Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB vs. Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB Specs & Scores

Created date: 2019-07-03 05:54:47, Updated date: 2020-04-16 21:01:14

Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GBGionee Elife S Plus 16GB
Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GBGionee Elife S Plus 16GB

How are the "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" and "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GBGionee Elife S Plus 16GB
Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB

Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB

General rating:

76.4/100

(The 3174th of all smartphones)

52.4/100

(The 1454th of all smartphones)

Grip
54/100
57/100
Screen quality
80/100
61/100
Performance
98/100
73/100
Storage size
90/100
70/100
Battery
100/100
86/100
Rear-camera resolution
100/100
72/100
Front-camera resolution
100/100
65/100

What is the difference between the "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" and the "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" and "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB"

The design of Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB

The "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" is 156.8mm long, 74.5mm wide, and 8.7mm thick. It weighs 179.0g.

The design of Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB

The "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB" is 155.0mm long, 76.4mm wide, and 7.5mm thick. It weighs 158.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 1.8mm in length, 1.9mm in width, and 1.1mm in thickness. Both the "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" and "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" and "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB". Both the "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" and "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 21g. The "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB

Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB

Ease of holding it in one hand64/10062/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand33/10047/100
Ease of carrying around60/10059/100

Compare the display of the "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" and "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB"

Display of the Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB

The "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2340, and the pixel density is 403ppi. The "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" has a 6.39inch screen size.

Display of the Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB

The "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB" uses a AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.88inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. Both the "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" and the "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. If you compare how well the different phones support mobile games, the display size of "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" makes it more suited for playing games. Both the "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" and the "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB". The "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB

Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?79/10072/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?83/10073/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" and "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB"

Camera performance of Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB

The main camera of the "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" has 48.0MP. The front camera has 32.0MP.

Camera performance of Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB

The main camera of the "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 35MP difference in comparison. The "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" and the "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is a 27MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB

Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?100/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?100/10065/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" and "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB"

The processing capability of the Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" uses the Qualcomm SDM710 Snapdragon 710 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.2GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 8.0GB.

The processing capability of the Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6753 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB", the "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 5GB difference in memory capacity. The "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" has more memory storage, making the "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB". Both the "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" and the "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" than the "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB". The "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB

Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet100/10082/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games97/10066/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" and "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB"

Battery performance of Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB

The "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" has a battery capacity of 4030.0mAh.

Battery performance of Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB

The "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB" has a battery capacity of 3150.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 880mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" over the "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB". Both the "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" and the "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" and the "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB

Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/10086/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos100/10072/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" and "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB"

The storage capacity of the Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB

The "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" has 256.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB

The "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 240GB. The "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 240GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" or "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB". Both the "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" and the "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB

Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games90/10070/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos95/10090/100

Which to buy, the "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" or "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" or "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB"?

When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" and "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB". Its perfect screen size of 6.39inch makes the "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" a lot easier to use. The "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" and the "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB", the "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" is overall the clear winner.

Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB

Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB

Handling54/10057/100
Display80/10061/100
CPU specs98/10073/100
General rating86/10067/100

Is it recommended to buy the Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" is a high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" and "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GB" and "Gionee Elife S Plus 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GBGionee Elife S Plus 16GB
Xiaomi Mi CC9 256GBGionee Elife S Plus 16GB
ColorBlack/Blue/WhiteWhite/Gold/Dark Blue
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)74.5mm x 156.8mm x 8.7mm76.4mm x 155.0mm x 7.5mm
Weight179.0g158.0g
Display size6.39inch5.5inch
Display typeSuper AMOLEDAMOLED
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 2340720 x 1280
Pixel density403ppi267ppi
Battery capacity4030.0mAh3150.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm SDM710 Snapdragon 710Mediatek MT6753
CPU specs2.2GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.3GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size8.0GB3.0GB
Storage size256.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution48.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution32.0MP5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles