Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB vs Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB: Full Comparison!
Created date: 2019-07-31 05:50:44, Updated date: 2020-04-16 22:33:52
Which do we recommend after comparing the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB".
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and the "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" or "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and the "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB"
The design of Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB
The "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" is 163.6mm long, 75.0mm wide, and 8.8mm thick. It weighs 205.0g.
The design of Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB
The "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB" is 153.0mm long, 75.4mm wide, and 7.7mm thick. It weighs 158.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 10.5mm in length, 0.4mm in width, and 1.1mm in thickness. Both the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB". Both the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 47g. The "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB | Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 63/100 | 64/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 16/100 | 47/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 59/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the display of the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB"
Display of the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB
The "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" uses a AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2340, and the pixel density is 403ppi. The "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" has a 6.39inch screen size.
Display of the Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB
The "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB" uses a LTPS IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 400ppi. The "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.88inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. Both the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and the "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. If you compare how well the different phones support mobile games, the display size of "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" makes it more suited for playing games. Both the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and the "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB | Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 79/100 | 72/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 83/100 | 73/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB"
Camera performance of Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB
The main camera of the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" has 48.0MP. The front camera has 20.0MP.
Camera performance of Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB
The main camera of the "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 35MP difference in comparison. The "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and the "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 15MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB | Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 100/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 100/100 | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB"
The processing capability of the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" uses the Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ SoC. The CPU performance is 2.96GHz+2.42GHz+1.78GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 12.0GB.
The processing capability of the Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB" uses the Mediatek MT6755 Helio P10 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.8GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB", the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 9GB difference in memory capacity. The "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" has more memory storage, making the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB". Both the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and the "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" than the "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB". The "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB | Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 100/100 | 81/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 99/100 | 62/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB"
Battery performance of Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB
The "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" has a battery capacity of 4000.0mAh.
Battery performance of Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB
The "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3260.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 740mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" over the "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB". Both the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and the "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and the "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB | Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 92/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 82/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB"
The storage capacity of the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB
The "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" has 256.0GB of internal memory.
The storage capacity of the Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB
The "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 224GB. The "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB | Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 90/100 | 78/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | - | 90/100 |
Which to buy, the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" or "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" or "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB"?
"Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. If you want a larger screen, "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" is recommended as it has a 6.39inch screen. The "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and the "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB", the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" is overall the clear winner.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB | Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 49/100 | 58/100 |
Display | 80/100 | 74/100 |
CPU specs | 99/100 | 71/100 |
General rating | 84/100 | 71/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" is a high-end smart phone.
Is it recommended to buy the Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
What are the spec differences between the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and "Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB | Meizu U20 (2016) 32GB | |
Color | Shadow Black/Iceberg Grey/Gulf Blue/Streamer Purple | Black/Silver/Rose Gold/Gold |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 75.0mm x 163.6mm x 8.8mm | 75.4mm x 153.0mm x 7.7mm |
Weight | 205.0g | 158.0g |
Display size | 6.39inch | 5.5inch |
Display type | AMOLED | LTPS IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2340 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 403ppi | 400ppi |
Battery capacity | 4000.0mAh | 3260.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ | Mediatek MT6755 Helio P10 |
CPU specs | 2.96GHz+2.42GHz+1.78GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.8GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 12.0GB | 3.0GB |
Storage size | 256.0GB | 32.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 48.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 20.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |