Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Compare ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB vs BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB

Created date: 2019-05-24 06:16:31, Updated date: 2020-04-16 21:04:34

ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GBBLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB
ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GBBLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB".

ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GBBLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB
ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB

BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB

General rating:

55.9/100

(The 3826th of all smartphones)

51.3/100

(The 566th of all smartphones)

Grip
62/100
47/100
Screen quality
63/100
61/100
Performance
56/100
56/100
Storage size
70/100
78/100
Battery
89/100
100/100
Rear-camera resolution
72/100
72/100
Front-camera resolution
80/100
65/100

What is the difference between the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and the "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB"

The design of ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB

The "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" is 145.8mm long, 70.0mm wide, and 9.6mm thick. It weighs 157.0g.

The design of BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB

The "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" is 153.0mm long, 76.6mm wide, and 10.5mm thick. It weighs 191.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 7.1mm in length, 6.5mm in width, and 0.9mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" is more compact than "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.

The difference in weight is 34g. The "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB

BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB

Ease of holding it in one hand70/10056/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand48/10025/100
Ease of carrying around63/10055/100

Compare the display of the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB"

Display of the ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB

The "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1440, and the pixel density is 295ppi. The "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" has a 5.45inch screen size.

Display of the BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB

The "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.04inch difference in the display sizes. When actually viewing the two phones' onscreen displays, it is obvious that they are roughly the same size. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and the "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size. Both the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and the "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The display of "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" looks sleeker than that of "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB", and is more suited for everyday use such looking things up on the Internet and playing mobile games. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" nor the "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB

BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?71/10072/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?72/10073/100

Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB"

Camera performance of ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB

The main camera of the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Camera performance of BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB

The main camera of the "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and the "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB

BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?72/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?80/10065/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB"

The processing capability of the ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" uses the Unisoc SC9863A SoC. The CPU performance is 1.6GHz+1.2GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

The processing capability of the BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" uses the Mediatek MT6737 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

"ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" has a slightly better CPU performance and better specs overall. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and the "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" are not large at all. For people who mostly use their phone to look up things on the internet, watch videos, or occasionally play mini games, the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" edges out the competition.

For playing 2D and simpler 3D games, "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" is more suitable as the games are less likely to stall. For playing more memory-intensive 3D games, it is better to go with "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" as it has better performance.

ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB

BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet76/10073/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games39/10045/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB"

Battery performance of ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB

The "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2600.0mAh.

Battery performance of BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB

The "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 4000.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1400mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" over the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB". Both the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and the "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and the "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB

BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet89/100100/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos77/100100/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB"

The storage capacity of the ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB

The "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB

The "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 16GB. "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 176GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. Both the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and the "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB

BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games70/10078/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos90/10070/100

Which to buy, the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" or "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" or "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" is a great choice. If choosing based on screen size, there is hardly any difference between "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB". There isn't much difference between "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" in terms of performance or specifications. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.

ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB

BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB

Handling62/10047/100
Display63/10061/100
CPU specs56/10056/100
General rating66/10066/100

Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GBBLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB
ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GBBLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB
ColorBlack/BlueBlack
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)70.0mm x 145.8mm x 9.6mm76.6mm x 153.0mm x 10.5mm
Weight157.0g191.0g
Display size5.45inch5.5inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1440720 x 1280
Pixel density295ppi267ppi
Battery capacity2600.0mAh4000.0mAh
ChipsetUnisoc SC9863AMediatek MT6737
CPU specs1.6GHz+1.2GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size2.0GB3.0GB
Storage size16.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles