Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB vs Lava A51 (2016) 8GB

Created date: 2019-09-06 05:57:02, Updated date: 2020-04-15 20:15:19

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GBLava A51 (2016) 8GB
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GBLava A51 (2016) 8GB

How are the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Lava A51 (2016) 8GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GBLava A51 (2016) 8GB
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

Lava A51 (2016) 8GB

General rating:
Griprating-image2.1
42/100
rating-image
- /100
Screen qualityrating-image4.0
80/100
rating-image2.1
41/100
Performancerating-image5.0
99/100
rating-image1.2
23/100
Storage sizerating-image4.5
90/100
rating-image1.8
35/100
Batteryrating-image5.0
100/100
rating-image3.6
71/100
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image5.0
100/100
rating-image1.8
35/100
Front-camera resolutionrating-image5.0
100/100
rating-image
- /100

What is the difference between the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and the "Lava A51 (2016) 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Lava A51 (2016) 8GB"

The design of ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is 171.7mm long, 78.5mm wide, and 9.7mm thick. It weighs 215.0g.

The design of Lava A51 (2016) 8GB

The "Lava A51 (2016) 8GB" is 136.0mm long, 66.0mm wide, and 9.9mm thick.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 35.6mm in length, 12.5mm in width, and 0.2mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Lava A51 (2016) 8GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Lava A51 (2016) 8GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. The "Lava A51 (2016) 8GB" is also much easier to carry around, and scores more points than the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" for portability.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

Lava A51 (2016) 8GB

Ease of holding it in one hand54/10074/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand9/100 -
Ease of carrying around54/10066/100

Compare the display of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Lava A51 (2016) 8GB"

Display of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" uses a AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2340, and the pixel density is 387ppi. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has a 6.65inch screen size.

Display of the Lava A51 (2016) 8GB

The "Lava A51 (2016) 8GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 854, and the pixel density is 217ppi. The "Lava A51 (2016) 8GB" has a 4.5inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 2.15inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Lava A51 (2016) 8GB". The "Lava A51 (2016) 8GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

Lava A51 (2016) 8GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?81/10059/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?86/10041/100

Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Lava A51 (2016) 8GB"

Camera performance of ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

The main camera of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has 48.0MP. The front camera has 16.0MP.

Camera performance of Lava A51 (2016) 8GB

The main camera of the "Lava A51 (2016) 8GB" has 5.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 43MP difference in comparison. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

Lava A51 (2016) 8GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?100/10035/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?100/100 -

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Lava A51 (2016) 8GB"

The processing capability of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" uses the Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ SoC. The CPU performance is 2.96GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 12.0GB.

The processing capability of the Lava A51 (2016) 8GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Lava A51 (2016) 8GB" uses the Spreadtrum SC7731C SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Lava A51 (2016) 8GB", the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 500GB difference in memory capacity. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has more memory storage, making the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Lava A51 (2016) 8GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB". The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" than the "Lava A51 (2016) 8GB". The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Lava A51 (2016) 8GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

Lava A51 (2016) 8GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet100/10044/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games99/1006/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Lava A51 (2016) 8GB"

Battery performance of ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has a battery capacity of 5000.0mAh.

Battery performance of Lava A51 (2016) 8GB

The "Lava A51 (2016) 8GB" has a battery capacity of 1750.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 3250mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" over the "Lava A51 (2016) 8GB". Both the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and the "Lava A51 (2016) 8GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

Lava A51 (2016) 8GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/10071/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos100/10047/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Lava A51 (2016) 8GB"

The storage capacity of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has 256.0GB of internal memory.

The storage capacity of the Lava A51 (2016) 8GB

The "Lava A51 (2016) 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 248GB. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Lava A51 (2016) 8GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Lava A51 (2016) 8GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

Lava A51 (2016) 8GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games90/10035/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos - 56/100

Which to buy, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" or "Lava A51 (2016) 8GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" or "Lava A51 (2016) 8GB"?

Its perfect screen size of 6.65inch makes the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" a lot easier to use. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and the "Lava A51 (2016) 8GB", the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is overall the clear winner.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB

Lava A51 (2016) 8GB

Handling42/100-
Display80/10041/100
CPU specs99/10023/100
General rating83/10039/100

Is it recommended to buy the ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is a high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Lava A51 (2016) 8GB, compared with other smartphones?

The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. When looking at its overall specs, the "Lava A51 (2016) 8GB" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Lava A51 (2016) 8GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Lava A51 (2016) 8GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GBLava A51 (2016) 8GB
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GBLava A51 (2016) 8GB
ColorMecha Silver/Cyber Shade/Eclipse BlackGray/Black/Gold
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)78.5mm x 171.7mm x 9.7mm66.0mm x 136.0mm x 9.9mm
Weight215.0g
Display size6.65inch4.5inch
Display typeAMOLEDTFT
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 2340480 x 854
Pixel density387ppi217ppi
Battery capacity5000.0mAh1750.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+Spreadtrum SC7731C
CPU specs2.96GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size12.0GB512.0MB
Storage size256.0GB8.0GB
Rear-camera resolution48.0MP5.0MP
Front-camera resolution16.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles