (2015) 16GB
The "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB" is 143.4mm long, 70.6mm wide, and 7.7mm thick. It weighs 143.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 15.7mm in length, 2.8mm in width, and 0.2mm in thickness. Both the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" and "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB" is bigger than "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" and "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 32g. The "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB | Lava Icon (2015) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 68/100 | 71/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 36/100 | 59/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 62/100 | 64/100 |
Compare the display of the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" and "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB"
Display of the ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB
The "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" uses a AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2340, and the pixel density is 398ppi. The "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" has a 6.47inch screen size.
Display of the Lava Icon (2015) 16GB
The "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1.46inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB". The "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB | Lava Icon (2015) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 79/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 84/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" and "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB"
Camera performance of ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB
The main camera of the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" has 48.0MP. The front camera has 20.0MP.
Camera performance of Lava Icon (2015) 16GB
The main camera of the "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 35MP difference in comparison. The "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" and the "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 15MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB | Lava Icon (2015) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 100/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 100/100 | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" and "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB"
The processing capability of the ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" uses the Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.78GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 12.0GB.
The processing capability of the Lava Icon (2015) 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB" uses the Cortex-A7 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB", the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 10GB difference in memory capacity. The "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" has more memory storage, making the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB". The "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" than the "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB". The "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB | Lava Icon (2015) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 100/100 | 71/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 99/100 | 32/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" and "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB"
Battery performance of ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB
The "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" has a battery capacity of 4000.0mAh.
Battery performance of Lava Icon (2015) 16GB
The "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1500mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" over the "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB". Both the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" and the "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB | Lava Icon (2015) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 79/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" and "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB"
The storage capacity of the ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB
The "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" has 256.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 1024.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Lava Icon (2015) 16GB
The "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 240GB. The "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 1232GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB | Lava Icon (2015) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 90/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 96/100 | 59/100 |
Which to buy, the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" or "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" or "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB"?
"Lava Icon (2015) 16GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 6.47inch makes the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" a lot easier to use. The "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" and the "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB", the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" is overall the clear winner.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB | Lava Icon (2015) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 57/100 | 65/100 |
Display | 80/100 | 56/100 |
CPU specs | 99/100 | 48/100 |
General rating | 87/100 | 60/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" is a high-end smart phone.
Is it recommended to buy the Lava Icon (2015) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" and "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB" and "Lava Icon (2015) 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro 256GB | Lava Icon (2015) 16GB | |
Color | Blue | Black |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 73.4mm x 159.2mm x 7.9mm | 70.6mm x 143.4mm x 7.7mm |
Weight | 175.0g | 143.0g |
Display size | 6.47inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2340 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 398ppi | 293ppi |
Battery capacity | 4000.0mAh | 2500.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 | Cortex-A7 |
CPU specs | 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.78GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 12.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 256.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 48.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 20.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |