Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB vs Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Created date: 2019-07-11 05:44:23, Updated date: 2021-10-20 20:23:45

T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GBCelkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB
T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GBCelkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

How are the "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GBCelkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB
T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

General rating:
Griprating-image
71.4mm x 148.6mm x 8.1mm
rating-image3.2
71.8mm x 145.6mm x 8.0mm
Screen qualityrating-image3.2
IPS LCD, 5.7inch, 720 x 1520
rating-image2.8
IPS LCD, 5.0inch, 720 x 1280
Performancerating-image3.8
Qualcomm SDM632 Snapdragon 632, 1.8GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores), 3.0GB
rating-image2.4
Broadcom BCM23550, 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores), 2.0GB
Storage sizerating-image3.9
32.0GB
rating-image3.5
16.0GB
Batteryrating-image4.8
3000.0mAh
rating-image3.8
2500.0mAh
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image3.6
13.0MP
rating-image2.5
8.0MP
Front-camera resolutionrating-image4.0
8.0MP
rating-image2.5
2.0MP

What is the difference between the "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" and the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

The design of T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB

The "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" is 148.6mm long, 71.4mm wide, and 8.1mm thick.

The design of Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" is 145.6mm long, 71.8mm wide, and 8.0mm thick. It weighs 149.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

Both the "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB". Both the "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Ease of holding it in one hand70/10070/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand - 54/100
Ease of carrying around63/10063/100

Compare the display of the "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

Display of the T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB

The "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1520, and the pixel density is 295ppi. The "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" has a 5.7inch screen size.

Display of the Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.7inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. The "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" nor the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?73/10068/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?75/10060/100

Compare the camera performances of the "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

Camera performance of T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB

The main camera of the "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Camera performance of Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

The main camera of the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 2.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 5MP difference in comparison. The "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

There is a 6MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?72/10050/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?80/10050/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

The processing capability of the T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" uses the Qualcomm SDM632 Snapdragon 632 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.8GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.

The processing capability of the Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" uses the Broadcom BCM23550 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB", the "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB". The "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" than the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB".

T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet84/10070/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games67/10031/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

Battery performance of T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB

The "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.

Battery performance of Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 500mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

If you use the phone infrequently for just making calls or checking the time, I think the "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" is a bit better. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" over the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB". Both the "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" and the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet95/10076/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos87/10055/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

The storage capacity of the T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB

The "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 1024.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 16GB. "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 1008GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games78/10070/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos96/10059/100

Which to buy, the "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" or "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" or "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"?

If you want a larger screen, "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" is recommended as it has a 5.7inch screen. The "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" and the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB", the "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" is overall the clear winner.

T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Handling-63/100
Display64/10056/100
CPU specs76/10047/100
General rating75/10056/100

Is it recommended to buy the T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Judging from the overall specs, the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GBCelkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB
T-Mobile Revvlry (2019) 32GBCelkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB
ColorBlackWhite
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)71.4mm x 148.6mm x 8.1mm71.8mm x 145.6mm x 8.0mm
Weight149.0g
Display size5.7inch5.0inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1520720 x 1280
Pixel density295ppi293ppi
Battery capacity3000.0mAh2500.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm SDM632 Snapdragon 632Broadcom BCM23550
CPU specs1.8GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size3.0GB2.0GB
Storage size32.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP8.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP2.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles