Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB vs Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB

Created date: 2019-05-31 06:19:15, Updated date: 2021-10-20 23:11:37

Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GBCelkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB
Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GBCelkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" and "Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" and "Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB".

Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GBCelkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB
Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB

Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB

General rating:
Griprating-image2.9
74.4mm x 152.0mm x 8.3mm
rating-image3.1
73.0mm x 145.0mm x 8.8mm
Screen qualityrating-image3.9
Super AMOLED, 6.2inch, 1080 x 2232
rating-image2.4
IPS LCD, 5.0inch, 480 x 854
Performancerating-image4.8
Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675, 2.0GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores), 6.0GB
rating-image1.4
Spreadtrum 7731, 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores), 1.0GB
Storage sizerating-image4.5
128.0GB
rating-image1.8
8.0GB
Batteryrating-image5.0
4000.0mAh
rating-image3.5
2000.0mAh
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image5.0
48.0MP
rating-image1.8
5.0MP
Front-camera resolutionrating-image5.0
16.0MP
rating-image3.3
5.0MP

What is the difference between the "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" and the "Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" and "Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB"

The design of Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB

The "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" is 152.0mm long, 74.4mm wide, and 8.3mm thick. It weighs 165.0g.

The design of Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB

The "Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB" is 145.0mm long, 73.0mm wide, and 8.8mm thick. It weighs 150.6g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 7mm in length, 1.4mm in width, and 0.5mm in thickness. Both the "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" and "Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" and "Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB". Both the "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" and "Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 14.4g. The "Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB

Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB

Ease of holding it in one hand65/10067/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand42/10052/100
Ease of carrying around60/10061/100

Compare the display of the "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" and "Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB"

Display of the Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB

The "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2232, and the pixel density is 399ppi. The "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" has a 6.2inch screen size.

Display of the Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB

The "Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 854, and the pixel density is 195ppi. The "Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 1.2inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. The "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB". The "Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB

Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?77/10068/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?81/10060/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" and "Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB"

Camera performance of Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB

The main camera of the "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" has 48.0MP. The front camera has 16.0MP.

Camera performance of Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB

The main camera of the "Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB" has 5.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 43MP difference in comparison. The "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

There is a 11MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB

Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?100/10035/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?100/10065/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" and "Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB"

The processing capability of the Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" uses the Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.0GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 6.0GB.

The processing capability of the Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB" uses the Spreadtrum 7731 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB", the "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 5GB difference in memory capacity. The "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" has more memory storage, making the "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB". The "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" than the "Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB". The "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB

Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet95/10044/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games94/10011/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" and "Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB"

Battery performance of Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB

The "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" has a battery capacity of 4000.0mAh.

Battery performance of Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB

The "Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB" has a battery capacity of 2000.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 2000mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" over the "Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB". Both the "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" and the "Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB

Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/10070/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos100/10044/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" and "Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB"

The storage capacity of the Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB

The "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" has 128.0GB of internal memory.

The storage capacity of the Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB

The "Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 120GB. The "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.

Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB

Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games90/10035/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos - 56/100

Which to buy, the "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" or "Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" or "Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB"?

When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" and "Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB". Its perfect screen size of 6.2inch makes the "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" a lot easier to use. The "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" and the "Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB", the "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" is overall the clear winner.

Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB

Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB

Handling57/10061/100
Display78/10048/100
CPU specs95/10027/100
General rating84/10046/100

Is it recommended to buy the Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" is a high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" and "Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GB" and "Celkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GBCelkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB
Meizu 16Xs (2019) 128GBCelkon Q54+ (2015) 8GB
ColorCarbon Black/Pearl White/Phantom BlueBlue/Brown/White/Silver
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)74.4mm x 152.0mm x 8.3mm73.0mm x 145.0mm x 8.8mm
Weight165.0g150.6g
Display size6.2inch5.0inch
Display typeSuper AMOLEDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 2232480 x 854
Pixel density399ppi195ppi
Battery capacity4000.0mAh2000.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675Spreadtrum 7731
CPU specs2.0GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size6.0GB1.0GB
Storage size128.0GB8.0GB
Rear-camera resolution48.0MP5.0MP
Front-camera resolution16.0MP5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles