ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB and Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB review
Created date: 2019-09-06 06:08:58, Updated date: 2020-04-16 18:53:01
Which do we recommend after comparing the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB".
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB | Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB | |||
General rating: | 79.4/100 (The 3046th of all smartphones) | 36.1/100 (The 2814th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 42/100 | 40/100 | ||
Screen quality | 80/100 | 58/100 | ||
Performance | 99/100 | 28/100 | ||
Storage size | 90/100 | 35/100 | ||
Battery | 100/100 | 67/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 100/100 | 50/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 100/100 | - /100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and the "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" or "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB" ?
What is the difference between the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and the "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB"
The design of ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB
The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is 171.7mm long, 78.5mm wide, and 9.7mm thick. It weighs 215.0g.
The design of Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB
The "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB" is 164.0mm long, 85.4mm wide, and 9.0mm thick. It weighs 192.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 7.6mm in length, 6.9mm in width, and 0.6mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" easier to use and carry around. "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is bigger than "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Also, "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is more compact than "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.
The difference in weight is 23g. The "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB | Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 54/100 | 43/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 9/100 | 24/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 54/100 | 48/100 |
Compare the display of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB"
Display of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB
The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" uses a AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2340, and the pixel density is 387ppi. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has a 6.65inch screen size.
Display of the Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB
The "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 540 x 960, and the pixel density is 183ppi. The "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB" has a 6.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.65inch difference in the display sizes. When you actually look at the screen, "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" feels like it has a slightly bigger display. "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. Both the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and the "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. If you compare how well the different phones support mobile games, the display size of "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" makes it more suited for playing games. Both the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and the "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB". The "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB | Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 81/100 | 76/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 86/100 | 78/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB"
Camera performance of ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB
The main camera of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has 48.0MP. The front camera has 16.0MP.
Camera performance of Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB
The main camera of the "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB" has 8.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 40MP difference in comparison. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB | Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 100/100 | 50/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 100/100 | - |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB"
The processing capability of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" uses the Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ SoC. The CPU performance is 2.96GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 12.0GB.
The processing capability of the Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB" uses the Mediatek MT6582 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB", the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 11GB difference in memory capacity. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has more memory storage, making the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB". The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" than the "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB". The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB | Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 100/100 | 47/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 99/100 | 12/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB"
Battery performance of ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB
The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has a battery capacity of 5000.0mAh.
Battery performance of Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB
The "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 2500mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" over the "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB". The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB | Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 67/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 43/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB"
The storage capacity of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB
The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has 256.0GB of internal memory.
The storage capacity of the Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB
The "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 248GB. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB | Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 90/100 | 35/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | - | 56/100 |
Which to buy, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" or "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" or "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB"?
When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB". Its perfect screen size of 6.65inch makes the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" a lot easier to use. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and the "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB", the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is overall the clear winner.
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB | Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 42/100 | 40/100 |
Display | 80/100 | 58/100 |
CPU specs | 99/100 | 28/100 |
General rating | 83/100 | 43/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is a high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB | Lenovo A889 (2014) 8GB | |
Color | Mecha Silver/Cyber Shade/Eclipse Black | White |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 78.5mm x 171.7mm x 9.7mm | 85.4mm x 164.0mm x 9.0mm |
Weight | 215.0g | 192.0g |
Display size | 6.65inch | 6.0inch |
Display type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2340 | 540 x 960 |
Pixel density | 387ppi | 183ppi |
Battery capacity | 5000.0mAh | 2500.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ | Mediatek MT6582 |
CPU specs | 2.96GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 12.0GB | 1.0GB |
Storage size | 256.0GB | 8.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 48.0MP | 8.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 16.0MP | |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |