Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Compare Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB vs alcatel Fire C 2G

Created date: 2019-07-31 04:47:47, Updated date: 2020-04-16 21:30:55

Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GBalcatel Fire C 2G
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GBalcatel Fire C 2G

Which do we recommend after comparing the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and "alcatel Fire C 2G"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and "alcatel Fire C 2G".

Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GBalcatel Fire C 2G
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB

alcatel Fire C 2G

General rating:
Griprating-image2.5
75.0mm x 163.6mm x 8.8mm
rating-image4.0
62.0mm x 112.2mm x 12.0mm
Screen qualityrating-image4.0
AMOLED, 6.39inch, 1080 x 2340
rating-image1
TFT, 3.5inch, 320 x 480
Performancerating-image5.0
Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+, 2.96GHz+2.42GHz+1.78GHz×8(8.0-cores), 12.0GB
rating-image1
Spreadtrum 6821, 1.0GHz×1(1.0-cores), 128.0MB
Storage sizerating-image4.5
256.0GB
rating-image1
256.0MB
Batteryrating-image5.0
4000.0mAh
rating-image2.3
1000.0mAh
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image5.0
48.0MP
rating-image1.3
3.0MP
Front-camera resolutionrating-image5.0
20.0MP
rating-image

What is the difference between the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and the "alcatel Fire C 2G"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and "alcatel Fire C 2G"

The design of Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB

The "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" is 163.6mm long, 75.0mm wide, and 8.8mm thick. It weighs 205.0g.

The design of alcatel Fire C 2G

The "alcatel Fire C 2G" is 112.2mm long, 62.0mm wide, and 12.0mm thick. It weighs 93.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 51.3mm in length, 13mm in width, and 3.1mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "alcatel Fire C 2G" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "alcatel Fire C 2G", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "alcatel Fire C 2G" is more compact than "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.

The difference in weight is 112g. The "alcatel Fire C 2G" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB

alcatel Fire C 2G

Ease of holding it in one hand63/10077/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand16/100100/100
Ease of carrying around59/10068/100

Compare the display of the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and "alcatel Fire C 2G"

Display of the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB

The "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" uses a AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2340, and the pixel density is 403ppi. The "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" has a 6.39inch screen size.

Display of the alcatel Fire C 2G

The "alcatel Fire C 2G" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 320 x 480, and the pixel density is 164ppi. The "alcatel Fire C 2G" has a 3.5inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 2.88inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "alcatel Fire C 2G" shows only an unsatisfactory performance. In the gaming end, the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "alcatel Fire C 2G" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

In terms of display, the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "alcatel Fire C 2G". The "alcatel Fire C 2G" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB

alcatel Fire C 2G

How suited is the screen for usual usage?79/10025/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?83/10015/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and "alcatel Fire C 2G"

Camera performance of Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB

The main camera of the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" has 48.0MP. The front camera has 20.0MP.

Camera performance of alcatel Fire C 2G

The main camera of the "alcatel Fire C 2G" has 3.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 45MP difference in comparison. The "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB

alcatel Fire C 2G

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?100/10025/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?100/100 -

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and "alcatel Fire C 2G"

The processing capability of the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" uses the Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ SoC. The CPU performance is 2.96GHz+2.42GHz+1.78GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 12.0GB.

The processing capability of the alcatel Fire C 2G

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "alcatel Fire C 2G" uses the Spreadtrum 6821 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.0GHz×1(1.0-cores). The memory capacity is 128.0MB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "alcatel Fire C 2G", the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 116GB difference in memory capacity. The "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" has more memory storage, making the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" is the better choice to buy over the "alcatel Fire C 2G". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB". The "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "alcatel Fire C 2G" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

The "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" than the "alcatel Fire C 2G". The "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "alcatel Fire C 2G" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB

alcatel Fire C 2G

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet100/10017/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games99/1003/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and "alcatel Fire C 2G"

Battery performance of Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB

The "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" has a battery capacity of 4000.0mAh.

Battery performance of alcatel Fire C 2G

The "alcatel Fire C 2G" has a battery capacity of 1000.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 3000mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" over the "alcatel Fire C 2G". The "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "alcatel Fire C 2G" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB

alcatel Fire C 2G

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/10045/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos100/10023/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and "alcatel Fire C 2G"

The storage capacity of the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB

The "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" has 256.0GB of internal memory.

The storage capacity of the alcatel Fire C 2G

The "alcatel Fire C 2G" has 256.0MB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "alcatel Fire C 2G" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "alcatel Fire C 2G" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.

Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB

alcatel Fire C 2G

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games90/1001/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos - 54/100

Which to buy, the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" or "alcatel Fire C 2G"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" or "alcatel Fire C 2G"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "alcatel Fire C 2G" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 6.39inch makes the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" a lot easier to use. The "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and the "alcatel Fire C 2G", the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" is overall the clear winner.

Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB

alcatel Fire C 2G

Handling49/10080/100
Display80/10018/100
CPU specs99/10011/100
General rating84/10031/100

Is it recommended to buy the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" is a high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the alcatel Fire C 2G, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "alcatel Fire C 2G" looks compact, and is quite excellent in its ease of being held. It is recommended if you are looking for a device that can be easily operated and held with one hand. The screen size is smaller than that of standard smartphones. The font size on the screen is also rather small, so it is not suited for reading articles or long texts on the internet. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "alcatel Fire C 2G" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and "alcatel Fire C 2G" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GB" and "alcatel Fire C 2G". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GBalcatel Fire C 2G
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 256GBalcatel Fire C 2G
ColorShadow Black/Iceberg Grey/Gulf Blue/Streamer PurpleBluish Black/Dark Chocolate
OSAndroidFirefox
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)75.0mm x 163.6mm x 8.8mm62.0mm x 112.2mm x 12.0mm
Weight205.0g93.0g
Display size6.39inch3.5inch
Display typeAMOLEDTFT
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 2340320 x 480
Pixel density403ppi164ppi
Battery capacity4000.0mAh1000.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+Spreadtrum 6821
CPU specs2.96GHz+2.42GHz+1.78GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.0GHz×1(1.0-cores)
RAM size12.0GB128.0MB
Storage size256.0GB256.0MB
Rear-camera resolution48.0MP3.0MP
Front-camera resolution20.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles