Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB vs Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB: Which is the best?

Created date: 2019-09-06 06:03:56, Updated date: 2020-04-16 21:03:44

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GBLava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GBLava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB

How are the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GBLava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB

General rating:
Griprating-image2.1
42/100
rating-image3.6
72/100
Screen qualityrating-image4.0
80/100
rating-image1.7
34/100
Performancerating-image5.0
99/100
rating-image1
15/100
Storage sizerating-image4.5
90/100
rating-image1
2/100
Batteryrating-image5.0
100/100
rating-image2.8
55/100
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image5.0
100/100
rating-image3.9
77/100
Front-camera resolutionrating-image5.0
100/100
rating-image
- /100

What is the difference between the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and the "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB"

The design of ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is 171.7mm long, 78.5mm wide, and 9.7mm thick. It weighs 215.0g.

The design of Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB

The "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" is 125.5mm long, 64.5mm wide, and 11.4mm thick. It weighs 124.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 46.1mm in length, 14mm in width, and 1.7mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB", making it relatively more user-friendly. The "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" is also much easier to carry around, and scores more points than the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" for portability.

The difference in weight is 91g. The "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB

Ease of holding it in one hand54/10074/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand9/10074/100
Ease of carrying around54/10066/100

Compare the display of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB"

Display of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" uses a AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2340, and the pixel density is 387ppi. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has a 6.65inch screen size.

Display of the Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB

The "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 800, and the pixel density is 233ppi. The "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" has a 4.0inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 2.65inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

In terms of display, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB". The "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?81/10046/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?86/10025/100

Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB"

Camera performance of ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

The main camera of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has 48.0MP. The front camera has 16.0MP.

Camera performance of Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB

The main camera of the "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" has 15.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 33MP difference in comparison. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. Also, for taking photos of objects in close proximity such as desserts or food that can be posted on Instagram, the camera of "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has a better performance. Both the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and the "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?100/10077/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?100/100 -

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB"

The processing capability of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" uses the Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ SoC. The CPU performance is 2.96GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 12.0GB.

The processing capability of the Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB

The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 256.0MB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB", the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 244GB difference in memory capacity. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has more memory storage, making the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB". The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" than the "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB". The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet100/10027/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games99/1004/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB"

Battery performance of ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has a battery capacity of 5000.0mAh.

Battery performance of Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB

The "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" has a battery capacity of 1500.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 3500mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" over the "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB". The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/10055/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos100/10033/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB"

The storage capacity of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has 256.0GB of internal memory.

The storage capacity of the Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB

The "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" has 512.0MB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 256GB. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games90/1002/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos - 54/100

Which to buy, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" or "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" or "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 6.65inch makes the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" a lot easier to use. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and the "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB", the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is overall the clear winner.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB

Handling42/10072/100
Display80/10034/100
CPU specs99/10015/100
General rating83/10037/100

Is it recommended to buy the ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is a high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Lava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GBLava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GBLava 3G 402 (2013) 512MB
ColorMecha Silver/Cyber Shade/Eclipse BlackMetallic Brown/Metallic Grey/Metallic White
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)78.5mm x 171.7mm x 9.7mm64.5mm x 125.5mm x 11.4mm
Weight215.0g124.0g
Display size6.65inch4.0inch
Display typeAMOLEDTFT
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 2340480 x 800
Pixel density387ppi233ppi
Battery capacity5000.0mAh1500.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+
CPU specs2.96GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.2GHz×2(2.0-cores)
RAM size12.0GB256.0MB
Storage size256.0GB512.0MB
Rear-camera resolution48.0MP15.0MP
Front-camera resolution16.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles