Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Compare ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB vs Allview E3 Sign 16GB

Created date: 2019-05-24 05:30:06, Updated date: 2020-04-16 17:42:27

ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GBAllview E3 Sign 16GB
ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GBAllview E3 Sign 16GB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "Allview E3 Sign 16GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "Allview E3 Sign 16GB".

ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GBAllview E3 Sign 16GB
ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB

Allview E3 Sign 16GB

General rating:
Griprating-image3.1
70.0mm x 145.8mm x 9.6mm
rating-image2.8
75.9mm x 152.5mm x 9.3mm
Screen qualityrating-image3.2
IPS LCD, 5.45inch, 720 x 1440
rating-image3.1
IPS LCD, 5.5inch, 720 x 1280
Performancerating-image2.8
Unisoc SC9863A, 1.6GHz+1.2GHz×8(8.0-cores), 2.0GB
rating-image2.4
Mediatek MT6582, 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores), 2.0GB
Storage sizerating-image3.5
16.0GB
rating-image3.5
16.0GB
Batteryrating-image4.5
2600.0mAh
rating-image4.0
2800.0mAh
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image3.6
13.0MP
rating-image2.5
8.0MP
Front-camera resolutionrating-image4.0
8.0MP
rating-image2.5
2.0MP

What is the difference between the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and the "Allview E3 Sign 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "Allview E3 Sign 16GB"

The design of ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB

The "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" is 145.8mm long, 70.0mm wide, and 9.6mm thick. It weighs 157.0g.

The design of Allview E3 Sign 16GB

The "Allview E3 Sign 16GB" is 152.5mm long, 75.9mm wide, and 9.3mm thick. It weighs 161.9g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 6.6mm in length, 5.9mm in width, and 0.2mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" easier to use and carry around. "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" is bigger than "Allview E3 Sign 16GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Also, "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" is more compact than "Allview E3 Sign 16GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.

The difference in weight is 4.9g. There is very little difference in weight between the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "Allview E3 Sign 16GB", meaning that the burden on the hands even when used for a long time is pretty much the same.

ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB

Allview E3 Sign 16GB

Ease of holding it in one hand70/10060/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand48/10044/100
Ease of carrying around63/10057/100

Compare the display of the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "Allview E3 Sign 16GB"

Display of the ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB

The "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1440, and the pixel density is 295ppi. The "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" has a 5.45inch screen size.

Display of the Allview E3 Sign 16GB

The "Allview E3 Sign 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "Allview E3 Sign 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.04inch difference in the display sizes. When actually viewing the two phones' onscreen displays, it is obvious that they are roughly the same size. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and the "Allview E3 Sign 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size. Both the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and the "Allview E3 Sign 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The display of "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" looks sleeker than that of "Allview E3 Sign 16GB", and is more suited for everyday use such looking things up on the Internet and playing mobile games. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" nor the "Allview E3 Sign 16GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB

Allview E3 Sign 16GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?71/10072/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?72/10073/100

Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "Allview E3 Sign 16GB"

Camera performance of ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB

The main camera of the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Camera performance of Allview E3 Sign 16GB

The main camera of the "Allview E3 Sign 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 2.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 5MP difference in comparison. The "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

There is a 6MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB

Allview E3 Sign 16GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?72/10050/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?80/10050/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "Allview E3 Sign 16GB"

The processing capability of the ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" uses the Unisoc SC9863A SoC. The CPU performance is 1.6GHz+1.2GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

The processing capability of the Allview E3 Sign 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Allview E3 Sign 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6582 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Allview E3 Sign 16GB", the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.

For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and the "Allview E3 Sign 16GB" are not large at all. Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB".

The "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. For playing more memory-intensive 3D games, it is better to go with "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" as it has better performance.

ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB

Allview E3 Sign 16GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet76/10071/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games39/10032/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "Allview E3 Sign 16GB"

Battery performance of ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB

The "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2600.0mAh.

Battery performance of Allview E3 Sign 16GB

The "Allview E3 Sign 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2800.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 200mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" over the "Allview E3 Sign 16GB". Both the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and the "Allview E3 Sign 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB

Allview E3 Sign 16GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet89/10080/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos77/10062/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "Allview E3 Sign 16GB"

The storage capacity of the ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB

The "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the Allview E3 Sign 16GB

The "Allview E3 Sign 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

If you are only downloading a few games and apps (such as SNS) to use on your phone, it really doesn't matter if you choose "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" or "Allview E3 Sign 16GB". If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 224GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB

Allview E3 Sign 16GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games70/10070/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos90/10059/100

Which to buy, the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" or "Allview E3 Sign 16GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" or "Allview E3 Sign 16GB"?

"ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. If choosing based on screen size, there is hardly any difference between "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "Allview E3 Sign 16GB". "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" is better for users who prefer better functionality and specs. When comparing "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "Allview E3 Sign 16GB" overall, "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.

ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB

Allview E3 Sign 16GB

Handling62/10055/100
Display63/10061/100
CPU specs56/10048/100
General rating66/10056/100

Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Allview E3 Sign 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Allview E3 Sign 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Judging from the overall specs, the "Allview E3 Sign 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "Allview E3 Sign 16GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GB" and "Allview E3 Sign 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GBAllview E3 Sign 16GB
ZTE Blade A5 (2019) 16GBAllview E3 Sign 16GB
ColorBlack/BlueBlack
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)70.0mm x 145.8mm x 9.6mm75.9mm x 152.5mm x 9.3mm
Weight157.0g161.9g
Display size5.45inch5.5inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1440720 x 1280
Pixel density295ppi267ppi
Battery capacity2600.0mAh2800.0mAh
ChipsetUnisoc SC9863AMediatek MT6582
CPU specs1.6GHz+1.2GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size2.0GB2.0GB
Storage size16.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP8.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP2.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles