Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

A comparive review of the differences between the Philips S616 (2015) 16GB and ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB. We covered a wide range of variables

Created date: 2019-09-06 05:35:38, Updated date: 2020-04-15 21:07:09

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GBPhilips S616 (2015) 16GB
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GBPhilips S616 (2015) 16GB

How are the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Philips S616 (2015) 16GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GBPhilips S616 (2015) 16GB
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

Philips S616 (2015) 16GB

General rating:
Griprating-image2.1
78.5mm x 171.7mm x 9.7mm
rating-image3.0
71.6mm x 143.0mm x 9.8mm
Screen qualityrating-image4.0
AMOLED, 6.65inch, 1080 x 2340
rating-image3.7
IPS LCD, 5.5inch, 1080 x 1920
Performancerating-image5.0
Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+, 2.96GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores), 12.0GB
rating-image3.0
1.3GHz×8(8.0-cores), 2.0GB
Storage sizerating-image4.5
256.0GB
rating-image3.5
16.0GB
Batteryrating-image5.0
5000.0mAh
rating-image4.2
3000.0mAh
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image5.0
48.0MP
rating-image3.6
13.0MP
Front-camera resolutionrating-image5.0
16.0MP
rating-image

What is the difference between the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and the "Philips S616 (2015) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Philips S616 (2015) 16GB"

The design of ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is 171.7mm long, 78.5mm wide, and 9.7mm thick. It weighs 215.0g.

The design of Philips S616 (2015) 16GB

The "Philips S616 (2015) 16GB" is 143.0mm long, 71.6mm wide, and 9.8mm thick. It weighs 164.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 28.6mm in length, 6.9mm in width, and 0.1mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Philips S616 (2015) 16GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Philips S616 (2015) 16GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "Philips S616 (2015) 16GB" is more compact than "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.

The difference in weight is 51g. The "Philips S616 (2015) 16GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

Philips S616 (2015) 16GB

Ease of holding it in one hand54/10068/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand9/10043/100
Ease of carrying around54/10062/100

Compare the display of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Philips S616 (2015) 16GB"

Display of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" uses a AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2340, and the pixel density is 387ppi. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has a 6.65inch screen size.

Display of the Philips S616 (2015) 16GB

The "Philips S616 (2015) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 400ppi. The "Philips S616 (2015) 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 1.15inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. Both the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and the "Philips S616 (2015) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" offers a more suitable screen size. Both the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and the "Philips S616 (2015) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Philips S616 (2015) 16GB" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

Philips S616 (2015) 16GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?81/10072/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?86/10073/100

Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Philips S616 (2015) 16GB"

Camera performance of ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

The main camera of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has 48.0MP. The front camera has 16.0MP.

Camera performance of Philips S616 (2015) 16GB

The main camera of the "Philips S616 (2015) 16GB" has 13.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 35MP difference in comparison. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and the "Philips S616 (2015) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

Philips S616 (2015) 16GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?100/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?100/100 -

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Philips S616 (2015) 16GB"

The processing capability of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" uses the Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ SoC. The CPU performance is 2.96GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 12.0GB.

The processing capability of the Philips S616 (2015) 16GB

The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Philips S616 (2015) 16GB", the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 10GB difference in memory capacity. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has more memory storage, making the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Philips S616 (2015) 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB". The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" than the "Philips S616 (2015) 16GB". The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

Philips S616 (2015) 16GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet100/10077/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games99/10041/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Philips S616 (2015) 16GB"

Battery performance of ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has a battery capacity of 5000.0mAh.

Battery performance of Philips S616 (2015) 16GB

The "Philips S616 (2015) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 2000mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" over the "Philips S616 (2015) 16GB". Both the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and the "Philips S616 (2015) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

Philips S616 (2015) 16GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/10083/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos100/10068/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Philips S616 (2015) 16GB"

The storage capacity of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has 256.0GB of internal memory.

The storage capacity of the Philips S616 (2015) 16GB

The "Philips S616 (2015) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 240GB. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Philips S616 (2015) 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

Philips S616 (2015) 16GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games90/10070/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos - 90/100

Which to buy, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" or "Philips S616 (2015) 16GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" or "Philips S616 (2015) 16GB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Philips S616 (2015) 16GB" is a great choice. If you want a larger screen, "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is recommended as it has a 6.65inch screen. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and the "Philips S616 (2015) 16GB", the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is overall the clear winner.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

Philips S616 (2015) 16GB

Handling42/10059/100
Display80/10074/100
CPU specs99/10059/100
General rating83/10066/100

Is it recommended to buy the ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is a high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Philips S616 (2015) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Philips S616 (2015) 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Philips S616 (2015) 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Philips S616 (2015) 16GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Philips S616 (2015) 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GBPhilips S616 (2015) 16GB
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GBPhilips S616 (2015) 16GB
ColorMecha Silver/Cyber Shade/Eclipse BlackBlack
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)78.5mm x 171.7mm x 9.7mm71.6mm x 143.0mm x 9.8mm
Weight215.0g164.0g
Display size6.65inch5.5inch
Display typeAMOLEDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 23401080 x 1920
Pixel density387ppi400ppi
Battery capacity5000.0mAh3000.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+
CPU specs2.96GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.3GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size12.0GB2.0GB
Storage size256.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution48.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution16.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles