Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

A comparive review of the differences between the Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB and ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB. We covered a wide range of variables

Created date: 2019-05-24 06:24:31, Updated date: 2022-06-01 18:31:41

ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GBEnergizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB
ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GBEnergizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB

How are the "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" and "Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GBEnergizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB
ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB

Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB

General rating:
Griprating-image3.3
67.5mm x 137.4mm x 10.5mm
rating-image2.3
72.0mm x 134.0mm x 15.0mm
Screen qualityrating-image2.5
IPS LCD, 5.0inch, 480 x 960
rating-image1.7
TN TFT, 4.0inch, 480 x 800
Performancerating-image1.5
Unisoc SC9832E, 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores), 1.0GB
rating-image1.4
Mediatek MT6737M, 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores), 1.0GB
Storage sizerating-image3.5
16.0GB
rating-image1.8
8.0GB
Batteryrating-image4.0
2000.0mAh
rating-image5.0
2500.0mAh
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image2.5
8.0MP
rating-image2.5
8.0MP
Front-camera resolutionrating-image3.3
5.0MP
rating-image2.8
3.0MP

What is the difference between the "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" and the "Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" and "Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB"

The design of ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB

The "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" is 137.4mm long, 67.5mm wide, and 10.5mm thick. It weighs 144.0g.

The design of Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB

The "Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB" is 134.0mm long, 72.0mm wide, and 15.0mm thick. It weighs 204.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 3.4mm in length, 4.5mm in width, and 4.5mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" is more compact than "Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.

The difference in weight is 60g. The "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB

Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB

Ease of holding it in one hand71/10056/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand58/10016/100
Ease of carrying around64/10056/100

Compare the display of the "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" and "Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB"

Display of the ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB

The "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 960, and the pixel density is 214ppi. The "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Display of the Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB

The "Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB" uses a TN TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 800, and the pixel density is 233ppi. The "Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB" has a 4.0inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 1inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. In the gaming end, the "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

The display of "Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB" looks sleeker than that of "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB", and is more suited for everyday use such looking things up on the Internet and playing mobile games. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" nor the "Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB

Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?68/10046/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?60/10025/100

Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" and "Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB"

Camera performance of ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB

The main camera of the "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Camera performance of Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB

The main camera of the "Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 3.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" and "Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones.

There is a 2MP difference in front camera pixel number. When taking photos of distant objects, including photos taken using a selfie stick or photos that require clear backgrounds, the camera of "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" has better performance. The "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB

Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?50/10050/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?65/10055/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" and "Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB"

The processing capability of the ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" uses the Unisoc SC9832E SoC. The CPU performance is 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.

The processing capability of the Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB" uses the Mediatek MT6737M SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

The CPU specs are the same for both phones. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.

For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" and the "Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB" are not large at all. For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" and the "Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB" equally.

There is basically no difference between "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" and "Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. Functionality is about the same for full-scale 3D games, no matter which phone model is used. Neither the "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" nor the "Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB

Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet50/10047/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games12/10012/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" and "Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB"

Battery performance of ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB

The "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2000.0mAh.

Battery performance of Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB

The "Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 500mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

If you use the phone infrequently for just making calls or checking the time, I think the "Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB" is a bit better. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB" over the "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB". Both the "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" and the "Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB

Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet80/10099/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos62/10094/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" and "Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB"

The storage capacity of the ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB

The "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB

The "Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 8GB. The "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 72GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB

Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games70/10035/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos76/10066/100

Which to buy, the "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" or "Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" or "Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.0inch makes the "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" a lot easier to use. There isn't much difference between "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" and "Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB" in terms of performance or specifications. When comparing "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" and "Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB" overall, "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.

ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB

Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB

Handling66/10045/100
Display50/10034/100
CPU specs29/10028/100
General rating55/10047/100

Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

Is it recommended to buy the Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" and "Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GB" and "Energizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GBEnergizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB
ZTE Blade A3 (2019) 16GBEnergizer Energy 400 LTE 8GB
ColorBlack/BlueBlack
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)67.5mm x 137.4mm x 10.5mm72.0mm x 134.0mm x 15.0mm
Weight144.0g204.0g
Display size5.0inch4.0inch
Display typeIPS LCDTN TFT
Screen resolution (width x height)480 x 960480 x 800
Pixel density214ppi233ppi
Battery capacity2000.0mAh2500.0mAh
ChipsetUnisoc SC9832EMediatek MT6737M
CPU specs1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size1.0GB1.0GB
Storage size16.0GB8.0GB
Rear-camera resolution8.0MP8.0MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP3.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles